A conceptual framework for a sustainable agro-eco tourism development for CSU Gonzaga campus
Paper Details
A conceptual framework for a sustainable agro-eco tourism development for CSU Gonzaga campus
Abstract
This paper presents a conceptual framework for sustainable agro-eco tourism development at the Cagayan State University (CSU) Gonzaga Campus. Addressing global and local development initiatives, specifically the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8, 12, and 15, and the National Tourism Development Plan (NTDP) 2023-2028, the framework emphasizes the role of ecotourism as a tool for sustainable development. The Philippines’ agro-eco tourism sector, contributing 12.7% to the 2019 GDP, shows significant potential for growth but faces challenges such as infrastructure development, promotion, and ecological preservation. The research employs a descriptive, explanatory, and case study approach, with data collection methods including focus group discussions with key stakeholders and literature review. A stakeholder analysis underscores the importance of collaboration among various interest groups, institutions, and individuals. CSU Gonzaga Campus, with its rich agro-forestry resources and the CSU Bamboo Sanctuary, is poised to become an agro-eco tourism destination. The Bamboo Sanctuary not only increases bamboo material supply and integrates new processing technologies but also addresses climate change impacts, creates jobs, and promotes bamboo’s environmental benefits. The paper highlights community-based tourism, advocating for local ownership and management of tourism projects. Collaboration, a key strategy, involves shared resources, skills, and knowledge to achieve common goals. The study discusses successful collaborative relationships between the education community and the tourism sector, emphasizing non-monetary resources and community ownership. A synergic framework of collaboration, integrating community-based tourism, synergy theory, and CSU’s profile, is proposed. The organizational structure for the Bamboo Sanctuary includes roles such as President, Campus Executive Officer, and heads of various departments. Recommendations for future research focus on assessing the framework’s effectiveness in income generation, identifying implementation gaps, and addressing barriers. This framework aims to foster sustainable economic growth, responsible consumption, and ecological preservation, aligning with both global and national development agendas.
Alberta T, Kovaci I, Trajkovska Petkoska A. 2022. Sustainable tourism as a potential for promotion of regional heritage, local food, traditions, and diversity—Case of Kosovo. Sustainability 14(19), 12326. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912326.
Andereck KL, Valentine KM, Knopf RC, Vogt CA. 2017. Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research 65, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.03.005.
Anisa E. 2023. Sustainable tourism. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences, 187–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1843-0_7.
Blanco-Romero A, González M, Guerrero FM. 2017. The role of local populations in sustainable tourism development: A case study from Spain. Tourism Management Perspectives 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.02.001.
Budhi CS, Fitriani MA. 2022. A review of sustainable tourism curriculum on higher education. Journal of Tourism Sustainability 2(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.35313/jtospolban.v2i2.37.
Fennell DA. 2014. Ecotourism. 4th ed. Routledge.
Gheorghe M, Cozea A. 2023. Regional economic development supported by sustainable tourism. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management 5(1), 21885. https://doi.org/10.55267/djfm/13400.
Gupta A, Zhu H, Bhammar H, Earley E, Filipski M, Narain U, Girouard PS, Whitney E. 2023. Economic impact of nature-based tourism. PLOS ONE 18(4), e0282912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282912.
Hall CM, Müller DK, editors. 2004. Tourism, mobility, and second homes: Between elite landscape and common ground. Channel View Publications.
Jennifer KL, Chan L. 2023. Sustainable rural tourism practices from the local tourism stakeholders’ perspectives. Global Business and Finance Review 28(3), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.136.
Kim J, Chan L. 2023. Sustainable rural tourism practices from the local tourism stakeholders’ perspectives. Global Business and Finance Review 28(3), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.136.
Mazzocchi C, Sali G. 2022. Tourists’ perception of ecosystem services provided by mountain agriculture. Sustainability 14(19), 12171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912171.
Misak C. 2022. Tourists’ perceived attitudes toward the famous terraced agricultural cultural heritage landscape in China. Agriculture 12(9), 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091394.
Nafiah A, Fauzi A. 2022. A policy framework for sustainable tourism development based on participatory approaches: A case study in the Kedung Ombo tourism area, Indonesia. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 40(1), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.40115-811.
Sharpley R, Telfer DJ, editors. 2008. Tourism and development: Concepts and issues. Channel View Publications.
Špačková A. 2023. Furthering protected area tourism and visitor management and planning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003230748-11.
Sri W, Abdurrahman A, Budi AR, Park J. 2022. The impacts of eco-tourism and agrotourism based on plant variety protection to sustain biological diversity and green economic growth in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies 4(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2022.4.2.15.
Swarbrooke J, Horner S. 2012. Consumer behaviour in tourism. Routledge.
Unknown author. 2022. Perceptions of the impacts of nature conservation and ecotourism management: A case study in the Kakum conservation area of Ghana. https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-4109.
Unknown author. 2022. Smart and sustainable destination management: An analytical framework. Tourism on the Verge, 63–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33677-5_3.
Unknown author. 2022. Sustainable tourism and an analysis of opportunities for and challenges to researchers and professionals. In: Sustainable Practices in Tourism, 535–548. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4645-4.ch025.
Ana Marie Cristina C. Cauilan, 2025. A conceptual framework for a sustainable agro-eco tourism development for CSU Gonzaga campus. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci., 26(2), 14-21.
Copyright © 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.