Altitude and soil properties affected grassland and weed distribution

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2014
Views (189) Download (8)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Altitude and soil properties affected grassland and weed distribution

Elham Abbasvand, Sirous Hassannejad, Jalil Shafagh-Kolvanagh, Saied Zehtab Salmasi
J. Bio. Env. Sci.4( 6), 231-235, June 2014.
Certificate: JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Altitude and soil properties can influence vegetation community and their density in rangelands. Knowing the relationships between plant species distribution with environmental factors would allow choosing the best strategy for the moderate of plants. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between plant species density with altitude and soil parameters in Khalatposhan rangeland in Tabriz-Iran. For this reason, grids of 20 m x 40 m were established in this rangeland, and soil samples were collected at the intersection points for physical and chemical analysis, also altitude for this points was measured by GPS. The canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) used for assesses the effects of some soil factors and altitude on grassland species and weeds distribution. Results showed that altitude as an environmental factor and pH, electrical conductivity, phosphorus and potassium as soil factors had the most effect on grassland plants and weeds distributions. Lepidium vesicarium L. had the most correlation with altitude. In contrast, increasing of altitude was caused that the density of some species likes Alyssum dasycarpum stapf and Rochelia macrocalyx Bge. reduced. Increasing of nitrogen and organic material led to increasing of some plants density likes Allium ampeloprasum L., Astragalus (Tragacantha) parrowianus, Chenopodium album L. and Salsola kali L. subsp. Tragus (L.) Nyman, but, density of Lolium rigidum Gaudin declined in these conditions. As a result of this study CCA analysis is necessary to find relationships between environmental factors and weed species distribution.

VIEWS 3

Andreasen C, Skovgaard IM. 2009. Crop and soil factors of importance for the distribution of plant species on arable fields in Denmark. Agric Ecosys Environ. 133, 61–67.

Begon  M,  Harper  JL,  Townsend  CR.  1990. Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Blackwell.

Cannone N, Wagner D, Hubberten HW, Guglielmin M. 2008. Biotic and abiotic factors influencing soil properties across a latitudinal gradient in Victoria Land, Antarctica. Geoderma, 144, 50–65.

Davis PH. 1965–85. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, volume 1–9. Edinburgh: University Press.

Engler R, Guisan A, MigClim. 2009. Predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 590-601.

Fried G, Norton LR, Rebound X. 2008. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agric Ecosys Environ. 128, 68–76.

Gomaa NH.  2012.  Composition  and  diversity  of weed communities in Al-Jouf province, northernSaudi Arabia. Saudi J Bio Sci. 19, 369–376.

Graham CH, Smith TB, Languy M. 2005. Current and historical factors influencing patterns of species richness and turnover of birds in the Gulf of Guinea Highlands.Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1371–1384.

Hassannejad S, PorheidarGhafarbi S. 2013. Weed flora survey in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) fields of Shabestar (northwest of Iran). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 971-991.

Lousada LL, Freitas, SP, Marciano CR, Bsteves BS, Muniz RA, Siqueira D. 2013. Correlation of soil properties with weed ocurrence in sugarcane areas. Planta Daninha, 31(4). 765-775.

Iwara  AI,  Gani  BS,  Njar  GN,  Deekor  TN. Influence of soil physico-chemical properties on the distribution of woody tree/shurb species in South-Southern Nigeria. Journal Agricultural Science., 2(2), 69-75, 2011.

Izquierdo JM, Blanco-Moreno J, Chamorro L, Recasens J, Sans FX. 2009. Spatial distribution and temporal stability of prostrate knotweed (Polygonum aviculare) and corn poppy (Papaverrhoeas) seed bank in a cereal field. Weed Science v. 57, p. 505-511.

NRC (National Reserach Council). 1999 Precision Agriculture in the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC: 149 p.

Pinke G, Karacsony P, Czucz B, Botta-Dukat Z, Lengyel A. 2012. The influence of environment, management and site context on species composition of summer arable weed vegetation in Hungary. Applied Vegetation Science. 15, 136–144.

Pysek P, Kucera T, Jarosik V. 2002. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biol Conserv. 104, 13–24.

Rechinger KH. 1963–2007. Flora Iranica. Graz (Austria): Akademische Durck- und. Verlagsanstalt; p. 1–178.

Sperry JS, Hacke UG, 2002. Desert shrub water relations with respect to soil characteristics and plant functional type. Funct. Ecol. 16, 367–378.

Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P, 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual for User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.0). Microcomputer Power (Ithaca, NY, USA), 352 pp.

Udoh BT, Ogunkunle AO, Ndaeyo NU. 2007. Influence of soil series and physico-chemical properties on weed flora distribution at Moor Plantation Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. J AgriSocSci, 3(2), 55- 58.

Zare S, Jafari M, Tavili A, Abbasi H, Rostampour M. 2011. Relationship between environmental factors and plant distribution in arid and semi-arid area (Case Study: Shahriyar Rangelands, Iran). American-Eurasian J Agric and Environ Science, 10(1), 97-105.