J. Bio. Env. Sci.4(6), 308-314, June 2014
Nowadays in situ geotechnical tests are used by the geotechnical engineers in a variety of forms. The SPT test, due to the simplicity, low cost, and association with other soil parameters, is using widely in engineering projects. The results of this test are associated with only a point, while the project engineers need information about the whole project area, especially the places with not samples. Therefore, using of geostatistical and interpolation methods to produce maps of soil engineering parameters is very common. In this research, the examined results of SPT in 18 study boreholes within the area of Chehel Baze national park of Mashhad city, according to blows change from 10 to 50, using geostatistical methods and general Kriging tool, the map of SPT changes and the estimation error maps was prepared. According to the results, it seems that geostatistical methods due to the acceptable precision and nature of geotechnical parameters, is a useful tool for predicting the number of SPT for area that tested data is not available.
ASTM D 1586. 2011. Approved November 1. Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT).
Basarir H, Kumral M, Karpuz C, Tutluoglu L. 2010. Geostatistical modeling of spatial variability of SPT data for a borax stockpile site, Journal of Engineering Geology, 114, 154-163.
Broms BB, Flodin N. 1990. History of soil penetration testing: Proc 1st International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, 20–24 March 1988 V1, P157–220. Rotterdam: AA Balkema, 1988. In International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts Vol. 27(2), p. A91. Pergamon.
Davidovic N, Prolovic V. Stojic D. 2010. Modeling soil parameters spatial uncertainty by geostatistics. Journal of The Architecture and Civil Engineering, 8(10), 111-118.
Flipo N, Jeannee N, Poulin M, Even S, Ledous E. 2007. Assessment of nitrate pollution in the Grand Morin aquifers (France): Combined use of geostatistics and physically based modeling. Environmental Pollution Journal, 146, 241 – 256 pp.
Hassanipak AA. 2006. Geostatistics. Tehran/ University, 330p (In Persian).
Hooshmand A, Delghandi M, Izadi A, Ahmadi K. 2011. Application of Kriging and Cokriging in spatial estimation of groundwater quality parameters. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (14), 3402– 3408.
Jahd Azma Consulting Engineers, 2013. Geotecnics Report of Chehel Bazeh national park. 196 p. (in Persian).
Krige DG. 1951. Statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. Journal of The Chemical, Metallurgical And Mining Society of South Africa, 52, 119-139.
Lashkaripour GH, Ghafoori M, Bagherpour Moghadam A, Talebiyan l. 2007. Effect of the groundwater decline on the land subsidence (case study: Mashhad plain). Proceedings of The First Applied Geology Congress. 916–922 pp (In Persian).
Matheron G. 1962. Using of Applied Geostatistics. Report of Geostatistical Research unites. Vol 14, Technic. Paris.
Taghizadeh Mehrjerdi R, Zareian Jahromi M, Mahmodi sh, Heidari A. 2008. Spatial distribution of groundwater quality with geostatistics (case study: Yazd–Ardakan plain). World Applied Science Journal, 4 (1), 9 – 17.
Vatanpour N, Ghafoori M, Lashkaripour GR. 2011. Assessment of physical and mechanical soil properties in Abaspour energy tunnel. Proceedings of the 30 rd. Symposium of Geosciences. 223 – 230 pp (In Persian).
Walter C, McBratney B. 2001. Spatial prediction of topsoil salinity in the chelif valley , Algeria, using local ordinary Kriging with local Variogram. Australian Journal of soil Research, 39(2), 248 – 259.