Assessment of Physico-Chemical Parameters of Sugar industry effluents

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2017
Views (872)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment of Physico-Chemical Parameters of Sugar industry effluents

Muhammad Rayid, Zeeshan Ali, Anila Sikandar, Shaiza Bushra, Rafia Ali, Muhammad Zarak Khan, Mushtaq Ahmad, Sajid Aman
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 11(6), 101-113, December 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Sugar industries wastewater effluents are responsible for significant environmental and health problems in the absence of adequate pollution control measures. Nearly all stages of sugar production results in discharge of wastewater containing high levels of oil and suspended chemicals. In the present study, water effluents were collected from selected sugar mills in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) and the effluent samples were examined for different physico-chemical parameters viz. pH, total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), Electrical conductivity (EC), Turbidity, Free carbon dioxide, Carbonate, Bi-carbonate, Chlorides, Total hardness, Calcium carbonate, Calcium, Magnesium, Nitrite-nitrogen, Nitrate-nitrogen, Orthophosphate, and Sulfate. The analytical data revealed that the observed values of TSS, EC, TDS and pH were higher than Pakistan’s National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS) while other parameters turbidity, Calcium hardness, Nitrate-nitrogen, Nitrite-nitrogen, electrical conductivity, free carbon dioxide, and Sulfate concentration were found in range. The current study suggested that proper waste water monitoring and water arrangement system should be installed which not only ensure safety but also protect human health.

Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. 2010. Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(3), 919-937, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.00.6

Adekunle AS, Eniola IT. 2008. Impact of industrial effluents on quality of segment of Asariver within an industrial estate in Ilorin, Nigeria. New York Science Journal 1(1), 17-21.

Amathussalam A, MN. Abusbacker, Jayabal NJ 2002.Physico-chemical parameters and concentration of heavy metals in sugar industry. Indian Pollution Control 13, 118-119.

Azizullah A, Khattak MN, Richter P, Häder DP. 2011. Water pollution in Pakistan and its impact on public health- A review. Environment International 37(2), 479-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.007

Barman SC, Sahu SK, Bhargava, Chatterjee C. 2000.Distribution of heavy metals in wheat, mustard and grown in field irrigated with industrial effluent. Bulletin of Environmental and Contamination Toxicology, 64, 489-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001280000030

Basso LC, Basso TO, Rocha SN. 2011. Ethanol production in Brazil: the industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. In Biofuel production-recent developments and prospects. In Tech.

Chauhan MK, Chaudhary S, Kumar S. 2011. Life Cycle assessment of sugar industry: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 5(7), 3445-3453.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.03.3

Eggleston G, Lima I. 2015. Sustainability issues and opportunities in the sugar and sugar-bioproduct industries. Sustainability 7(9), 12209-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su70912209

ETPI. 2003. The sugar sector. Pakistan: Environmental report, Environmental Technology Program for Industry.

ETPI. 2001. Environmental Technology Program for Industry. “Environmental Report on Sugar Sector” Monthly Environmental News 5(7), 11-27.

Goel PK. 2006. Water pollution: causes, effects and control. New Age International.

Gunkel G, Kosmol J, Sobral M, Rohn H, Montenegro S, Aureliano J. 2007.Sugar cane industry as a source of water pollution-Case study on the situation in Ipojuca River, Pernambuco, Brazil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 180(1-4), 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9268-x

Gupta VK, Jain CK, Ali I, Chandra S, Agarwal S. 2002. Removal of lindane and malathion from wastewater using bagasse fly ash—a sugar industry waste. Water Research 36(10), 2483-2490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)004742

Gupta VK, Jain CK, Ali I, Sharma M, Saini VK. 2003. Removal of cadmium and nickel from wastewater using bagasse fly ash- A sugar industry waste. Water research 37(16), 4038-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00292-6

Kanu I, Achi OK. 2011. Industrial effluents and their impact on water quality of receiving rivers in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Technology in Environmental Sanitation 1(1), 75-86.

Kisku GC, Barman SC, Bhargava SK. 2000. Contamination of soil and plants potentially toxic elements irrigated with mixed industrial effluent and impact in the environment. Journal of Water, Air and Soil Pollution 120,  121-137. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005202304584

Macrelli S, Mogensen J, Zacchi G. 2012. Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process. Biotechnology for biofuels 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-22

Muthusamy PS, Murugan, Manothi Smitha. 2012. Removal of nickel ion from industrial waste water using maize cob. ISCA Journal of Biological Sciences 1(2), 7-11.

Pellegrini LF, de Oliveira Junior S. 2011. Combined production of sugar, ethanol and electricity: thermo economic and environmental analysis and optimization. Energy 36(6), 3704-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.011

Renó ML, delOlmo OA, Palacio JC, Lora EE, Venturini OJ. 2014. Sugarcane biorefineries: Case studies applied to the Brazilian sugar–alcohol industry. Energy Conversion and Management 86, 981-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.031

Saranraj P, Stella D. 2014. Impact of sugar mill effluent to environment and bioremediation: a review. World Applied Sciences Journal 30(3), 299-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.03.1656

Related Articles

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.

Bacteriological analysis of selected fishes sold in wet markets in Tuguegarao city, Cagayan, Philippines

Lara Melissa G. Luis, Jay Andrea Vea D. Israel, Dorina D. Sabatin, Gina M. Zamora, Julius T. Capili, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 1-9, August 2025.

Effect of different substrates on the domestication of Saba comorensis (Bojer) Pichon (Apocynaceae), a spontaneous plant used in agroforestry system

Claude Bernard Aké*1, Bi Irié Honoré Ta2, Adjo Annie Yvette Assalé1, Yao Sadaiou Sabas Barima1, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 90-96, July 2025.

Determinants of tree resource consumption around Mont Sangbé national park in western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Serge Cherry Piba, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Naomie Ouffoue, Alex Beda, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 71-81, July 2025.