home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Chick embryo tongue development: A histological study

Paper Details

Research Paper 09/11/2024
Views (32) Download (7)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Chick embryo tongue development: A histological study

Amnah Al-Beladi, Fatma Al-Qudsi
Int. J. Biosci.25( 5), 155-166, November 2024.
Certificate: IJB 2024 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Chick embryoDifferentiationMesenchymal cellTongue development

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the developing histological structure of the chick embryo tongue at 10,15 and 19 embryonic days (ED), to understand tongue tissue differentiation and histogenesis during development. Fertilized chicken eggs were incubated under identical standard conditions. The tongue was extracted on the specified embryonic days. The tongue sample gross morphology was examined, then samples were fixed, and tissue sections were made using hematoxylin and eosin staining. The results of this study showed that: the tongue of ED10 contained the beginning of the lingual tissue’s differentiation (Muscle tissue, cartilage tissue and epithelial tissue). The conical papillae appeared as a bud in ED10. The tongue tissues of ED15 and ED19 were more differentiated compared to ED10. The lingual gland appeared in ED10 and progressed in ED15 and ED19, and the length of the conical papillae increased with age. Mesenchymal cells appeared in ED10, these cells seemed to decrease in number and become differentiated at the proximal part of the tongue.  Conclusion: The differentiation of the chick embryo tongue took place from the root to the apex. The tongue of chicken embryos seemed characterized by very different tissues. The tongue elongation rate was at its highest level between 15 and 19 days of incubation.

VIEWS 16
Cover PDF

Augello A, De Bari C. 2010. The regulation of differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells. Human gene therapy 21(10), 1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2010.173.

Bandiera A, Lorenzon P, D’Andrea P. 2014. Biomimetic polypeptides: a new strategy for muscle tissue regeneration. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/10281.

Bryk SG, Orlandini SZ, Gheri G, Sgambati E. 1992. Development of the chick tongue. A scanning electron microscopical investigation. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 174(6), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(11)80317-1.

Ertaş TD, Erdoğan S. 2019. Investigation of chicken (Gallus domesticus) tongue by morphometric and scanning electron microscopic methods. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 12(1), 8–12.

Gilbert SF. 2010. Developmental biology. 9th Edition, Sinauer Associates, Sunderlan.

Glimm T, Bhat R, Newman SA. 2020. Multiscale modeling of vertebrate limb development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine 12(4), e1485. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/750162.

Han D, Zhao H, Parada C, Hacia JG, Bringas Jr P, Chai Y. 2012. A TGFβ-Smad4-Fgf6 signaling cascade controls myogenic differentiation and myoblast fusion during tongue development. Development 139(9), 1640–1650. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.076653.

Humphreys PA, Mancini FE, Ferreira MJ, Woods S, Ogene L, Kimber SJ. 2022. Developmental principles informing human pluripotent stem cell differentiation to cartilage and bone. In Seminars in cell & developmental biology 127, 17–36. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.11.024.

Igbokwe CO, Mbajiorgu FE, Bello UM. 2024. Anatomical and Surface Electron Microscopic Investigation of the Tongue and Laryngeal Prominence in the Red-Eyed Turtle Dove (Streptopelia semitorquata, Rüppel 1837). Microscopy and Microanalysis ozae045. https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozae045.

Iwasaki SI, Kobayashi K. 1986. On the Lingual Dorsal Epithelium of Chickens. Acta Anat. Nippon 61(2), 83–96. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052120103.

Jaskoll T, Melnick M. 2005. Embryonic salivary gland branching morphogenesis. In: Branching Morphogenesis. Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30873-3_9.

Kadhim KK, Zuki ABZ, Babjee SMA, Noordin MM, Zamri-Saad M. 2011. Morphological and histochemical observations of the red jungle fowl tongue Gallus gallus. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(48), 9969–9977. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.955.

Khaleel IM, Zghair FS, Atyia MAK. 2023. Morphohistological and histochemical study of oropharynx and tongue of duck (Anas platyrhynchos), partridge (Alectoris chukar) and ostrich (Struthio camelus) birds. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology 10(Special Issue 1), 267–279. Retrieved from http://ijichthyol.org/index.php/iji/article/view/980.

Khalifa MO, Abd‐elkareem M, Gaber W, Li T, Saleh AM. 2021. Developmental morphological analyses on the preglottal salivary gland in Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23892.

Lillie FR, Hamilton HL, Willier BH. 1952. Lillie’s development of the chick: an introduction to embryology.

Lugert V, Thaller G, Tetens J, Schulz C, Krieter J. 2016. A review on fish growth calculation: multiple functions in fish production and their specific application. Reviews in Aquaculture 8(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12071.

Ribatti D, Annese T. 2023. Chick embryo in experimental embryology and more. Pathology-Research and Practice 245, 154478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2023.154478.

Sabry DA. 2015. Comparative studies on tongue of Egretta ibis and Gallus gallus. Research Opinions in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 5(9), 375–382. URL: http://www.roavs.com/pdf-files/Issue-9-2015/375-382.pdf.

Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9(7), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019.

Skieresz-Szewczyk K, Jackowiak H, Ratajczak M. 2018. Ultrastructural study on the embryonic development of the orthokeratinized epithelium and its cornified layer (lingual nail) on the ventral surface of the lingual apex in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos f. domestica). Zoology 126, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2017.12.005.

Skieresz-Szewczyk K, Jackowiak H, Ratajczak M. 2021. Unique pattern of histogenesis of the parakeratinized epithelium on lingual prominence in the domestic goose embryos (Anser anser f. domestica). Scientific Reports 11(1), 22754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02020-9.

Skieresz-Szewczyk K, Jackowiak H. 2017. Development of mechanical papillae of the tongue in the domestic goose (Anser anser f. domestica) during the embryonic period. Protoplasma 254, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-015-0927-x.

Sturkie PD. (Ed.). 2012. Avian physiology. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4862-0.

Vergara MN, Canto-Soler MV. 2012. Rediscovering the chick embryo as a model to study retinal development. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-7-22.

Wolpert L, Beddington R, Jessell T, Lawrence P, Meyerowitz E, Smith J. 2002. Principles of Development. Oxford University Press 1, 2623–2625.

Zhu H, Gong H, Liu Q, Chen HH. 2018. Three-dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration. In: Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813149199_0003.

Submit Manuscript