Assessment of physicochemical properties of various sources of water and their impact on human health
Paper Details
Assessment of physicochemical properties of various sources of water and their impact on human health
Abstract
Concern over the potential negative health effects of drinking water components has led to a decrease in the use of tap and well water and an increase in the use of bottled water. The physical and chemical quality of various sources of water available in Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women, Chennai was compared. Some physicochemical parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), fluoride (F–), chloride (Cl–), nitrate (NO3), bicarbonate (HCO3), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sodium (Na) and magnesium (Mg) were measured for four samples labeled as reverse osmosis (RO) water, well water, tap water and bottled water. The results of the present study showed that the measured parameters except for bottled and RO water were of national and international standards. There was no significant difference between the qualities of well water when compared with tap water. Therefore, regardless of the place in which this study was conducted, there is no need to develop RO water system and bottled water for consumption because of their deleterious effects on human health. The well water and tap water in our college’s water supply network was of a suitable quality, ensuring that students’ health was not in danger. The findings of this study are like a wake-up call for the students, causing them to stop quenching their thirst with RO and bottled water.
Banerjee P, Prasad B. 2020. Determination of concentration of total sodium and potassium in surface and ground water using a flame photometer. Applied Water Science 10(5), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01188-1
Biswas AK, Tortajada C. 2019. Water crisis and water wars: Myths and realities. International Journal of Water Resources Development 35(5), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1636502
Bureau of Indian Standards. 2020. IS 10500: Drinking water—Specification (PM/10500/1). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
Carbonel JES, Gomez RA, Unlayao JC, de la Cruz J. 2019. Comparative study on the drinking water quality of tap water, bottled water, and water from water dispenser in Mapúa University, Philippines. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(24), 4976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16244976
Gaikwad S, Meshram D, Wagh V, Kandekar A, Kadam A. 2020. Geochemical mobility of ions in groundwater from the tropical western coast of Maharashtra, India: Implications to groundwater quality. Environmental Development and Sustainability 22(3), 2591–2624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00312-9
Ghanbarian M, Roudbari A, Nazemi S, Javid AB. 2022. A comparative study of various parameters of drinking water quality in Shahroud city, Iran: Tap water, well water, and bottled water. Water Policy 24(6), 867–877. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.201
Grout L, Chambers T, Hales S, Prickett M, Baker MG, Wilson N. 2023. The potential human health hazard of nitrates in drinking water: A media discourse analysis in a high-income country. Environmental Health 22(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-00960-5
IBM. n.d. IBM SPSS Statistics. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics
Lal B, Sengar SS, Singh R, Jhariya MK, Raj A. 2022. Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality assessment in Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10650-3
McGrane K. n.d. Tap water vs. bottled water: Which is better for your health? Healthline. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/tap-water-vs-bottled-water
Rapant S, Cvečková V, Fajčíková K, Sedláková D, Stehlíková B. 2017. Impact of calcium and magnesium in groundwater and drinking water on the health of inhabitants of the Slovak Republic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14(3), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030278
Rendal C, Kusk KO, Trapp S. 2011. Optimal choice of pH for toxicity and bioaccumulation studies of ionizing organic chemicals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30(10), 2395–2406. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.607
Shaji E, Sarath KV, Santosh M, Krishnaprasad PK, Arya BK, Babu MS. 2024. Fluoride contamination in groundwater: A global review of the status, processes, challenges, and remedial measures. Geoscience Frontiers 15(2), 101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101734
The Energy and Resources Institute. 2021. Water sustainability assessment of Chennai metropolitan area. New Delhi: The Energy and Resources Institute.
Uddin MR, Khandaker MU, Abedin MJ, Akter N, Jamal M, Sultana R, Sultana S, Hasan M, Osman H, Elesawy BH, Sayyed MI, Sulieman A. 2021. Quality assessment of bottled and unbottled drinking water in Bangladesh. Water 13(15), 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152026
World Health Organization. 2011. Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
Wu X, Li C, Sun B, Geng F, Gao S, Lv M, Ma X, Li H, Xing L. 2020. Groundwater hydrogeochemical formation and evolution in a karst aquifer system affected by anthropogenic impacts. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 42(9), 2609–2626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00450-z
S. Rizwana Begum, T. A. K Mumtaz Begum, Mrs. Nousheen Irfana, 2025. Assessment of physicochemical properties of various sources of water and their impact on human health. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci., 27(5), 25-34.
Copyright © 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.