A cost-benefit analysis for utilization of poultry manure in cabbage production among smallholder crop-livestock farmers

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2011
Views (311) Download (14)

A cost-benefit analysis for utilization of poultry manure in cabbage production among smallholder crop-livestock farmers

Mugerwa Swidiq, Kabirizi Jolly Mary, Kigongo John, Zziwa Emmanuel
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.1( 2), 14-19, December 2011.
Certificate: IJAAR 2011 [Generate Certificate]


Efficient utilization of animal manures is critical in sustaining productivity and profitability of smallholder crop-livestock production systems. However, adoption of particular manure application regimes would only be possible if the recommended regimes make economic sense to farmers whose major objective is usually to generate incomes. An on-farm experiment was conducted for three rainy seasons in Uganda to evaluate the economic benefits derived from production of cabbage under different levels of poultry manure (PM). The PM levels investigated included 0t/ha-1, 1t/ha-1, 2t/ha-1, 3t/ha-1, and 4t/ha-1 replicated three times per season. The total costs that vary, the gross and net benefits for each treatment were calculated and subsequently used to construct a partial budget from which dominance analysis was conducted. The non dominated treatments were then selected for marginal rate of analysis. The highest net benefits (Ug. shs 9,266,000) were obtained at 4t/ha. The net benefits at 4 and 3 t/ha were 21 and 13% higher than the benefits at 0 t/ha. Dominance analysis indicated that the net benefits of treatments 1 and 2 t/ha was lower than the net benefits of treatment 0 t/ha. The marginal rate of return (MRR) from 0 to 3 was 189%. Increasing the rate of PM from 3 to 4 t/ha resulted into a MRR of 237% while increasing the rate from 0 directly to 4 t/ha showed a much higher MRR of 384%. The results of study revealed that cabbage production was most profitable at 4t/ha of PM application.


Best K. 2000. Adaptation of Cabbage Varieties. ARP Training Reports. AVRDC-AFRICA Regional Programme, Arusha, Tanzania,p.10.

Brady CN. 1990. The nature and properties of soils 10th Edition. MacMillan Publishing Company, NY and Collier MacMillan Publishers, London

Cesalis TR. 2002. Yield Evaluation of Lettuce Varieties. Agricultural Technology Journal 5, 20-24.

CIMMYT. 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economic training manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico. D.F.

Ijoyah MO, Sophie VL. 2009. Effects of different levels of decomposed poultry manure on yield of cabbage (Brassica oleraceae l.) at Anse boileau, Seychelles. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension 8, 20-23.

Moamogwe M. 1995. Adaptation Trial of Introduced Cabbage Cultivars. ARP Training Reports (1995-1997) AVRDC-AFRICA Regional Programme, Arusha, Tanzania, pp. 27-29.

Rajkomar I. 2002. Comparative Performance of Three Cabbage Varieties to Different Rates of Poultry Manure in Madagascar. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 41, 98-101.

Reddy TY, Reddi GH. 1995. Principles of Agronomy. 2nd Edition, Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi, 110002, p.223.

Sunassee S. 2001. Use of Litter for Vegetable Production. AMAS 2001. Food and Agricultural Research Council, Reduit, Mauritius, pp. 259 – 263.

Talekar NS. 2000. Chinese Cabbage. Proceedings 1st International Symposium on Cabbage. AVRDC, Shanhua, Tainan, Taiwan, pp. 67-69.

Kishor G, Jitu S, Hari KC. 2011. Economic Benefits and Costs of Jatropha Plantation in North-East India. Agricultural Economics Research Review 24, 99-108.