Assessment of government assistance among small-scale fisherfolks

Paper Details

Research Paper 06/09/2022
Views (2372)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment of government assistance among small-scale fisherfolks

Horacio Factura, Francis Thaise A. Cimene, Ian Mark Q. Nacaya
Int. J. Biosci. 21(3), 36-42, September 2022.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2022; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Small-scale fishers are the poorest sector in the Philippines. Through the years, the City Government of Cagayan de Oro (CDO) has provided fisherfolks with different kinds of assistance. The government was interested to know how the inputs helped them. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted among fisherfolk associations in 3 barangays (districts). Results showed that they had received a number of livelihood support which have really helped them. However, there were some projects that failed due to technical reasons and poor financial management. Providing inputs is not enough to see positive long-term outcomes in terms of poverty alleviation, but a holistic approach is necessary to address all aspects of sustainability.

Badiola JAR, Guinto EJ, Das PK, Gietzen T, Yang L, Van Anrooy R. 2021. Financing small-scale fisheries in the Philippines – A policy brief. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb8029en

Béné C, Arthur R, Norbury RH, Allison EH, Bush BS, Campling L, Leschen E, Little D, Squires D, Thilsted SH, Troell M, Williams M. 2016. Contribution of Fisheries and Aquaculture to Food Security and Poverty Reduction: Assessing the Current Evidence. World Development 79 (2016), p 177-196,  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.007

Courtney CA, Jhaveri NJ, Pomeroy R, Brooks SH. 2016. Marine tenure and small-scale fisheries: Learning from the Philippines experience, Washington, DC: USAID Tenure and Global Climate Change Program.

Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR). 2010. Managing Municipal Fisheries in the Philippines: Context, Framework, Concepts and Principles. Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project, Cebu City, Philippines.

FAO. (Food and Agriculture Organization) Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication https://www.fao.org/voluntaryguidelines-small-scale-fisheries/guidelines/nutrition/en/

FAO. 2015. Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.

Lane DE, Stephenson RL. 1998. Fisheries Co-management: Organization, Process, and Decision Support. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, Volume 23, pages 251–265, 1998.

Muallil RN, Mamauag SS, Cababaro JT, Arceo HO, Aliño PM. 2014. Catch trends in Philippine small-scale fisheries over the last five decades: The fishers׳ perspectives, Marine Policy 47, 2014, Pages 110-117, ISSN 0308-597X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.008.

Partelow S. 2015. Key steps for operationalizing social–ecological system framework research in small-scale fisheries: A heuristic conceptual approach, Marine Policy 51, 507-511, ISSN 0308-597X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.005.

Perez ML, Pido MD, Garces LR, Salayo ND. 2012. Towards Sustainable Development of Small-Scale Fisheries in the Philippines: Experiences and Lessons Learned from Eight Regional Sites. WorldFish, Penang, Malaysia. Lessons Learned Brief 2012-10.

Pomeroy RS, Rivera-Guieb R. 2006. Fishery co-management: a practical handbook “International Development Research Centre. 2006, ISBN-10: 0-85199-088-6 ISBN-13: 978-0-85199-088-0

Sunderlin WD, Gorospe MLG. 1997. Fishers’ Organizations and Modes of Co-Management: The Case of San Miguel Bay, Philippines. Human Organization 56(3), (Fall 1997) p 333-343, Society for Applied Anthropology.

UNCTAD. 2017. Challenges and Opportunities for Small-Scale Fishers in Fish Trade. FAO-UNCTAD session at the WTO Public Forum 2017–Trade: Behind the Headlines United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 27 September 2017.

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.