Assessment of government assistance among small-scale fisherfolks

Paper Details

Research Paper 06/09/2022
Views (2353)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment of government assistance among small-scale fisherfolks

Horacio Factura, Francis Thaise A. Cimene, Ian Mark Q. Nacaya
Int. J. Biosci. 21(3), 36-42, September 2022.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2022; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Small-scale fishers are the poorest sector in the Philippines. Through the years, the City Government of Cagayan de Oro (CDO) has provided fisherfolks with different kinds of assistance. The government was interested to know how the inputs helped them. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted among fisherfolk associations in 3 barangays (districts). Results showed that they had received a number of livelihood support which have really helped them. However, there were some projects that failed due to technical reasons and poor financial management. Providing inputs is not enough to see positive long-term outcomes in terms of poverty alleviation, but a holistic approach is necessary to address all aspects of sustainability.

Badiola JAR, Guinto EJ, Das PK, Gietzen T, Yang L, Van Anrooy R. 2021. Financing small-scale fisheries in the Philippines – A policy brief. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb8029en

Béné C, Arthur R, Norbury RH, Allison EH, Bush BS, Campling L, Leschen E, Little D, Squires D, Thilsted SH, Troell M, Williams M. 2016. Contribution of Fisheries and Aquaculture to Food Security and Poverty Reduction: Assessing the Current Evidence. World Development 79 (2016), p 177-196,  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.007

Courtney CA, Jhaveri NJ, Pomeroy R, Brooks SH. 2016. Marine tenure and small-scale fisheries: Learning from the Philippines experience, Washington, DC: USAID Tenure and Global Climate Change Program.

Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR). 2010. Managing Municipal Fisheries in the Philippines: Context, Framework, Concepts and Principles. Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project, Cebu City, Philippines.

FAO. (Food and Agriculture Organization) Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication https://www.fao.org/voluntaryguidelines-small-scale-fisheries/guidelines/nutrition/en/

FAO. 2015. Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.

Lane DE, Stephenson RL. 1998. Fisheries Co-management: Organization, Process, and Decision Support. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, Volume 23, pages 251–265, 1998.

Muallil RN, Mamauag SS, Cababaro JT, Arceo HO, Aliño PM. 2014. Catch trends in Philippine small-scale fisheries over the last five decades: The fishers׳ perspectives, Marine Policy 47, 2014, Pages 110-117, ISSN 0308-597X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.008.

Partelow S. 2015. Key steps for operationalizing social–ecological system framework research in small-scale fisheries: A heuristic conceptual approach, Marine Policy 51, 507-511, ISSN 0308-597X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.005.

Perez ML, Pido MD, Garces LR, Salayo ND. 2012. Towards Sustainable Development of Small-Scale Fisheries in the Philippines: Experiences and Lessons Learned from Eight Regional Sites. WorldFish, Penang, Malaysia. Lessons Learned Brief 2012-10.

Pomeroy RS, Rivera-Guieb R. 2006. Fishery co-management: a practical handbook “International Development Research Centre. 2006, ISBN-10: 0-85199-088-6 ISBN-13: 978-0-85199-088-0

Sunderlin WD, Gorospe MLG. 1997. Fishers’ Organizations and Modes of Co-Management: The Case of San Miguel Bay, Philippines. Human Organization 56(3), (Fall 1997) p 333-343, Society for Applied Anthropology.

UNCTAD. 2017. Challenges and Opportunities for Small-Scale Fishers in Fish Trade. FAO-UNCTAD session at the WTO Public Forum 2017–Trade: Behind the Headlines United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 27 September 2017.

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.