Assessing biomass stability of barley (hordeum voulgar l.) genotypes under salinity at early growth stage

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2017
Views (880)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessing biomass stability of barley (hordeum voulgar l.) genotypes under salinity at early growth stage

Hossein Askari, Seiyed Kamal Kazemitabar, Hamid Najafi Zarrini, Mohammad Hossein Saberi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 10(6), 76-82, June 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

As a result, the development of salinity-tolerant crops is an important option for maintaining crop production in saline soil so this study was performed to assess tolerance, stability and selection criteria of barley genotypes under salinity stress. Nine barley genotypes (STW82153 (A), MBS8712 (B), ESBYTM8910 (C), 4Shori (D), 5Shori (E), WB7910 (F), Valfajr (G), MBS8715 (H) and Jo torsh (I)) in five salinity levels (electrical conductivities, ds/m) (S1 (control) =4.5, S2=7.5, S3=10.5, S4=13.5 and S5=16.5) were evaluated for biomass production. A green-house experiment was laid out in completely randomized design with three replications. Analysis of variance indicated high differences among the genotypes and salinity levels. Biomass production decreased with increasing salinity level and MBS8712 genotype showed better performance than other genotypes. Due to significant genotype × salt effect, for assessing genotypes reaction in salt levels some stability parameters were used. Most of the stability methods indicated that the 4Shori genotype was the most phenotypically stable with above-average performance. The results revealed both potential and performance under stress with stability should be considered simultaneously to take advantage of the selection desirable genotypes for stress tolerance.

Anley W, Habtamu Z, Yigzaw D. 2013. Genotype X environment interaction of maize (Zea mays L.) across North Western Ethiopia. J. Plant Breed. Crop Science 5, 171-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS2013.0406

Ashraf M, Harris PJC. 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. plant science. 166, 3-16.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.02.4

Becker HC, Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding. 101: 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14390523.1988.tb00261.x

Eberhart SA, Russell WA. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties, Crop Science. 6, 36-40.

Elakhdar A, Abd El-sattar M, Amer K, Kumamaru T. 2016. Genetic  diversity  and  association  analysis  among  Egyptian  barley  (Hordeum  vulgare  L.) genotypes with different adaptations to saline conditions analyzed by SSR markers.  Australian Journal of Crop Science 10, 637-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.05.p7331

Ferreira D, Demetrio C. 2006. Statistical models in agriculture: biometrical methods for evaluating phenotypic stability in plant breeding. CERNE. 12: 373-388.

Fritsche R, Borém A. 2005. Plant breeding for abiotic stress tolerance, Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. 

Khalili M, Pour-Aboughadareh A. 2016. Parametric and non-parametric measures for evaluating yield stability and adaptability in barley doubled haploid lines. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 18, 789-803

Mehari M, Alamerew S,  Lakew B,  Yirga H,  Tesfay M. 2014. Parametric Stability Analysis of Malt Barley Genotypes for Grain Yield in Tigray, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10, 210-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjas.2014.10.5.1822

Mohammadi R, Mahmoodi KN. 2008. Stability analysis of grain yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). internationa journal of plant breeding. 2, 74-78.

Sabaghnia N, Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R. 2013. Yield stability of performance in multi-environment trials of barley (Hordeum vulgar L.) genotypes. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 87, 787-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361030787

Turhan A, Seniz V. 2012. Salt tolerance during vegetative growth in cross of tomato and effect of cytoplasm in response to salt tolerance. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18, 207-218.

Verma MM, Chahal GS, Murty BR. 1978. Limitations of conventional regression analysis: a proposed modification. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 52, 89-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00817837

Wricke G. 1962. A method of understanding the biological diversity in field research. Z. Pfl.-zucht. 47, 92–96.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.