Agronomic performance of the newly pruned coffee trees at the CSU Lal-lo old coffee plantation

Paper Details

Research Paper 21/11/2025
Views (271)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Agronomic performance of the newly pruned coffee trees at the CSU Lal-lo old coffee plantation

Maribel L. Fernandez, Florante Victor M. Balatico, Ronel A. Collado
Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 217-224, November 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Pruning is a strategy employed in many areas to rejuvenate coffee plants and increase berry production. The study was conducted at Cagayan State University, Lal-lo, Philippines, from May, 2021 to June, 2023, focused on rejuvenating old coffee trees through full stumping method for sustainable production. The study evaluated the agronomic performance of newly pruned coffee trees which includes plant height, leaf length, number of leaves, stem girth and Leaf Area Index (LAI). A Randomized Complete Block Design and five treatments was employed across five hectares of newly pruned coffee trees, with 20 sample trees per hectare and three blocks. Treatments included: T1-all epicormic shoots permitted to grow, T2-two robust epicormic shoots retained at 1.5 m, T3-four robust epicormic shoots retained at 1.5 m, T4-two robust epicormic shoots grown to maximum height and T5-four robust epicormic shoots grown to maximum height. Insignificant differences were observed in plant height at 30 days after pruning (DAP), number of leaves at 30–90 DAP, stem girth at 30–150 DAP, and LAI at 30 DAP. However, significant results were noted in plant height at 60–150 DAP, number of leaves at 120–150 DAP, leaf length at 30–150 DAP, and LAI at 60–150 DAP. Treatment T4 achieved the best results in plant height, leaf number, stem girth, leaf length, and LAI, comparable to T1. The study recommends adopting T4 for optimal growth and suggests to conduct same study on yield performance of the newly pruned coffee trees and further trials during the dry season for more conclusive findings.

Alemu MM. 2015. Effect of Tree Shade on Coffee Crop Production. Journal of Sustainable Development 8(9),  66. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n9p66

Azizah FR, Prayogo C, Kurniawan S, Rowe, RL. 2023. Microbial Biomass and Soil Respiration Response to Pruning and Fertilization Practices in Coffee-Pine Agroforestry. Journal of Ecological Engineering 24(8), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/167417

Cahyono ED, Fairuzzana S, Willianto D, Pradesti E, McNamara NP, Rowe RL, Van Noordwijk M. 2020. Agroforestry innovation through planned farmer behavior: Trimming in pine–coffee systems. Land 9(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100363

Cahyono ED, Pradesti E, Prayogo C, Suhartini, Isaskar R. 2023. Exploring the Relative Advantages of Local Innovation in Agroforestry. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and  Engineering 10(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022476

Desrochers A, Maurin V,  Tarroux  E. 2015. Production and role of epicormic shoots in pruned hybrid poplar: effects of clone, pruning season and intensity. Annals of Forest Science 72(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0443-8

Dufour  BP, Kerana  IW, Ribeyre F. 2019. Effect of coffee tree pruning on berry production and coffee berry borer infestation in the Toba Highlands (North Sumatra). Crop Protection 122, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.05.003

Fini A, Frangi P, Faoro M, Piatti R, Amoroso G, Ferrini F. 2015. Effects of different pruning methods on an urban tree species: A four-year-experiment scaling down from the whole tree to the chloroplasts. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 14(3), 664–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.011

Franck N, Vaast P. 2009. Limitation of coffee leaf photosynthesis by stomatal conductance and light availability under different shade levels. Trees- Structure and Function 23(4), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0318-z

Gonzaga AB, Gonzaga NR, Pimentel EL. 2021. Productivity of ‘Robusta’ coffee trees in response to different pruning systems in an acid upland soil. Acta Horticulturae 1312,  269-276. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1312.39

Jezeer RE, Santos MJ, Boot RGA, Junginger M, Verweij PA. 2018. Effects of shade and input management on economic performance of small-scale Peruvian coffee systems. Agricultural Systems 162, 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.014

Karim A, Hifnalisa H, Manfarizah M. 2021. Analysis of arabica coffee productivity due to shading, pruning, and coffee pulp-husk organic fertilizers treatments. Coffee Science 16, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.25186/.v16i.1903

Khayati N, Wachjar A, Sudarsono A. 2020. Pengelolaan Pemangkasan Tanaman Kopi Arabika (Coffea arabica L.) di Kebun Kalisat Jampit, PT Perkebunan Nusantara XII (Persero), Bondowoso, Jawa Timur. Buletin Agrohorti 7(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.29244/agrob.v7i3.30531

Muliasari M, Dewi RK,  Rochmah HF, Malala AR, Adinurani PG. 2021.  Improvement Generative Growth of Coffea arabica L. Using Plant Growth Regulators and Pruning. E3S Web of Conferences 226, 00003 .ICoN BEAT 2019. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202122600003

Rohani RTS, Prayogo C, Suprayogo D,  Wicaksono KS. 2024. The Effect of Coffee Canopy Pruning and Fertilization on Coffee Growth and Soil Physical Properties. Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology 8(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.55043/jaast.v8i1.208

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.