Assessment of best feeding pattern for dairy buffalo in Bangladesh

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2021
Views (1222)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment of best feeding pattern for dairy buffalo in Bangladesh

Md. Ahsanul Kabir, Sardar Muhammad Amaanullah, Mahfidul Hassan, Gautam Kumar Deb, Sakila Jahan, S.M. Jahangir Hossain, Md. Moklesur Rahman, Md. Ruhul Amin
Int. J. Biosci. 18(3), 89-94, March 2021.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2021; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to compare three feeding patterns on dairy buffalo for investigating the effect of a balanced diet on milk production along with cost-benefit analysis. A total of 21 milking buffaloes were selected and feded according to three feeding patterns, one was existing feeding pattern (T0), another was a balanced feeding pattern (T1) where concentrate mixture was provided according to the nutrient requirement of milking buffalo and the third one was UMS based feeding pattern (T3) where the combination of concentrate mixture and urea molasses straw (UMS) were used according to the nutrient requirement of buffalo. Each group has a similar number of animals of the same parity and lactation stage. After completion of the experiment, it was found that there were significant variations (P<0.01) of nutrient intake among treatment groups. Higher DM intake was observed in the T1 group whereas higher CP and ADF intake were observed in the T2 groups. However, the highest NDF intake was observed in the control group which indicates dietary improvement. Dietary Improvement influence milk yield significantly (P<0.01) however milk composition was not changed. After simple economic analysis, it was observed that among three feeding patterns value of the Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was higher than 1 and the highest value was observed in the T2 feeding pattern. In the existing system, buffalo farmers were making a profit and they can make the highest profit if they practiced UMS based feeding pattern. Hence, the UMS based feeding system may more profitable feeding pattern for river buffalo in Bangladesh.

Biswas MAA, Hoque MN, Kibria MG, Rashid MH, Akther MM. 2010. Field trial and demonstration of urea molasses straw technology of feeding lactating animals. Bangladesh research publication journal. 3(4), 1129-1132.

Bulbul T. 2010. Energy and Nutrient requirements of Buffaloes, Review. Kocatepe veterinary journal 3(2), 55-64.

Duncan DB. 2013. Multiple range and multiple F-tests.Biometrics. 1955; 11, 1-42. Geo-Positioning System (GPS), Garmin extres 12 channel Garmin. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Dutta N, Sharma K, Naulia U. 2004. Nutritional evaluation of lentil (Lens culinaris) straw and urea treated wheat straw in goats and lactating buffaloes.  Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 17, 1529-1534. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.1529

Gunun P, Wanapat M, Anantasook N. 2013. Rumen Fermentation and Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows Affected by Physical Forms and Urea Treatment of Rice Straw. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 26(9), 1295-1303. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13094

Hamid MA, Ahmed S, Rahman MA, Hossain KM. 2016. Status of Buffalo Production in Bangladesh Compared to SAARC Countries. Asian journal of animal science 10(6) 313-329. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2016.313.329

Islam M, Huque KS. 1995. On Farm evaluation of urea molassesed straw (UMS) feeding to lactating cow. Asian Journal of Animal Science 8(5), 523-527. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1995.523

Islam S, Nahar TN, Begum J, Deb GK, Khatun M, Mustafa A. 2007. Economic Evaluation of Buffalo Production in Selected Regions of Bangladesh. Journal of Stock & Forex Trading 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9458.1000177

Manjari P, Hyder I, Uniyal S,  Houzha R, Rastogi SK. 2016. Adaptation of trrai buffaloes to seasonal variation as indicated by haematological profile. Buffalo Bulletin 35(2), 165-171.

Paul SS, Lal. 2010. Nutrient Requirements of Buffaloes.Satish serial publishing house. India. p. 97-99.

Prasad RDD, Reddy MR, Reddy GVN. 1998. Effect of feeding baled and stacked urea treated rice straw on the performance of crossbred cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 73(3-4), 347-352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00140-0

Rigout S, Hurtaud C, Lemosquet S, Bach A, Rulquin H. 2003. Lactational effect of propionic acid and duodenal glucose in cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 86, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73603-0

Sarwar M, Khan MA, Nisa M, Bhatti SA, Shahzad MA.2009. Nutritional Management for Buffalo Production. Asian-Australation Journal of Animal Science 22(7), 1060 – 1068. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.r.0.9

Tong XY, Fang W, Hong Li, Qing SL, Quan YL. 2013. The Nutrition of Buffalo Milk: A Comparison with Cow Milk. Advances in Chemcal Engineering III, Advanced Materials Research. 781-784, 1460-1463. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.781-784.1460.

Uddin MJ, Shahjalal M, Kabir F, Khan MH, Chowdhury SA. 2002. Beneficiary effect of feeding urea molasses treated straw on buffalo cow in Bangladesh. Online Journal of Biological Science. 2(6), 384-385. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.r.0.910.3923/jbs.2002.384.385

Related Articles

Intra-population genetic diversity modeling of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) population in Niger

Adamou Ibrahim Maman Laouali*, Zango Oumarou, Alio Moussa Abdourazak, Rafiou Abdoulaye, Idi Saidou Sani, Idi Garba Nana Mariama, Bakasso Yacoubou, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 62-70, September 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous Trichoderma isolates against Fusarium wilt of cotton in Tanzania: In vitro screening and screen-house validation

Fauzia Khalid Mpiganzila*, Alfonce Leonard, Lidia Munuo, Ernest Mbega, Agatha Aloyce, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 44-61, September 2026.

In vitro study of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antihyperglycemic activity of medicinal plants

T. K. Nishath*, P. Mathavi, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 32-43, September 2026.

Association between the IL13 rs1800925 (-1112C/T) polymorphism and Schistosoma mansoni infection intensity in a population from western Côte d’Ivoire

Bernardin Ahouty Ahouty*, Abla Edwige Sokouri, Georges Bohoussou Kassi, Innocent Allépo Abé, Martial Kassi N’djetchi, Yaya Ouangbo Ouattara, Ornella Karmelle Lydia Dago, Mathurin Yao Koffi, Thomas Konan Konan, Mathurin N’Goran Koffi, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 20-31, September 2026.

Abattoir-based surveillance reveals geographic clustering and risk factors for bovine tuberculosis in Tanzania

Yohana Siyajali Anatory*, Beatus Lyimo, Blandina T. Mmbaga, Joram Buza, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 11-19, September 2026.

In vitro assessment of the anticancer activity of quinaldic acid against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7)

N. Medhavi, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, K. Harish, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 1-10, September 2026.

In silico molecular docking analysis of quinaldic acid against cancer related targets

N. Medhavi, K. Harish, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, B. Vidhyambigai, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 129-139, August 2026.

First records of Macrogyrodactylus clarii and six species of Quadriacanthus (Monogenea) infecting Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) across four localities in Senegal

Arfang Diamanka*, Abdou Toure, Sikhou Drame, Cheikh Diop, Ngor Faye, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 118-128, August 2026.