Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Paper Details

Research Paper 07/06/2026
Views (366)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study evaluated the carbon sequestration potential of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement under a combined inorganic–organic fertilization system. The experiment was conducted at the RDE Complex, College of Agriculture, Central Mindanao University from June to August 2025 using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with five treatments: control (recommended rate of inorganic fertilizer), and combinations of inorganic fertilizer with goat manure, chicken manure, cattle manure, and swine manure. Results revealed highly significant differences (p< 0.01) among treatments in soil organic matter, soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS), and carbon sequestration of napier grass. Among treatments, cattle manure (T4) consistently showed the highest performance, recording the greatest organic matter content (4.01%), favorable soil pH (6.03), highest SOC (2.33%), highest SOC stocks (32.15 Mg/ha), and highest carbon sequestration potential (4.72 Mg/ha). Swine manure (T5) produced the highest bulk density (1.29 g/cm³), while the control treatment showed the lowest carbon storage values across parameters. Overall, organic amendments significantly improved soil carbon dynamics compared to the control, demonstrating the strong potential of integrated nutrient management in enhancing carbon storage in napier grass systems. The findings indicate that cattle manure is the most effective amendment for maximizing soil carbon sequestration and improving soil quality, thereby contributing to climate change mitigation and sustainable forage production systems.

Agbede TM. 2025. Poultry manure improves soil properties and grain mineral composition, maize productivity and economic profitability. Scientific Reports 15(1), 16501.

Biazin B, Kim D, Mengistu T. 2018. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks following land use changes in a sub-humid climate. Environment and Natural Resources Research 8(1), 70.

Borisoot K, Suriharn K, Maneewan S, Punlek C, Suksri A, Wongwuttanasatian T. 2025. Maximizing yield with a novel Napier grass breed for tropical regions: A case study of Thailand. Environmental Technology & Innovation 40, 104551.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2017. The State of Food and Agriculture 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Fosu-Mensah BY, Mutaru D, MacCarthy DS, Mensah M. 2025. Assessing the effect of organic and inorganic resources on carbon fractions in soggy sodic soil at Sege in Ada West District, Ghana. Soil Systems 9(2), 62.

Hermy NN, Reeza AA. 2025. Effect of composted animal manure on growth and development of Napier Pakchong (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum glaucum). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1535(1), 012001.

Huang X, Jia Z, Jiao X, Wang J, Huang X. 2022. Long-term manure applications increase carbon sequestration and macroaggregate-stabilized carbon. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 174, 108827.

Khan MT, Aleinikovienė J, Butkevičienė L. 2024. Innovative organic fertilizers and cover crops: Perspectives for sustainable agriculture in the era of climate change and organic agriculture. Agronomy 14(12), 2871.

Piccolo A. 2012. Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Innovative Methods. Springer Science & Business Media.

Tamta S, Kumar A, Kushwaha DP. 2023. Potential of roots and shoots of Napier grass for arresting soil erosion and runoff in Mollisol soils of the Himalayas. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 11(3), 538–548.

Yousuf A, Sannino F, Pirozzi D. 2019. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Liquid Biofuels. Academic Press.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.