Bio-physical and chemical assessment of Mangrove waters in Gonzaga, Cagayan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2020
Views (790)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Bio-physical and chemical assessment of Mangrove waters in Gonzaga, Cagayan

Froilan A. Pacris Jr, Gerlie U. Bayani, Marvin V. Baloloy
Int. J. Biosci. 16(6), 241-248, June 2020.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2020; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The present study was carried out to determine the seasonal variations on the biological, physical and chemical characteristics of mangrove waters in Gonzaga, Cagayan, Philippines specifically in Barangays Caroan, San Jose and Tapel based on six water quality parameters such as pH, alkalinity, nitrite, ammonia, salinity and temperature. Five sampling stations were monitored along the mangrove ecosystems once a month for twelve months from June 2018 to May 2019. Results showed that mean values of different water quality parameters were as follows: pH (7.65 to 7.79), alkalinity (92mg/L to 118mg/L), nitrite (0.04 to 0.05mg/L), ammonia (0.04-0.18mg/L), salinity (31 ppt to 34 ppt) and water temperature (28°C-29°C). Significant seasonal variations (P<0.05) were observed in nitrite and temperature values. while no seasonal variations (P>0.05) were observed in pH, alkalinity, ammonia and salinity values. Meanwhile, the recorded values of water parameters are within the ideal range appropriate for marine environment specifically mangrove species which are presence in the sampling stations. Based on the data gathered, there were significant seasonal variations in biological, physical and chemical characteristics specifically on nitrite level and temperature of mangrove waters in all five sampling stations. All parameters obtained low values during wet season, while high values during dry season in all stations. Therefore, the present study revealed that season (wet and dry season) is the main factor in the variations of biological, physical and chemical characteristics of mangrove waters in Barangays Caroan, San Jose and Tapel of Gonzaga, Cagayan. Implications of the study will serve reference for the conservation, management and sustainable development of the mangrove ecosystem, it is necessary to perform annual monitoring of biological, physical and chemical characteristics of mangrove waters should be done.

Antonopoulos VZ, Papamichail DM, Mitsiou KA. 2001. Statistical and trend analysis of water quality and quantity data for the Strymon River in Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 5(4), 679-692.

Cuenca GC, Macusi ED, Abreo NAS, Ranara CTB, Andam MB, Cardona LT, Guanzon GC. 2015. Mangrove ecosystems and associated fauna with special reference to mangrove crabs in the Philippines: A Review. IAMURE International Journal of Ecology and Conservation 15(1), 1-1.

Giesen W, Wulffraat S, Zieren M, Scholten L. 200. Mangrove guidebook for Southeast Asia. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved on January 15, 2015 from http://goo.gl/t2YJzr

Jayatissa LP, Wickramasinghe WAADL, Dahdouh‐Guebas F, Huxham M. 2008. Interspecific variations in responses of mangrove seedlings to two contrasting salinities. International review of hydrobiology  93(6), 700-710.

Kumar LA, Thangaradjou T, Kannan L. 2006. Physico-chemical and biological properties of the Muthupettai Mangrove in, Tamil Nadu. J. Mar. Biol. Ass, 131-138.

Lee SY, Primavera JH, Guebas FD, McKee K, Bosire JO, Cannicci S. Mendelssohn I.. 2014. Ecological role and services of tropical mangrove ecosystems: a reassessment. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23(7), 726-743.

Lewis R.R. 2009. Methods and criteria for successful mangrove forest restoration. Coastal Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier 787-800.

Lewis RR, Brown B. 2014. Ecological mangrove rehabilitation–a field manual for practitioners. Mangrove Action Project, Canadian International Development Agency, and OXFAM.

Manju MN, Resmi P, Gireesh Kumar TR, Kumar R, Rahul R, Joseph MM, Chandramohanakumar N. 2012. Assessment of water quality parameters in mangrove ecosystems along Kerala coast: a statistical approach. International journal of environmental research 6(4), 893-902.

Mariappan, V. N., Nivas, A. H., Kanmani, T., & Parthiban, S. 2015. A Study of Water Quality Status of Mangrove Vegetation in Pichavaram Estuary.

Morrisey DJ, Swales A, Dittmann S, Morrison MA, Lovelock CE, Beard CM. 2010. The ecology and management of temperate mangroves (Vol. 48, pp. 43-160). R. N. Gibson (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton (USA). Retrieved on April 4, 2015 from http://goo.gl/NOIfgl

Primavera J.H. 2000. Development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: institutional issues. Ecological Economics 35(1), 91-106.

Primavera JH, Esteban JMA. 2008. A review of mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines: successes, failures and future prospects. Wetlands Ecology and Management 16(5), 345-358.

Primavera JH, Savaris JP, Bajoyo BE, Coching JD, Curnick DJ, Golbeque RL, Koldewey HJ. 2012. Manual for community-based mangrove rehabilitation. London, Zoological Society of London, Mangrove Manual Series, (1), 240. Retrieved on April 28, 2015 from http://goo.gl/ b6dQxt.

Quarto, A. 2012. Ecological mangrove restoration: re-establishing a more biodiverse and resilient coastal ecosystem with community participation. Sharing Lessons on Mangrove Restoration, 277.

Smith KA, Ball T, Conen F, Dobbie K, Massheder J, Rey A. 2003. Exchange of greenhou se gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. European Journal of Soil Science 54, 779-91.

Van Lavieren H, Spalding M, Alongi D, Kainuma M, Godt MC, Adeel Z. 2012. Securing the Future of Mangroves, A Policy Brief. UNU-INWEH, UNESCO-MAB with ISME, ITTO, FAO, UNEP-WCMC and TNC, 1-53.

Zakaria M, Rajpar M. 2015. Assessing the fauna diversity of Marudu Bay mangrove forest, Sabah, Malaysia, for future conservation. Diversity 7(2), 137-148.

Related Articles

Sensory acceptability of gnocchi pasta added with different levels of malunggay (Moringa oleifera) leaves and blue ternate (Clitoria ternatea) flowers

Ralph Justyne B. Bague, James Troyo, Proceso C. Valleser Jr.*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 103-114, January 2026.

Spatio-temporal analysis of vegetation cover and socio-environmental implications in Korhogo (Northern Côte d’Ivoire) from 1990-2020

Adechina Olayossimi*, Konan Kouassi Urbain, Ouattara Amidou, Yao-Kouamé Albert, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 94-102, January 2026.

Predicting the habitat suitability of Vitellaria paradoxa under climate change scenarios

Franck Placide Junior Pagny*, Anthelme Gnagbo, Dofoungo Kone, Blaise Kabré, Marie-Solange Tiébré6,, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 73-83, January 2026.

Performance response dynamics of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) to locally sourced, on-farm feed ingredients during the growing phase: Implications for the institutional rabbit multiplier project

Roel T. Calagui*, Janelle G. Cadiguin, Maricel F. Campańano, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Louis Voltaire A. Pagalilauan, Mary Ann M. Santos, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 65-72, January 2026.

Chronopharmacology: Integration of circadian biology in modern pharmacotherapy

Sangram D. Chikane*, Vishal S. Adak, Shrikant R. Borate, Rajkumar V. Shete, Deepak V. Fajage, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 56-64, January 2026.

Evaluation of the impact of floristic diversity on the productivity of cocoa-based agroforestry systems in the new cocoa production area: The case of the Biankouma department (Western Côte d’Ivoire)

N'gouran Kobenan Pierre, Zanh Golou Gizele*, Kouadio Kayeli Anaïs Laurence, Kouakou Akoua Tamia Madeleine, N'gou Kessi Abel, Barima Yao Sadaiou Sabas, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 44-55, January 2026.

Utilization of locally sourced feed ingredients and their influence on the growth performance of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): A study in support of the school’s chicken multiplier project

Roel T. Calagui*, Maricel F. Campańano, Joe Hmer Kyle T. Acorda, Louis Voltaire A. Pagalilauan, Mary Ann M. Santos, Jojo D. Cauilan, John Michael U. Tabil, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 35-43, January 2026.