Antimicrobial interaction of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis against some pathogenic bacteria

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2011
Views (433) Download (11)

Antimicrobial interaction of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis against some pathogenic bacteria

Khalisanni Khalid, Lee Hung Kiong, Zaira Zaman Chowdhury, Khalizani Khalid
Int. J. Biosci.1( 3), 39-44, June 2011.
Certificate: IJB 2011 [Generate Certificate]


A research was conducted to determine the interaction of antimicrobial compound produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis at various parameters against Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus. The results showed static effect of antimicrobial compound against the bacteria. Salmonella exhibited the highest inhibition zone of 20.00±1.23mm at selected Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis at initial substrate pH and temperature, but at different time of culturing period. Staphylococcus aureus showed the highest inhibition zone of 20.00±2.13mm at initial substrate pH 7.0, with Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis incubation temperature of 37⁰C at 168 hours. From the above findings, the optimum condition of antimicrobial compound production was 37⁰C of incubation temperature with pH 7 of initial substrate.


Alexander B, Patrick W, Stéphane M, Olivier J, Karine M, Jean WS, Dusko E, Alexei S. 2001. The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 11(5), 731-753.

Aly S, Cheik AT, Ouattara I, Bassole HN, Alfred ST. 2004. Antimicrobial activities of Lactic Acid Bacteria strains isolated from burkina faso fermented milk. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 3(3), 174-179

Cassandra DM, Annelies IJL, Sofie DM, Filip A, Wim S, Erick JV. 2004. Potential of selected lactic acid bacteria to produce food compatible antifungal metabolites. Microbiological Research 159, 339—346

Elliot JA, Collins MD, Pigott NE, Facklam RR. 1991. Differentiation of Lactococcus lactis and Lactococcus garviae from humans by comparison of whole-cell protein patterns. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 29, 2731-4.

Facklam RR, Elliot JA. 1995. Identification, classification, and clinical relevance of catalase-negative, gram-positive cocci, excluding streptococci and enterococci. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 8, 479-95.

Fefer JJ, Ratzan KR, Sharp SE, Saiz E. 1998. Lactococcus garvieae endocarditis: report of a case and review of the literature. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect Dis. 32, 127-30.

Franklin DL. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus Infections. The New England Journal of Medicine 339, 520-532

Fujitoshi   Y,   Yi-sheng   C,   Takashi   S.   2005. Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from soils in vineyard, Institute of Enology and Viticulture, University of Yamanashi. Journal of General Applied Microbiology 51, 313-318

John ET. 2002. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella: problems and perspectives in food- and water-borne infections. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26(2), 141–148

Kim OG, Mette N, Claus D, Henrik CS, Brian K, Tove E, Henrik N. 2008. Increased risk of zoonotic Salmonella and Campylobacter gastroenteritis in patients with haematological malignancies: a population-based study. Annals of Hematology 88(8), 761-767

Michael E, St. L, Dale LM, Morris EP, Thomas M, DeM. 1988. The emergence of grade A eggs as a major source of Salmonella enteritidis infections. The Journal of the American Medical Association 259(14), 2103-2107

Onilude AA, Fagade OE, Bello MM and Fadahunsi IF. 2005. Inhibition of aflatoxin-producing aspergilli by lactic acid bacteria isolates from indigenously fermented cereal gruels. African Journal of Biotechnology 4(12), 1404-1408.

Yasin RM, Jegathesan MM, Tiew CC. 1996. Salmonella serotypes isolated in Malaysia over the ten-year period 1983-1992. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 9, 1-5.