Aquatic Insect Similarity Connecting Natural Wetland Habitat and Ricefield for Ecological Rice Production in Agusan Marsh in Mindanao, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2016
Views (440) Download (13)

Aquatic Insect Similarity Connecting Natural Wetland Habitat and Ricefield for Ecological Rice Production in Agusan Marsh in Mindanao, Philippines

Rowena P. Varela
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.9( 1), 140-147, July 2016.
Certificate: IJAAR 2016 [Generate Certificate]


This study describes the relationship of the natural wetland habitats in Agusan Marsh to nearby rice fields and its implication to ecological rice production. Aquatic insects play multiple roles in the ecosystem such as predators, prey to other animals and decomposers which help in maintaining ecological balance. Results revealed that the diversity of odonates was highest in the sedge-dominated swamp among natural habitats which corresponds to the adjoining ricefields. The pattern of clustering of odonates show 3 groups; the rice-sago and rice-sedges sub-cluster, the rice-bangkal, rice-Terminalia, rice-fern, bangkal, sago and sedges sub-cluster, and the Terminalia forest as the outlier. The diversity of semi-aquatic and aquatic bugs was highest in the Bangkal forest while the lowest was in the fern-dominated swamp. The pattern of clustering shows 2 sub-clusters and the outlier Bangkal forest. On aquatic beetles, highest diversity was in the Terminalia forest. The sub-cluster consists of Terminalia habitat and rice-fern, while the other sub-cluster includes rice-Bangkal and rice-Terminalia. The resulting patterns of similarity in diversity and distribution of species in natural habitats and nearby ricefields indicate that ricefields are important temporary habitats for some aquatic insect species and serve as stepping stones for the movement of the insects.


AMWS. 2001. Agusan Marsh Wildlife Sanctuary Management Plan. PAMB and DENR Caraga Region, Mindanao 114 p.

Balke M, Jach, MA and Hendrich, L. 2002. Water beetles of Malaysia (Coleoptera). Report on the Survey on Aquatic Insects in Malaysia.

Bambaradeniya CN, Amerasinghe FP. 2004. Biodiversity associated with the rice field agroecosystem in Asian countries: a brief review IWMI;

Barrion AT and Litsinger, JA. 1994. Biology and Management of Rice Insects. In: EA Heinreich (ed.).  Wiley and Sons Ltd., Delhi, India. pp 50-345.

Bennett AF, Radford JQ, Haslem A. 2006. Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biological Conservation 30, 133(2):250-64.

Chen PP, Nieser N, Zettel H. 2005. Aquatic and semi-aquatic bugs (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha & Gerromorpha) of Malesia Brill.

Elphick CS. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetland habitats. Conservation Biology 1, 14(1):181-91.

Fairchild GW, Cruz J, Faulds AM, Short AEZ Matta JF. 2003. Microhabitat and landscape influences on aquatic beetle assemblages in a cluster of temporary and permanent ponds. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22(2), pp. 224-240.

Foreman RTT, Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York 620 p.

Forman RT. 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape ecology 1, 10(3), 133-42.

Gapud, VP, Zettel H. 1999. “The Philippine Water Bug Inventory Project (PWBIP) and a bibliography for Philippine Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha, and Leptopodomorpha (Insecta: Heteroptera).” Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B für Botanik und Zoologie 35-40.

Hansen M. 1999. World catalogue of insects. Volume 2: Hydrophiloidea (s. str.) (Coleoptera). Apollo Books.

Lan LP, Huyen ND, Quang NH, Minh NV. 2001. Habitat diversity: an approach to the preservation of natural enemies of tropical irrigated rice insect pests. Exploiting Bidiversity for Sustainable Pest management (Eds., Mew, TW, Borromeo, E. and Hardy B.). 51-63.

Lawler SP. 2001. Rice fields as temporary wetlands: a review. Israel Journal of Zoology 1, 47(4), 513-28.

Liu Y, Duan M, Yu Z. 2013. Agricultural landscapes and biodiversity in China. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment 15, 166:46-54.

Ma Z, Li B, Zhao B, Jing K, Tang S, Chen J. 2004. Are artificial wetlands good alternatives to natural wetlands for waterbirds?–A case study on Chongming Island, China. Biodiversity & Conse-rvation 1, 13(2), 333-50.

Marcos TF, Flor LB, Velilla AR, Schoenly KG, Manalo JO, Ofilas OM, Teng PS, Ulep JR, Tinguil MB, Mew TW, Estoy AB. 2001. Relationships between pests and natural enemies in rainfed rice and associated crop and wild habitats in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. Exploiting biodiversity for sustainable pest management: Proceedings, Mew, TW, E. Borromeo, and B. Hardy (Eds.). Los Baños, Laguna (Philippines): IRRI 23-42.

Roger, PA. 1996. Biology and management of the floodwater ecosystem in rice fields. Int. Rice Res Inst.

Settle WH, Ariawan H, Astuti ET, Cahyana W, Hakim AL, Hindayana D, Lestari AS. Pajarningsih S. 1996. Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of general natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77, 1975-1988.

Shepard BM, Barrion AT. Litsinger JA.  2000. Helpful Insects, Spiders and Pathogens: Friends of the Rice Farmers. IRRI, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines 127 p.

Sutherland WJ.  1995. Introduction and principle of ecological management. p. 1-21. In: Sutherland WJ and DA Hill (eds.). Managing Habitats for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England.

Wilby A, Heong KL, Huyen NP, Quang NH, Minh NV, Thomas MB. 2006. Arthropod diversity and community structure in relation to land use in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Ecosystems 1, 9(4), 538-49.