Application of biophysical and biochemical methods as priming techniques on Carthamus Tinctorius L.

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2014
Views (173) Download (5)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Application of biophysical and biochemical methods as priming techniques on Carthamus Tinctorius L.

Faride Faqenabi, Mehdi Tajbakhsh, Iraj Bernousi
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.4( 6), 27-33, June 2014.
Certificate: IJAAR 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

For disclosing the effects of seed priming with biophysical and biochemical methods on yield and other characteristics on safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.), the seeds of one safflower cultivar was treated with 72 mT strength for 10 min, hydro priming for 72 hours and gibberellic acid with 50ppm concentration for 8hours before germination and cultivation. In this experiment traits such as yield components, seed yield, biological yield, harvest index, petal yield, percentage of oil, percentage of huld seed and correlations were measured. Seed priming was significantly impressed characteristics under study. Plants showed that yield parameters and major traits were increased, in most cases, for magnetic treatment versus control (non-treated seeds) and other pre-treatments. Results indicated that biophysical methods (magnetic field) had greatest difference with biochemical methods and control at traits under study.

VIEWS 2

Blank M, Goodman R. 1996. Do electromagnetic interact directly with DNA?. Bioelectromagnetic 18, 111-115.

Demir-Kaya M, Okcu G, Atak M, Cikili Y, Kolsarici O. 2006. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drough stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus Annus L.). Europe Journal of Agronomy 1-5.

Eskandari H. 2011. Response of Sesame (Sesamum indicum) cultivars to hydro-priming of seeds. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences 1(12), 638-642.

Farooq M, Basra SMA, Ahmad N. 2007. Improving the performance of transplanted rice by seed priming. Plant Growth Regulation 51, 129-137.

Florez M, Martinez E, Carbonell MV. 2012. Effect of magnetic field treatment on germination of medicinal plants Salvia Officinalis L. and Calendula Officinalis L. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 21(1), 57-63.

Florez M, Carbonell MV, Martines E. 2005. Exposure of maize seeds to stationary magnetic fields: effects on germination and early growth. Journal of Environmental Experience in Botany 6, 1-13.

Ghassemi-Golezani K, Chadordooz-Jeddi A, Nasrullahzadeh S, Mohammad M. 2010. Influence of hydro-priming duration on field performance of pinto bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) cultivars. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(9), 893-897.

Goodman, EM, Greenabaum B, Morron TM. 1995. Effects of electromagnetic fields on molecules and cells. International Review of Cytology 158, 279-325.

Gusta LV, Oconnor BJ, La-fond GP, Austenson HM. 1994. The effect of fungicides and plant growth regulators applied as seed treatment on the freezing tolerance of winter wheat. Can. Journal of Plant Science 74, 63-69.

Hosseini M, Rahimzadeh-Khoei F, Mirshekari B. 2013a. Seed priming techniques improve germination and yield in two landraces of lemon balm in laboratory experiment and field study. International Journal of Indigenous Medicinal Plants 29(1), 1144-1150.

Hoseini M, Baser-Kouchebagh S, Jahandideh E. 2013b. Response of fennel to priming techniques. Journal of Annual Review & Research in Biology 3(2), 124-130.

Iimoto M, Watanebe K, Fujiwara K. 1996. Effects of magnetic flux density and direction of the magnetic field on growth and CO2 exchange rate of potato plantles. Acta Horticulturac 44, 606-610.

Jamil Y, Ui-haq Z, Igbal M, Perveen T, Amin N. 2012. Enhancement in growth and yield of mushroom using magnetic field treatment. International Agrophysics 26(4), 375-380.

Kaur S, Cupta AK, Kaur N. 2002. Effect of osmo and hydropriming of hickpea seeds on the performance of crop in the field. Int. Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter 9, 15-17.

Koranteng GO, Mattews S. 1982. Modification of the development of spring barley by early applications of CCC and GA3 and the subsequent effects on yield components and yield. In. J. S. Maclagon(ed). Chemicalmanipulation of Crop Growth and Development, Butterworth, London 343-357.

Kordas L. 2002. The effect of magnetic field on growth, development and the yield of spring wheat. Pakistan Journal of Environment 11(5), 527-530.

Leite VM, Rosolem CA, Rodrigue JD. 2003. Gibberehhic and cytokinin effects on soybean growth. Scientia Agricola 60, 537-541.

Ma BL, Smith DL. 1992. Growth regulator effects on above ground dry mather partitioning during grain fill of spring barley. Crop Science 32, 741-746.

Mohammadi GR. 2009. The effect of seed priming on plant traits of late-pring seeded soybean (Glycine Max L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture And Environmental Science 5(3), 322-326.

Mokhtassi BA, Akbar GA, Mirhadi MJ, Zand E, Soufizadeh S. 2006. Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phonological traits in safflower. Euphytica 48, 261-268.

Potter TI, Zanewich KP, Brood S. 1993. Gibberellin physiology of safflower: endogenous gibberellins and response to gibberellic acid. Plant Growth Regulation 12, 133-140.

Rashid A, Harris D, Hollington P, Shamsher A. 2004. On-farm seed priming reduces yield losses of mungbean (Vigna radiate) saaociated with mungbean yellow mosaic virus in the Niorth West Frontier Province of Pakistan. Crop Protection 23, 1119-1124.

Tajbakhsh M, Brown PH, Gracie AJ, Spurr CJ, Donovan N. 2004. Mitigation of stunted root abnormality in onion ( Allium Cepa L.) using seed priming treatments. Seed Science & Technology 232, 686-692.

Vasileviski G. 2003. Perspectives of the application of biophysical methods in sustainable agriculture. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology SI, 179-186.