Assessment the results of QSPM in opportunities strength for electronically waste of environmental management by SWOT method in Pira Iranian drilling company

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2015
Views (893)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment the results of QSPM in opportunities strength for electronically waste of environmental management by SWOT method in Pira Iranian drilling company

Ali Kazemi, Leila Ebrahimi Ghavam Abadi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(4), 524-532, April 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Electronic and electrical equipment production growth and development along with their short life has led to production of enormous amount of electronic and electrical waste. The aim of the current research is to evaluate the results of QSPM matrix using SWOT analysis in aggressive strategy to environmentally manage electronic waste of Pira Iranian Drilling Company. Statistical population to answer the questionnaire included all employees (90 people) in staff department. Sample size was determined 73 people through Cochran formula while the random sampling was conducted. The results revealed that the company with the score of 2.35 has weak internal position regarding electronic and electric waste management whereas its score of 2.55 indicates its strong external position. Ultimately, primary strategies were prioritized in 3 categories the most important of which were determined as interacting with relevant organizations in order to repair and donate defective electronic and electrical equipment as well as separating them prior to the final disposal with the score of 8.8 plus using instructions in order to optimize not only collecting but also conserving electronic waste with the score of 8.11.

Ching-Hwa L, Chang-Tang Ch, Kuo-Shuh F, Tien-Chin Ch. 2004. An overview of recycling and treatment of scrap computers. Journal of Hazardous Materials B114, 93-100.

Khetriwal DS, Kraeuchi P, Widmer R. 2009. Producer responsibility for e-waste management: key issues for consideration – Learning from the Swiss experience. Journal of Environmental Management 90(1), 153-156.

Kiddee P, Maidu R, Wong MH. 2013. Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Management 33(2), 1237-1250.

Neyland D. 2008. Electronic waste: ResIST case study report. James Martin Institute ResIST Working Paper 10 April.

Posada E. 2010. Strategic analysis of alternatives for waste management. Waste Manaement. INTECH Croatia 232.

Srivastava PK, Kulshreshtha K, Mohanty CS, Pushpangadan P, Singh A. 2005. Stakeholder-based SWOT analysis for successful municipal solid waste management in Lucknow, India. Waste Management 25(1), 531-537.

Torretta V, Ragazzi M, Istrate IA, Rada EC. 2013. Management of waste electrical and electronic equipment in two eu countries: a comparison. Waste Management 33(3), 117-122.

Yang J, Lu B, Xu Ch. 2008. WEEE flow and mitigating measures in China. Waste Management 28(2), 1589-1597.

Yla-Mella J, Poikela K, Lehtinen U, Keiski RL, Pongracz E. 2014. Implementation of waste electrical and electronic equipment directive in Finland: evaluation of the collection network and challenges of the effective WEEE management. Resources. Conservation and Recycling 86(2), 38-46.

Yuan H. 2013. A SWOT analysis of successful construction waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production 39(1), 1-8.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.