Analysis of the aquifer vulnerability of a Miopliocene arid area using DRASTIC and SI models.
Paper Details
Analysis of the aquifer vulnerability of a Miopliocene arid area using DRASTIC and SI models.
Abstract
Many methods in the groundwater vulnerability have been developed in the world (methods PRAST, DRIST, APRON/ARAA, PRASTCHIM, GOD). In this study, our choice dealt with two recent complementary methods using category mapping of index with weighting criteria (Point County Systems Model MSCP) namely the standard DRASTIC method and SI (Susceptibility Index). At present, these two methods are the most used for the mapping of the intrinsic vulnerability of groundwater. Two classes of groundwater vulnerability in the Biskra sandy aquifer were identified by the DRASTIC method (average and high) and the SI method (very high and high). Integrated analysis has revealed that the high class is predominant for the DRASTIC method whereas for that of SI the preponderance is for the very high class. Furthermore, we notice that the method SI estimates better the vulnerability for the pollution in nitrates, with a rate of 85% between the concentrations in nitrates of groundwater and the various established classes of vulnerability, against 75% for the DRASTIC method by including the land use parameter, the SI method produced more realistic results.
Agence Nationale des Ressources Hydriques (ANRH). 2002. Carte d’inventaire des points d’eau dans la wilaya de Biskra Algérie.
Aké GE, Dongo K, Kouadio BH, Dibi B, Saley MB, Biemi J. 2009. Contribution des méthodes de vulnérabilité intrinsèque DRASTIC et GOD à l’étude de la pollution par les nitrates dans la région de Bonoua (Sud-Est de la Côte d’Ivoire). European Journal of Scientific Research 31(1), 157-171.
Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G. 1987. DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrog-eological setting. EPA/600/2-87/035. US Env. Protection Agency 163 p.
Bézèlgues S, Des-Garets E, Mardhel V, Dörfliger N. 2002. Cartographie de la vulnérabilité de Grand-Terre et de Marie-Galatie (Guadeloupe). Phase 1: méthodologie de détermination de la vulnérabilité 45 p.
Chebbah M. 2007. Lithostratigraphie, Sédimentologie et modèles de bassins des dépôts néogènes de la région de Biskra, de part et d’autre de l’Accident Sud Atlasique. Thèse de Doctorat d’état, Université Mentouri, Constantine, Algérie 410 p.
Cornet A. 1964. Introduction à l’hydrogéologie saharienne, Revue de géographie physique et de géologie dynamique 2, Vol. VI, Fasc. 1, 5-72. Djabri L. 2012. Etats de la qualité des eaux en Algérie. XIIème Journée Nationale Génie Côtier – Génie Civil. Cherbourg, 12-14 juin 2012. France.
Engel BA, Navulur KCS, Cooper BS, Hahn L. 1996. Estimating groundwater vulnerability to non-point source pollution from nitrates and pesticides on a regional scale. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci 235, 521-526.
Hamza MH, Added A, Frances A, Rodriguez R. 2007. Validité de l’application des méthodes de vulnérabilité DRASTIC, SINTACS et SI à l’étude de la pollution par les nitrates dans la nappe phréatique de Metline-Ras Jebel-Raf Raf (Nord-Est Tunisien). Geoscience 339, 493-505.
Jourda JP, Kouame KJ, Adja MG, Deh SK, Anani AT, Effini AT, Biemi J. 2007. Evaluation du degré de protection des eaux souterraines: vulnérabilité à la pollution de la nappe de Bonoua (Sud-Est de la Côte d’Ivoire) par la méthode DRASTIC. Actes de la Conférence Francophone. SIG 2007/10 au 11 Octobre 2007, Versailles-France 11p.
Kaliraj S, Chandrasekar N, Peter TS. Selvaku-mar S, Magesh NS. 2015. Mapping of coastal aquifer vulnerable zone in the south west coast of Kanyakumari, South India, using GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environnemental monitoring and sassement 187(1), 1-27.
Lallemand-Barrès A. 1994. Normalisation des critères d’établissement des cartes de vulnérabilité aux pollutions. Etude documentaire préliminaire. Orléans BRGM (édition). France 128 p.
Mebarki A. 2009. Ressources en eau et aménagement en Algérie. Les bassins hydrographiques de l’Est. OPU, Alger 389 p.
Neubert S, Scheumann W, Kipping M. 2008. Water Politics, Policies and Development Cooperation: Local Power play and Global Governance, Springer, Geosciences 416 pages.
Oliveira M, Lobo-Ferreira JP. 2005. Análise de sensibilidade de aplicação de métodos indexados de avaliação da vulnerabilidade à poluição de águas subterrâneas no sul da península Ibérica, APRH (Édit-eurs), Lisbonne, Portugal 239-252.
Osborn NI, Eckenstein E, and Koon KQ. 1998. Vulnerability Assessment of Twelve Major Aquifers in Oklahoma: Oklahoma Water Resources Board Technical Report 98-5, 36 p.
Prévil C, Thériault M, Rouffignat J. 2003. Analyse multicritère et SIG pour faciliter la concertation en aménagement du territoire : vers une amélioration du processus décisionnel. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, vol 47, 130, 35-61.
Pusatli TO, Camur ZM, Yazicigil H. 2009. Susceptibility indexing method for irrigation water management planning: applications to K. Menderes river basin, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 90, 1, 341-347.
Ribeiro L. 2000. Desenvolvimento de um índice para avaliar a susceptibilidade dos aquíferos à contaminação. Nota interna, (Não publicada), ERSHA-CVRM 8 p.
Sadat-Noori M, Ebrahimi K. 2016. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in agricultural areas using a modified DRASTIC model. Environmental monitoring and assessment 188(1), 1-18.
Saidi S, Bouri S, Ben Dhia H, Anselme B. 2009. A GIS-based susceptibility indexing method for irrigation and drinking water management planning: Application to Chebba–Mellouleche Aquifer, Tunisia. Agricultural Water Management 96, 1683-1690.
Stigter TY, Ribeiro L, Carvalho-Dill AMM, 2006. Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal, Hydrogeol J. 14, 79-99.
Word Health Organisation (WHO). 2006. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Recommendations, 3rd edition 595 p.
Habiba Majour, Larbi Djabri, Nassima Sedrati (2016), Analysis of the aquifer vulnerability of a Miopliocene arid area using DRASTIC and SI models.; JBES, V9, N4, October, P124-132
https://innspub.net/analysis-of-the-aquifer-vulnerability-of-a-miopliocene-arid-area-using-drastic-and-si-models/
Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0