Carbon footprint assessment of rice cultivation of select rice farmers in Isabela, Philippines: A case study
Paper Details
Carbon footprint assessment of rice cultivation of select rice farmers in Isabela, Philippines: A case study
Abstract
Rice cultivation is the major source of GHG emission in the agriculture sector. Absence or insufficient actions to mitigate climate change can further impact the rice sector. Hence, there is a need to estimate carbon footprint in the major rice-farm activities. The main objective of this study was to assess the carbon footprint ha-1 generated by rice farmers. Case study and life-cycle assessment in rice production were employed. Data were gathered from household surveys and analyzed through descriptive statistics such as mean and ANOVA. Analysis revealed that the carbon footprint ha-1 generated by rice farmers during the dry season was 5,017.80 kg CO2e ha-1. The top three major sources of GHG emission in rice cultivation were soil emission, from rice cultivation, fertilizer, and fuel with 3,952.79 kg CO2e ha-1, 944.83 kg CO2e ha-1, and 52.83 kg CO2e ha-1, respectively. The different factors that showed significant difference in carbon footprint ha-1 generated by rice farmers were: quantity of fertilizer, quantity of insecticide, frequency of insecticide application, and cropping system. It has been demonstrated that GHG accounting provided metrics in carbon footprint and evidence for authorities to determine plans and initiatives, and to employ necessary interventions and mitigations to contribute in curtailing GHG emission and to minimize the impacts of climate change in the rice production sector. The findings suggest that the government can initiate localized plans and programs such as climate change education and skills training. Through this, rice farmers can strengthen their productivity and technical efficiency, and foster environmental efficiency.
Akter H, Ali MdR, Alam MdS, Sarker TR, Ahamed S, Saha CK. 2024. Estimation of economic life and feasibility of combine harvesters in Bangladesh deploying a unique web-based app. Smart Agricultural Technology 7, 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100378
Allen J, Pascual KS, Romansanta RR, Trinh MV, Thach TV, Hung NV, Sander BO, Chivenge P. 2020. Rice straw management effects on greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options. In: Gummert M, Hung N, Chivenge P, Douthwaite B (eds). Sustainable Rice Straw. Springer, Cham, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32373-8_9
Banks JL, McConnell R. 2015. National emissions from lawn and garden equipment. US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/banks.pdf. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
Bautista EG, Saito M. 2016. Greenhouse gas emissions from rice production in the Philippines based on life-cycle inventory analysis. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 13(1), 139–144. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273636139_Greenhouse_gas_emissions_from_rice_production_in_the_Philippines_based_on_life-cycle_inventory_analysis
Climate Transparency. 2021. Philippines, country profile 2020. https://www.climate-transparency.org/media/philippines-country-profile-2020. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
Domínguez-Escribá L, Porcar M. 2010. Rice straw management: The big waste. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 4(2), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.196
El-Gafy IK, El-Bably WF. 2016. Assessing greenhouse gasses emitted from on-farm irrigation pumps: Case studies from Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 7(3), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.07.001
Fakana ST. 2020. Causes of climate change: Review article. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342452772_Causes_of_Climate_Change_Review_Article. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
Hokazono S, Hayashi K. 2012. Variability in environmental impacts during conversion from conventional to organic farming: A comparison among three rice production systems in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production 28, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.005
Hou X, Tian J, Song C, Wang J, Zhao J, Zhang X. 2019. Emission inventory research of typical agricultural machinery in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment 216, 116903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116903
IPCC. 2019. 2019 refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/index.html. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
IRRI. 2016. Can PH rice compete globally? What can PH do? Philippine Rice Research Institute. https://www.philrice.gov.ph/download/can-ph-rice-compete-globally-what-can-ph-do/. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
Launio CC, Asis CA, Manalili RG, Javier EF, Belizario AF. 2014. What factors influence choice of waste management practice? Evidence from rice straw management in the Philippines. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy 32(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242×13518090
Launio CC, Redondo GO, Tabalno RF, Bordey FH. 2015. Is the Philippines’ leading rice-producing province faring good enough? The case of rice farming in Nueva Ecija. Philippine Rice Research Institute. https://tuklas.up.edu.ph/Record/UP-99796217612880451/Details
Lips M. 2017. Length of operational life and its impact on life-cycle costs of a tractor in Switzerland. Agriculture 7(8), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7080068
Maneepitak S, Ullah H, Paothong K, Kachenchart B, Datta A, Shrestha RP. 2019. Effect of water and rice straw management practices on yield and water productivity of irrigated lowland rice in the central plain of Thailand. Agricultural Water Management 211, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.041
Mendoza T. 2015. Enhancing crop residues recycling in the Philippine landscape. In: Muthu SS (ed). Environmental Implications of Recycling and Recycled Products. Springer, 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-643-0_4
Moya P, Kajisa K, Barker R, Mohanty S, Gascon F, Valentine MR, Montesano MJ. 2017. Changes in rice farming in the Philippines: Insights from five decades of a household-level survey. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 32(1), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj32-1k
Philippine Statistics Authority. 2021. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/Palay%20Production%20in%20the%20Philippines%2C%202018-2020.pdf. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
PhilRice. 2022. https://www.philrice.gov.ph/ricelytics/profilemain. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
Sampaothong S, Punyawattoe P. 2024. Comparison of carbon footprint, environment impact, efficacy and benefit–cost ratio of insecticide resistance management with conventional methods used by Thai Chinese cabbage farmers. The Open Agriculture Journal 18(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743315286838240116042733
Singh G, Gupta MK, Chaurasiya S, Sharma VS, Pimenov DY. 2021. Rice straw burning: A review on its global prevalence and the sustainable alternatives for its effective mitigation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(25), 32125–32155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14163-3
Stuecker MF, Tigchelaar M, Kantar MB. 2018. Climate variability impacts on rice production in the Philippines. PLOS ONE 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201426
Thanawong K, Perret SR, Basset-Mens C. 2014. Eco-efficiency of paddy rice production in northeastern Thailand: A comparison of rain-fed and irrigated cropping systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 73, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.067
United Nations. 2024. The climate crisis – a race we can win. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/un75/climate-crisis-race-we-can-win. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
US EPA. 2020. Global greenhouse gas emissions data. EPA. https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data_.html. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
Yanmar Philippines. https://www.yanmar.com/ph/. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
Yang SS, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhou HM, Ji XY, He L, Xing DF, Ren NQ, Ho SH, Wu WM. 2019. A novel clean production approach to utilize crop waste residues as co-diet for mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) biomass production with biochar as byproduct for heavy metal removal. Environmental Pollution 252, 1142–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.028
Jeffrey C. Ginez, Marcelino U. Siladan (2025), Carbon footprint assessment of rice cultivation of select rice farmers in Isabela, Philippines: A case study; IJAAR, V26, N5, May, P42-54
https://innspub.net/carbon-footprint-assessment-of-rice-cultivation-of-select-rice-farmers-in-isabela-philippines-a-case-study/
Copyright © 2025
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0