Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | June 1, 2015

VIEWS 1
| Download 2

A comparative study of judge authority in adjustment contracts in the Iranian and French laws

Mahbobeh Golpichi, Pejman Mohamadi

Key Words:


J. Bio. Env. Sci.6(6), 552-558, June 2015

Certification:

JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The principle of stability and firmness of contracts has been recognized in laws of obligations as a general rule. Undoubtedly, principle of intention dominance and the rule of adherence of contract from common intention require that compromise provisions always be respected and needed-to-meet and none of the two parties cannot defy from provision contract and due obligations or capture the territory of common will or theater the terms of the contract. In investigating the limits the contractual freedom principle, the judge authority in juridical moderation of contract, is along with forging this authority for the judge which if required after attaining qualifications to change the situation and conditions of the contract, the purpose of this balance and fairness and uniformity in terms of its contractual obligations after making changes to the terms of modifications to the Amendment Agreement. Articles 277 and 652 of the Civil Code of Iran in the format of granting juridical date and the division of judicial enforcement of the obligation, the possibility to intervene in contract by judge are anticipated. But the issue of judge’s authority to modify the contract is not stated directly. weather a comparative study of different countries in the admitting this subject, and by taking a principled and juratory rules-based solutions, fill this legal gap and by proposing passing appropriate laws, we give judge the authority to modify the contract and provide the possibility to fulfill long-term contracts that have not been implemented due to unpredictable events, or faced with an obstacle.

VIEWS 1

Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

A comparative study of judge authority in adjustment contracts in the Iranian and French laws

Bigdeli S. 2009. Modified. Second edition. Tehran. The legal foundation.

Catozian N. 1990. Introduction of Rights. Tehran.

Catozian N. 1995. Civil rights (swap transactions, purchase contracts). Tehran.

Catozian N. 2011. General rules of contract. the sixth edition. 3. Tehran.

Hekmat MA. 1986. The impact of changes in credit conditions and international contracts. International Journal of Legal Services. N. 3.

Ismael Abadi A. 2006. Adeleh comparative study period. Legal light Journal. No. 11.

Kermani H. 1996. A review of unfair contract terms in the Anglo-Iranian Rights. Tehran University.

Qasm¬Zadh M. 2009. Concise contracts and commitments. First Edition. Tehran.

Sadqy Mqdm MH. 2011. Changes in the terms of the contract. third edition. Tehran.

Safai H. 1972. The Cairo or force majeure. Legal Journal 3.

Shafayi MR. 1997. Comparative study of the situation in Contracts. First Edition. Tehran.

Shahidi M. 1989. Falling commitments. Thirteenth Edition. Thran.

Shahidi M. 2007. Civil rights and obligations of the contract 3.Tehran.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background