Biodiversity associated with mussel fishery at Vizhinjam-Arabian sea, South Kerala
Paper Details
Biodiversity associated with mussel fishery at Vizhinjam-Arabian sea, South Kerala
Abstract
The manuscript implies the assessment of species diversity associated with the mussel fishery at Vizhinjam. The objective of the present study is to formulate a data regarding with mussel fishery associated diversity which is usually considered as by catch discard after sorting out the commercially important species like Brown mussel (Perna perna) and Green mussel (Perna viridis). It can be used for the assessment of diversity loss in relation with the fishery and also helpful to the prediction the impact of the fishery activity in the area. The study was carried out in Vizhinjam, during form 2011 June to 2012 May. Our result includes the total species diversity of mussel fishery discards for a period of one year. The correlation analysis reveals the inter relationships between the plants and animals of the mussel bed and the time series analysis can give a view on species diversity variations in each month. The space between the mussels in the natural mussel bed offers refuges for wide varieties biotic communities, including marine plants, small shore crabs and anemones. Mussel bed ecosystems in Vizhinjam support a variety of marine plants, invertebrates and fishes. Precautions must be taken for reducing the unwanted lose of species diversity while harvesting.
Appukuttan KK, Nair TP. 1980. Fishery and biology of the brown mussel Perna indica Kuriakose and Nair. Mussel Farming: Progress and Prospects. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Bulletin 19, 5-9.
Arribas LP, Donnarumma ML, Palomo G, Scrosati RA. 2014. Intertidal mussels as ecosystem engineers: their associated invertebrate biodiversity under contrasting wave exposures. Marine Biodiversity 44, 203–211.
Badalamenti F, Chemello R, Anna DG, Ramoz HP, Riggio S. 2002. Are artificial mussel beds comparable to neighbouring natural rocky areas? A mollusc case study in the Gulf of Castellammare. Journal of Marine Science 59, S127–S131.
Beck MW. 1998. Comparison of the measurement and effects of habitat structure on gastropods in rocky intertidal and mangrove habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 169, 165–178.
Beck MW. 2000. Separating the elements of habitat structure: independent effects of habitat complexity and structural components on rocky intertidal gastropods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 249, 29–49.
Birkeland C. 1997a. Life and Death of Coral mussel beds. Chapman and Hall, New York p. 536.
Branch G, Branch M. 1993. In: The Living Shores of Southern Africa (6th Edition ed.), Struik publishers, Cape Town.
Bryant D, Burke L, Mc Manus J, Spalding M. 1998. Mussel beds at Risk: a map based indicator of threats to the world’s coral mussel beds. World Resources Institute. 56 p.
Carr MH, Hixon MA. 1997. Artificial mussel beds: the importance of comparisons with natural mussel beds. Fisheries 22, 28–33.
Childress JJ, Fisher CR, Favuzzi JA, Sanders NK. 1991. Sulfide and carbon dioxide uptake by the hydrothermal vent clam Calyptogena magnifica and its chemoautotrophic symbionts. Physiological Zoology 64, 1444–1470.
Cohen JE, Small C, Mellinger A, Gallup J, Sachs J. 1997. Estimates of coastal populations. Science 278, 1209.
Connor NE, Crowe TP, McGrath D. 2006. Effects of epibiotic algae on the survival, biomass and recruitment of mussels, Mytilus L. (Bivalvia: Mollusca). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 328, 265-276.
Craik W, Kenchington R, Kelleher G. 1990. Coral-Mussel bed Management. In: Dubinsky, Z. (Ed.), Ecosystems of the World 25: Coral Mussel beds. Elsevier, New York pp. 453–467.
Crowe TP, Smith EL, Donkin P, Barnaby DL, Rowland SJ. 2004. Measurements of sub lethal effects on individual organisms indicate community-level impacts of pollution. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 114–123.
Davenport J, Butler A, Chesire A. 1999. Epifaunal composition and fractal dimensions of marine plants in relation to emersion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 351–355.
Davies RWD, Cripps SJ, Nickson A, Porter G. 2009. Marine Pollution Bulletin 33, 661-672.
Dittman S. 1990. Mussel beds-amensalism or amelioration for intertidal fauna? Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 44, 335–352.
Dulvy NK, Stanwell-Smith D, Darwall WRT, Horrill CJ. 1995. Coral mining at Mafia Island, Tanzania: a management dilemma. Ambio 24(6), 358–365.
Field JG, Griffiths CL. 1991. Littoral and sublittoral ecosystems of southern Africa. In: Mathieson AC. and Nienhuis PH. 1991. Ecosystems of the World 24. Intertidal and Littoral Ecosystems, Elsevier, Amsterdam pp. 323–346.
Gray AW. 1997. The relationship between herbivorous mollusca and algae on moderately exposed Hong Kong shores, Journal of Marine Biology. South China 5, 56.
Gutierrez JL, Jones CG, Strayer DL, Iribarne O. 2003. Mollusks as ecosystems engineers: the role of the shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 101, 79-90.
Harris JM, Branch GM, Elliot BL, Currie B, Dye AH, Mcquaid CD, Tomalin BJ, Velasquez C. 1998. Spatial and temporal variability in recruitment of intertidal mussels around the coast of southern Africa. South African Journal of Zoology 33 1, pp. 1–11.
Herman PMJ. 1993. A set of models to investigate the role of benthic suspension feeder sinestuarine ecosystems. In: Dame RF (ed.) Bivalve Filter Feeders in Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Processes, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg pp. 421–454.
Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA. 2005. EVects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75, 3–35.
Ingólfsson A, Agnarsson I. 2003. Amphipods and isopods in the rocky intertidal: dispersal and movements during high tide. Marine Biology 143, 859–866.
Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69, 373-386.
Kelleher K. 2005. Discards in the world’s marine fisheries. An update. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 470. Rome, FAO. 131p.
Kennelly SJ, Broadhrust MK. 2002. By‐catch begone: changes in the philosophy of fishing technology, Fish and Fisheries 3, 340-355.
Kostylev V. 1996. Spatial heterogeneity and habita complexity affecting marine litoral fauna. PhD thesis, Goteborg University, Sweden.
Lintas C, Seed R. 1994. Spatial variation in the fauna associated with Mytilus edulis on a wave exposed rocky shore, Journal Molluscan Studies 60(2), 165-174.
Meysman FJR, Middelburg JJ, Heip CHR. 2006. Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin’s last idea. Trends Ecological Evolution 21, 688–695.
Perkol-Finkel S, Shashar N, Barnea O, Ben-Daviv-Zaslaw R, Oren U, Reichart T. 2005. Fouling mussel bed al communities on artificial mussel beds: does age matter? Biofouling 21, 127–140.
Ravinesh R, Bijukumar A. 2013. Comparison of intertidal biodiversity associated with natural rocky shore and sea wall: A case study from the Kerala coast, India. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences 42(2), 223-235.
Saier B. 2002. Subtidal and intertidal mussel beds (Mytilus edulis L.) in the Wadden Sea: diversity differences of associated epifauna. Helgoland Marine Research 56, 44–50.
Saritha K, Mary D, Patterson J. 2015. Nutritional Status of Green Mussel Perna viridis at Tamil Nadu, Southwest Coast of India. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences S14, pp 2-4.
Sebens KP. 1991. Habitat structure and community dynamics in marine benthic systems. In: Bell SS, Mc Coy ED, Mushinky HR. (Eds.), Habitat structure: The Physical Arrangements of objects in Space. Chapman and Hall, London pp. 221-234.
Seed R, Suchanek TH. 1992. Population and community ecology of Mytilus. In: Gosling, E. (Ed.), The Mussel Mytilus: Ecology, Physiology, Genetics and Culture. Elsevier, London pp. 87-169.
Seed R. 1996. Patterns of biodiversity in the macro- invertebrate fauna associated with mussel patches on rocky shores. Journal of Marine biological Association of U. K 76, 203-210.
Stephenson TA, Stephenson A. 1972. In: Life Between Tide-marks On Rocky Shores, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Suchanek TH. 1979. The Mytilus californianus community: studies on the composition, structure, organization, and dynamics of a mussel bed. Dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Suchanek TH. 1985. Mussel and their role in structuring rocky shore communities. In: Moore, PG, Seed R. (Eds.), The Ecology of Rocky Coasts. Columbia University Press, New York pp. 70-96.
Tsuchiya M. 2002. Faunal structures associated with patches of mussels on East Asian coasts. Helgoland Marine Research 56, 31-36.
Vakily JM. 1992. Determination and comparison of bivalve growth with emphasis on Thailand and other tropical areas, ICLARM Technical report 36, pp. 125.
Van Erkom Schurink C, Griffiths CL. 1990. Marine mussels of southern Africa their distribution patterns, standing stocks, exploitation and culture. Journal of Shellfish Research. 91, pp. 75–85.
PT Baiju, FG Benno Pereira, V Jayaprakas, MP Prabhakaran (2016), Biodiversity associated with mussel fishery at Vizhinjam-Arabian sea, South Kerala; JBES, V9, N3, September, P73-89
https://innspub.net/biodiversity-associated-with-mussel-fishery-at-vizhinjam-arabian-sea-south-kerala/
Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0