Ambient air quality assessment and modelling across phases of road construction: A case study of the Jalgaon-Bhadgaon state highway, India

Paper Details

Research Paper 05/07/2026
Views (141)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Ambient air quality assessment and modelling across phases of road construction: A case study of the Jalgaon-Bhadgaon state highway, India

Anilkumar Dattatray Shimpi*, Ashok Maruti Datir, Pravin Mukund Nalawade
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 17-23, July 2026.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Highway construction, a critical driver of economic growth in developing nations like India, is a significant but understudied source of ambient air pollution. While numerous studies have modelled urban air quality, a gap exists in phase-specific, empirical assessments of pollution from road construction activities. This study presents a detailed assessment of ambient air quality across all construction phases of the Jalgaon-Bhadgaon State Highway (NH-753J), Maharashtra. Monitoring of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, and CO was conducted at seven strategic locations (including intersections and straight sections) using High-Volume Samplers following CPCB guidelines. Results indicate that initial phases, Cleaning & Grubbing, Granular Sub-Base, and Wet Mix Macadam, were the most polluting, with PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations exceeding National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) by up to 169%. Major intersections showed 30-45% higher pollution levels compared to straight sections due to vehicular congestion. A significant surge in CO levels (5-7 ppm) was recorded during asphalt-related activities (Base and Top Coat). The study concludes that pollution mitigation efforts, such as mandatory water sprinkling and optimised traffic management, must be phase-specific and focused on high-risk zones like junctions. This research provides a robust dataset for validating air quality models and formulating targeted policies for sustainable infrastructure development.

Amarullah FH, Prasetijo J, Nurhafiza Y. 2022. Analysis of air pollution due to construction activities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1108(1), Article 012034.

Ammann J, Arias R, Amon B, Greiner B, John T. 2023. Emission factors for real-world construction equipment. Atmospheric Environment 301, Article 119712.

Cement Sustainability Initiative. 2019. Environmental Emissions and Energy Use in the Cement Industry. World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

Central Pollution Control Board. 2019. National Ambient Air Quality Status and Trends (NAAQMS/45/2019–20). Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India.

Ehsan S, Ouf MM, El-Rayes K. 2023. A review of emissions from asphalt pavement construction. Journal of Cleaner Production 382, Article 135234.

Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Section 13.2.1: Paved Roads. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Goel R, Gani S, Guttikunda SK, Tiwari S, Mishra P. 2022. Traffic congestion and signalized intersections as hotspots for air pollution. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 102, Article 103140.

Guttikunda SK, Calori G. 2019. A GIS-based emissions inventory for Delhi. Urban Climate 28, Article 100461.

Guttikunda SK, Mohan D. 2014. Re-fueling road transport for better air quality in India. Energy Policy 68, 556–561.

Liu Y, Chen H, Wu S, Gao J, Li Y, An Z, Tu R. 2023. Characteristics and health risks of construction equipment emissions. Science of the Total Environment 857(Part 1), Article 159353.

Ministry of Finance, Government of India. 2021. National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP) Report.

Nega T, Agyemang EO, Osei FB. 2022. Assessment of particulate matter concentrations during road construction in Ghana. Discover Environment 1(1), Article 4.

Sharma M, Dikshit O. 2016. Comprehensive Study on Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) in Delhi. Final report. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.