Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Review Paper | June 1, 2017

VIEWS 3
| Download

Accessibility measurement techniques in urban studies: a comprehensive review

Elahe Anjomshoaa, Hasanuddin Bin Lamit, Arezou Shafaghat, Tareef Hayat Khan, Sharifah Salwa Bt Syed Mahdzar

Key Words:


J. Bio. Env. Sci.10(6), 92-106, June 2017

Certification:

JBES 2017 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The concept of accessibility has been used in a number of scientific fields during the last few decades such as transport planning, urban planning and geography, and plays an important role in policy making. It expresses what possibly the major function of cities is; i.e. providing opportunities for easy interaction or exchange. In this study we attempted to present a comprehensive review on different techniques provided by different experts for measurement of accessibility in literature. First we summarized different accessibility measurement perspectives and components, and then we reviewed the different accessibility measures. A look at the literature revealed a wealth of information regarding the theory and specific construction of accessibility measures, which can help policy makers gain a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each method when they are used for urban planning and management.

VIEWS 3

Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Accessibility measurement techniques in urban studies: a comprehensive review

Apparicio P, Abdelmajid M, Riva M, Shearmur R. 2008. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(1),7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-7-7

Arentze TA, Borgers AWJ, Timmermans HJP. 1994. Multistop-based measurements of accessibility in a GTS environment. International Journal Of Geographical Information Systems, 8(4), 343-356.

Axhausen KW. 2007. Activity Spaces, Biographies, Social Networks and Their Welfare Gains and Externalities: Some Hypotheses and Empirical Results. Mobilities, 2(1), 15–36.

Baradaran S, Ramjerdi F. 2001. Performance of accessibility measures in Europe. Journal of Transportation Statistics, 4, 31-48.

Bhat C, Handy S, Kockelman K, Mahmassani H, Chen Q, Srour I, Weston L. 2000. Development of an Urban Accessibility Index: Literature Review. Technical Report No.TX-01/7-4938-1, Texas Department of Transportation. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin (TX), USA. Retrieved from: www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/REPORTS/4938_1.pdf

Foti F, Waddell P, Luxen D. 2012. A Generalized Computational Framework for Accessibility: From the Pedestrian to the Metropolitan Scale. 4th Transportation Research Board Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling (ITM), Tampa, Florida, USA.

Geertman SCM, and van Eck JR. 1995. GIS and Models of Accessibility Potential: An Application in Planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(1), 67-80.

Geisberger R. 2011. Advanced Route Planning in Transportation Networks. PhD thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, 1-227.

Geurs KT, van Eck JR. 2003. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: the implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(1), 69-87.

Geurs KT, van Wee B. 2004. Accessibility Evaluation of Land-Use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140.

Handy S, Niemeier DA. 1997. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29, 1175–1194.

Hägerstrand T. 1970. What about people in regional science? Presidential address to the Ninth European Congress of the Regional Science Association, In: Journal of Regional Science Association International, 23(1), 6-21.

Hansen W. 1959. How accessibility shape land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73-76.

Ingram DR. 1971. The Concept of Accessibility: A Search for an Operational Form. Regional Studies, 5,101-107.

Joseph AE, Bantock PR.1982. Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: A method and case study, Social Science and Medicine, 16(1), 85-90.

Koenig JG. 1980. Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation, 9(2), 145-172.

Kwan MP. 1998. Space-Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-based Framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(3), 191-216.

Litman T. 2007. Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved from: www.vtpi.org/access.pdf .

Litman TA. 2016. Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning; Measuring People’s Ability to Reach Desired Goods and Activities. Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, p. 1-56.

Miller HJ. 1991. Modelling Accessibility Using Space-Time Prism Concepts within Geographical Information Systems. International Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(3), 287-301.

Niemeier DA. 1997. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare, Transportation, 24(4), 377-396.

Pirie GH. 1979. Measuring accessibility: A review and proposal. Environment and Planning A. 11, 299-312.

Song S. 1996. Some Tests of Alternative Accessibility Measures: A Population Density Approach. Land Economics, 72(4), 474-482.

Tal G, Handy S. 2011. Measuring Non-motorized Accessibility and Connectivity in a Robust Pedestrian Network. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2299, 48-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2299-06

Wachs M, Kumagai TG. 1972. Physical accessibility as a social indicator, Socio-Economic Planning Science 7, 437-456.

Wang D, Timmermans H. 1996. Activity-based measures of accessibility for transportation policy analysis. Proceedings of Transportation Planning Methods seminar at the PTRC European Transport Forum, Brunel University, England, p.  404-2.

Weibull JW. 1976. An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 6(4), 357-379.

Zhang S, Zhang Y.  2015. Analysis of Network Accessibility. In: Wong W. (eds). Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 355. Springer, Cham.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background