Assessing the water quality of upper Indus Basin (UIB) by framing water quality index (WQI)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2019
Views (850)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessing the water quality of upper Indus Basin (UIB) by framing water quality index (WQI)

Mansoor A. Baluch, Hashim Nisar
Int. J. Biosci. 14(1), 543-553, January 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The water quality of Indus River is badly affected due to higher concentrations of arsenic (As) and lead (Pb). In this study, multi criteria decision making technique is used to assess the water quality of upper Indus basin (UIB). Eight physico-chemical quality parameters from five regions of UIB were utilized to frame water quality index (WQI). Analysis on the basis of this adjusted WQI classify the quality of water into three bands identified as good (0-7), fair (8-20) and bad quality water (>20), respectively. Afterward this adjusted WQI was applied for assessing the water quality of UIB. Water Quality data which include the pH, DO, TDS, EC, salinity, ORP, As & Pb concentration of sixty four samples belonging to UIB was utilized for the purpose. The results in this study show that the new WQI is sensitive to As and Pb. A slight variation of As from WHO recommended values i.e. 10mg/l immediately reflected by index value. According to results obtained water quality of Indus River is seriously affected from As from its start. We hope that adjusted WQI reported in this study might serve as essential part of monitoring protocol to save this valuable water resource of Pakistan.

Ahmed M, Nazim K, Khan A, Siddiqui MF, Khan MU. 2017. Arsenic and Lead Level from Upper to Lower Indus Basin of Pakistan. FUUAST Journal of Biology 7, 183-191.

Brown RM, McClelland NI, Deininger RA, Tozer RG. 1970. A water quality index- Do we dare. Water Sewage Works 117, 339-343.

Cude CG. 2001. Oregon Water Quality Index a Tool for Evaluating Water Quality Management Effectiveness. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37, 125-137.

Dubois O. 2011. The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture: managing systems at risk. Earthscan, New York, NY, USA.

Goepel KD. 2013. Implementing the analytic hierarchy process as a standard method for multi-criteria decision making in corporate enterprises–a new AHP excel template with multiple inputs, Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process. Creative Decisions Foundation Kuala Lumpur pp. 1-10.

Hernández-Romero AH, Tovilla-Hernández C, Malo EA, Bello-Mendoza R. 2004. Water quality and presence of pesticides in a tropical coastal wetland in southern Mexico. Marine Pollution Bulletin 48, 1130-1141.

Horton RK. 1965. An index number system for rating water quality. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 37, 300-306.

Hughes MF, Beck BD, Chen Y, Lewis AS, Thomas DJ. 2011. Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective. Toxicological sciences : an official Journal of the Society of Toxicology 123, 305-332.

Jena V, Dixit S, Gupta S. 2013. Assessment of water quality index of industrial area surface water samples. International Journal of ChemTech Research 5, 278-283.

Karim A, Veizer J. 2000. Weathering processes in the Indus River Basin: implications from riverine carbon, sulfur, oxygen, and strontium isotopes. Chemical Geology 170, 153-177.

Mirzaei M, Nazari A, Yari A. 2005. quality zoning of Jajrood river. Journal of Environmental Studies 37,17-26.

Mirzaei M, Solgi E, Salman-Mahiny A. 2016. Evaluation of Surface Water Quality by NSFWQI Index and Pollution Risk Assessment, Using WRASTIC Index in 2015. Archives of Hygiene Sciences 5, 264-277.

Misaghi F, Delgosha F, Razzaghmanesh M, Myers B. 2017. Introducing a water quality index for assessing water for irrigation purposes: A case study of the Ghezel Ozan River. Science of the Total Environment 589, 107-116.

Priscoli JD. 2000. Water and civilization: using history to reframe water policy debates and to build a new ecological realism. Water Policy 1, 623-636.

Sharma MP, Sharma S, Goel V, Sharma P, Kumar A. 2006. Water quality assessment of Behta River using benthic macroinvertebrates. Life Science Journal 3, 68-74.

Shokuhi R, Hosinzadeh E, Roshanaei G, Alipour M, Hoseinzadeh S. 2012. Evaluation of Aydughmush dam reservoir water quality by National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index (NSF-WQI) and water quality parameter changes. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment 4, 439-450.

Terrado M, Barceló D, Tauler R, Borrell E, de Campos S. 2010. Surface-water-quality indices for the analysis of data generated by automated sampling networks. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29, 40-52.

Zandbergen PA. 1998. Urban watershed ecological risk assessment using GIS: a case study of the Brunette River watershed in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Hazardous materials 61, 163-173.

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.