Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | April 1, 2014

VIEWS 1
| Download 2

Application of analytical hierarchy process in land suitability for forest park location (case study: Ilam county, Iran)

Zahra Nazeri, Javad Mirzaee, Ali Rostami

Key Words:


J. Bio. Env. Sci.4(4), 301-309, April 2014

Certification:

JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Currently, Human life is being sustained by recreation and leisure as they play an important role within the human lifestyles. Natural and forest park observed as recreational spaces have persistently received a greatest significance for pastime. This paper describes a GIS-based system that supports dynamic assessment of land suitability for forest park location in western Iran. Based on actual conditions of the study area, we considered affective factors, calculated criteria weights using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and built a hierarchy model for solving the forest park site selection problem in Ilam, Iran. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to manipulate and present spatial data. The maps prepared and reclassified and standardized using GIS. Finally, land suitability map for forest park location generated using WLC method and classified in 4 class including excellent suitability, moderate suitability, low suitability and not suitable. Result showed that 4.67% of the study area has excellent suitability for forest park location.

VIEWS 1

Copyright © 2014
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Application of analytical hierarchy process in land suitability for forest park location (case study: Ilam county, Iran)

Cay T, Uyan M. 2013. Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Land Use Policy 30, 541– 548. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.023

Chakraborty S, Banik D. 2006. Design of a material handling equipment selection model using analytic hierarchy process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 28, 1237–124.

Eastman JR, Weigen J, Kyem PAK, Toledano J. 1995. Raster procedures for multicriteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61, 539–547.

Gul AM, Orucu K, Oznur K. 2006. An approach for recreation suitability analysis to recreation planning in Golchuk Nature Park. Journal of Environmental Management 1, 606-625.

Kangas J. 1992. Multiple-use planning of forest resources by using the analytic hierarchy process. Scand. J. For. Res 7, 259–268. doi:10.1080/02827589209382718. 0 0.

Kumari S, Behera MD, Tewari HR. 2010. Identification of potential ecotourism sites in West District, Sikkim using geospatial tools. Tropical Ecology 51, 75-85.

Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M. 2000. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis –a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics 1, 41–52.

Lai W, Han-lun L, Jing-yi C, Yi-jiao C. 2011. Study and implementation of fire sites planning based on GIS and AHP. Physics Engineering 11, 486–495. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.687.

Lawal DU, Matori AN, Balogun AL. 2011. A Geographic Information System and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Proposing New Recreational Park Sites in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,Canadian Center of Science and Education, Modern Applied Science 5, 39-55.

Lynn NA, Brown RD. 2003. Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 64, 77–87.

Mahdavi A, Karami O, Mirzaei J. 2011. Evaluation of ecotourism capability of Badreh township-Ilam Provence using Geographic Information System, Iranian Journal of Natural Ecosystems of Iran 2, 63-74.

Majnunian H. 1995. Discussions about parks, green spaces and promenades. Department of parks and green spaces of Tehran city-Iran press, 251 pp.

Malczewski J. 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: J. Wiley & Sons. 392 pp.

Malczewski J. 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in Planning 62, 3-65. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2003.09.002

Mendoza GA, Sprouse W. 1989. Forest planning and decision making under fuzzy environments: an overview and illustrations. Forest Science 35 481–502.

Murray DM. Von Gadow K. 1991. Prioritizing mountain catchment areas. J. Environ. Manage 32, 357–366. doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80072-6

Pykala inen J, Kangas J, Loikkanen T. 1999. Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences from State owned boreal forests. J. For. Econ 5, 341–364.

Rauscher HM, Lloyd FT, Loftis DL, Twery MJ. 2000. Apractical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management. Comput. Electron. Agric 27, 195–226.

Saaty TL. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 287 pp.

Saaty TL. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Mathemat. Psych 15, 234–281.

Sharifi MA, Retsios V. 2004. Site selection for waste disposal through spatial multiple criteria decision analysis. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol 3, 28–38.

Svoray T, Bar P, Bannet T. 2005. Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: Habitat Heterogeneity Model incorporated in a GIS using a multi-criteria mechanism. Landscape and Urban Planning 72, 337–351

Vacik H, Lexer MJ. 2001. Application of a spatial decision support system in managing the protection forests of Vienna for sustained yield of water resources. For. Ecol. Manage 143, 65–76.

Vaidya OS, Kumar S. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169 1–29.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background