Above and below ground carbon stock assessment of natural and planted mangrove forest in Davao Occidental, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 16/01/2026
Views (175)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Above and below ground carbon stock assessment of natural and planted mangrove forest in Davao Occidental, Philippines

C. F. Mangaga*, W. T. Tatil, H. A. R. Quiaoit, P. D. Suson
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 157-167, January 2026.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Mangrove forests are important blue carbon ecosystems due to their ability to store carbon in aboveground biomass, belowground biomass, and soil. This study compared the carbon stock of natural and planted mangrove forests in Malita and Jose Abad Santos, Davao Occidental, Philippines. Carbon stocks were quantified using non-destructive quadrat and stratified random sampling across landward, mid, and seaward zones. Aboveground and belowground biomass was estimated using allometric equations, while soil organic carbon was determined through laboratory analysis and bulk density measurements. Total carbon stock in natural mangrove forests ranged from 372.28 to 8,167.92 Mg C ha⁻¹, whereas planted mangrove forests ranged from 245.92 to 2,506.52 Mg C ha⁻¹. The maximum carbon stock in natural forests was recorded in the landward zone of Transect 2 (8,167.92 Mg C ha⁻¹), while the highest value in planted forests occurred in the midzone of Transect 1 (2,506.52 Mg C ha⁻¹). Non-parametric analysis showed a significant effect of forest type on carbon stock (H= 16.81, p < .001), whereas ecological zone (H= 0.18, p= .914) and the forest type × zone interaction (H= 0.03, p= .987) were not significant. Correlation analyses indicated no significant relationships between total carbon stock and tree density or average basal area in either natural (r= .01–.48, p > .05) or planted forests (r= .32–.38, p > .05). These results demonstrate clear differences in carbon stock between natural and planted mangrove forest types.

Abdul-Hamid, Mohamad-Ismail, Mohamed J. 2022. Allometric equation for aboveground biomass estimation of mixed mature mangrove forest. Forests 13(2), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020325

Aguilera, Díaz-Gaona, García-Laureano. 2020. Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region: A review. Agricultural Systems 181, 102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102809

Alimbon J, Manseguiao A. 2021. Species composition, stand characteristics, aboveground biomass, and carbon stock of mangroves in Panabo Mangrove Park, Philippines. Biodiversitas 22(6), 3130-3137. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220615

Alongi DM. 2018. Carbon sequestration in mangrove forests. Carbon Management 9(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1512737

Arifanti VB, Kauffman JB, Subarno, Ilman M, Tosiani A, Novita N. 2022. Contributions of mangrove conservation and restoration to climate change mitigation in Indonesia. Global Change Biology 28(15), 4523–4538. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16216

Bersaldo MJI. 2023. Biomass estimates using species-specific allometry in reforested mangrove areas of Malita, Davao Occidental, Philippines. SSRN Electronic Journal. Posted 21 March 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4395390

Bindu G, Rajan P, Jishnu ES, Ajith Joseph K. 2020. Carbon stock assessment of mangroves using remote sensing and geographic information system. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 23(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.04.006

Donato DC. 2011. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nature Geoscience 4(5), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123

Hadiyanto H, Rahman Halim MA, Muhammad F, Soeprobowati T, Sularto S. 2021. Potential for environmental services based on the estimation of reserved carbon in the Mangunharjo mangrove ecosystem. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 30(4), 3545–3552. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/126374

Hamilton SE, Friess DA. 2018. Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012. Nature Climate Change 8(3), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0090-4

Idrus A. 2019. The diversity of fauna in mangrove community: success replanting of mangrove species in south coastal East Lombok, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402(3), 033042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033042

IPCC. 2006. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: agriculture, forestry, and other land use. https://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_307012

Jerath M. 2016. The role of economic, policy, and ecological factors in estimating the value of carbon stocks in Everglades mangrove forests, South Florida, USA. Environmental Science and Policy 66, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.005

Komiyama A. 2005. Common allometric equations for estimating the tree weight of mangroves. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21(4), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467405002476

Lang AK. 2025. Bulk density calculation methods systematically alter estimates of soil organic carbon stocks in United States forests. Biogeochemistry 168(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-025-01235-6

Li C. 2016. Deep soil C, N, and P stocks and stoichiometry in response to land use patterns in the Loess Hilly region of China. PLoS ONE 11(7), e0159075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159075

Lomoljo-Bantayan NA. 2023. Carbon stock assessment of mangrove forests along Macajalar Bay, Misamis Oriental, Philippines. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 10(10), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.10.004

Lu W, Yang S, Chen L, Wang W, Du X, Wang C, Ma Y, Lin G, Lin G. 2014. Changes in carbon pool and stand structure of a native subtropical mangrove forest after inter-planting with exotic species Sonneratia apetala. PLoS ONE 9(3), e91238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091238

Meng Y. 2021. Relationships between above- and below-ground carbon stocks in mangrove forests facilitate better estimation of total mangrove blue carbon. Carbon Balance and Management 16(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00172-9

Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: part 3-chemical methods, 961–1010. Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34

Odeny D. 2019. Impact of climate change on species distribution and carbon storage of agroforestry trees on isolated East African mountains. American Journal of Climate Change 8(3), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2019.83020

Pearson TRH. 2007. Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-18

Pendleton L. 2012. Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS ONE 7(9), e43542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043542 

Primavera JH. 2008. A review of mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines: successes, failures and future prospects. Wetlands Ecology and Management 16(5), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9101-y

Primavera JH. 2019. The mangrove ecosystem. In: World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation, 1–34. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012-805052-1.00001-2

Rozainah MZ. 2018. Estimation of carbon pool in soil, above and below-ground vegetation at different types of mangrove forests in Peninsular Malaysia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 137, 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.023

Sharma S. 2023. Carbon stocks and fluxes in Asia-Pacific mangroves: current knowledge and gaps. Environmental Research Letters 18(4), 044002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acbf6c

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.