Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

A review on morphological characterization, variation and distribution pattern of Eurema butterflies of Peninsular Malaysia

Research Paper | March 1, 2015

| Download 3

Noor Azrizal-Wahid, Mohd Sofian-Azirun, Mohammed Rizman-Idid

Key Words:

J. Bio. Env. Sci.6( 3), 359-372, March 2015


JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]


Seven species of Eurema butterflies comprised of 263 adult individuals collected from various sampling sites of Peninsular Malaysia were identified and diagnosed based on their morphological characteristics and variation pattern. The result from diagnosis revealed that the main morphological characteristics that differentiated between the members of Eurema butterflies are the number of cell spots in discoidal cell and the pattern of brown apical patch, both located on the underside of the forewing. E. sari, E. blanda and E. tilaha are morphologically distinct and easily identified. Species of Eurema butterflies showed no variations, except for E. hecabe that had variable patterns of forewing black apical border in several individuals, which corresponded to the altitudinal changes of their sampling sites. The distribution of the genus Eurema in Peninsular Malaysia is also discussed based on the recorded field sampling data. The record shows that all six species with the exception of E. tilaha which was excluded from this study were evenly distributed across all sampling areas and can be found at most part throughout the Peninsular Malaysia with species of E. andersonii has the most consistent distribution pattern in all four different areas of sampling. This study also suggested that the most common species of the genus Eurema in Malaysia is species of E. blanda while E. tilaha was reported as the rare species.


Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

A review on morphological characterization, variation and distribution pattern of Eurema butterflies of Peninsular Malaysia

Andrén H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat — a review. Oikos 71, 355–366.

Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sohdi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram K, Das I. 2006. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22(3), 148–155.

Braby MF. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: Their identification, biology and distribution. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood Victoria.

Choudhary DK, Singh B, Singh PP. 2002. Relative abundance of pollinators /insect visitors n Litchi Blooms. Indian Journal of Entomology 64(2), 170-174.

Colbet AS, Pendlebury HM. 1992. The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula, 4th Edition. Malayan Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur.

Collins FH, Paskewitz SM. 1996. A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species. Insect Molecular Biology 5, 1–9.

Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34, 487–515.

Gilcristh GW. 1990. The consequences of sexual dimorphism in body size for butterfly flight and thermoregulation. Functional Ecology 4, 475-487.

Gullan PJ, Cranston PS. 2005 “The insects: an outline of entomology” (5th Ed). Wiley-Blackwell, Ltd preview in Google Books. Accessed on 12 Jan 2010.

Heim I. 2003. Synthetische Taxonomie zur Gattung Aplysina Nardo, 1834. Diploma Thesis. Fakultät für Bio-und Geowissenschaften. Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.

Heinrich B. 1986. Thermoregulation and fight activity of a Satyrine, Coenonymphainornata (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Ecology 67, 59-597.

Hodgkin EP, Watson JAL. 1958. Breeding of dragonflies in temporary waters. Nature 181, 1015-1016.

Hussain KJ, Ramesh T, Satpathy KK, Selvanayagam. 2011. Seasonal dynamics of butterfly population in DAE campus, Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3(1), 1401-1414.

Jeratthitikul E, Lewvanich A, Butcher BA, Lekprayoon C. 2009. A taxonomic study of the genus Eurema Hübner [1819] (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Thailand. The Natural History – Journal of Chulalongkorn University 9(1), 1-20.

Jones RE. 1992. Phenotypic variation in Australian Eurema species. Australian Journal of Zoology 40, 371-383.

Kitching RL. 1998. Biology of Australian Butterflies. The Grass Yellow, Eurema Species (Pieridae). RE, Jones. p143-151.

Narita S, Nomura M, Kato Y, Yata O, Kageyama D. 2007. Molecular phylogeography of two sibling species of Eurema butterflies. Genetica 13, 241-253.

Nijhout HF. 2001. Elements of butterfly wing patterns. Journal of Experimental Zoology 291, 213–225.

Orr D. 2003. The constitution of nature. Conservation Biology 17, 1478–1484.

Pinratana A. 1983. Butterflies in Thailand. Vol. 2. Pieridae and Amathusiidae. Bangkok: Viratham Pr. 71pp, 48pl.

Shelton MD, Edwards CR. 1983. Effects of weeds on the diversity and abundance of insects in soybeans. Environmental Entomology 12(2), 296-298.

Southwood TRE. 1975. The dynamics of insect populations. In: Pimental D, Ed. Insects, science and society. Academic, New York, p151-199.

Suhling F, Schenk K, Padeffke T, Martens A. 2004. A field study of larval development in a dragonfly assemblage in African desert ponds (Odonata). Hydrobiologia 528, 75-85.

Van Dyck H, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA. 1997. The effect of wing colour on male behavioural strategies in the speckled wood butterfly. Animal Behaviour 53, 39–51.

Yata O. 1989. A revision of the Old World species of the genus Eurema Hübner (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) I. Phylogeny and zoogeography of the subgenus Terias Swainson and description of the subgenus Eurema Hübner. Bull Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History 9, 1–103.

Yata O. 1995. A revision of the Old World species of the genus Eurema Hübner (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) Part V. Description of the hecabe group (part). Bull Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History 14, 1–54.