Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | February 1, 2022

| Download

Comparative efficiency of different collection methods of carabid beetles in Eastern Visayas, Philippines

Myra A Abayon

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.20(2), 314-323, February 2022

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/20.2.314-323


IJB 2022 [Generate Certificate]


Two different methods (pitfall traps and hand picking) were used to sample carabid beetles in six forests of Eastern Visayas, namely: Lake Danao, Mt. Nacolod, Kuapnit Balinsasayao, Asug Forest, City Forest, and Closed Canopy on January to June of 2019. The total number of individuals caught using the two methods was 7844 carabids belonging to 25 genera and 49 species. Among these, 3,326 individuals, representing 41 species, were caught in pitfall traps, while the remaining 4,518 individuals, representing 49 species, were caught using handpicking or ground searching. Using Kruskal-Wallis test, indicated a no significant difference in the abundance and species richness per method of collection, i.e. handpicking vs. pitfall trapping (p-value = 0.2178). The study used four different baits in the pitfall trapping, namely: vinegar, mixture of ketchup and vinegar, fermented fish with vinegar, and ground meat. The use of fermented fish with vinegar has never been used before by any author and is a new bait method discovered by the researcher during the study. A total of 3,326 carabid individuals belonging to 40 species were collected. Fermented fish with vinegar garnered the highest number of indivuals at 1,894 (56.94%) of the total catch. Likewise, fermented fish with vinegar showed the highest diversity (5.168), high equitability, highest dominance (2.984) and richness (40) compared to other baits used in the pitfall trapping. The use of Kruskal-Wallis test indicates significant difference in the abundance and species richness per bait method in pitfall trapping.


Copyright © 2022
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Comparative efficiency of different collection methods of carabid beetles in Eastern Visayas, Philippines

Adis J. 1979. Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps. Zoologischer Anzeiger, Jena 202, 177- 184

Alderweireldt M, Desender K. 1990. Variation of carabid diel activity pat- terns in pastures and cultivated fields. See Ref 173, pp. 335-38

Andersen J. 1995. A comparison of pitfall trapping and quadrat sampling of Carabidae (Col.optera) on river banks. – Entomologica Fennica 6, 65-77.

Anika S. 2007. Towards combined methods for recording ground beetles: Pitfall traps, handpicking and sifting in Mediterranean habitats of Israel. Biodiversity Conservation 2, 398-410.

Baars MA. 1979. Catches in pitfall traps in relation to mean densities of carabid beetles. Oecologia (Berl.) 41, 25-46.

Briggs JB. 1961. A comparison of pitfall trapping and soil sampling in assessing populations of two species of ground beetles (Col.: Carabidae). Report of the East Malling Research Station 1960, 108-112.

Burakowski B. 1967. Biology, Ecology and Distribution of Amara pseudocommunis Burak. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Annales Zoologici 24(9), 485-523

Chiverton PA. 1984. Pitfall-trap catches of the carabid beetle Pterosrichus melu- nurius, in relation to gut contents and prey densities, in insecticide treated and untreated spring barley. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 3623-30

Clark MS, Luna JM, Youngman RR. 1995. Estimation of adult carabid absolute densities in a no-till corn field by removal sampling. Applied Soil Ecology 2, 185-193.

Davies MJ. 1953. The contents of the crops of some British carabid beetles. Entomologists Monthly Magazine 95, 25-28

Davies MJ. 2000. Beetles (Coleoptera) of Mkomazi. In: Coe M, McWilliam N, Stone G and Packer M (eds) Mkomazi: The ecology, biodiversity and conservation of a Tanzanian savanna

Dennison DF, Hodkinson ID. 1984. Structure of the predatory beetle com- munity in a woodland soil ecosystem. V. Summary and conclusions. Pedobi- ologia 26, 171-77

Desender K, Broeck D, Maelfait JP. 1985. Population biology and re- production in Pterostichus melanarius 111. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) from a heav- ily grazed pasture ecosystem. Med. Fac. Landbouwwet. Rijksuniv. Gent 50567- 15.

Drift J, Vander L. 1963. A comparative study of the soil fauna in forests and cultivated land on sandy soil in Suriname. In “Studies on the fauna of Suriname and other Guyanas”, vol. 6, eds. Geijskes, D. C. and Hummelink, P. W. Uitg. Natuurw. Stud-Kring Suriname 32, 1-42.

Duelli P, Obrist MK. 1998. In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas. Biodiversity Conservation 7, 297-309.

Duelli P. 1997. Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 62, 81-91.

Elphick CS. 2008. How you want to count counts: the importance of methods research in applied ecology. J. Appl. Ecol 45, 1313-1320.

Erbeling L. 1987. Thermal ecology of the desert carabid beetle Thermophilum (AnthiaJ sexmaculatwn F. (Coleovtera. Carabidae). A cia Phy topathol. Entbmol: Hung 22, 119-33

Forbes SA. 1883. The food relations of the Carabidae and Coccinellidae. Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History, Bulletin 1, 33-64

Ford RL. 1973. Studying Insects. A Practical Guide, Warne, London.

Freude H, Harde KW, Lohse GA. 1965. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. – Goecke & Evers, Krefeld p. 214.

Greenslade P, Greenslade PJM. 1971. The use of baits and preservatives in pitfall traps. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 10, 253-260.

Greenslade P. 1968. Habitat and altitude distribution of Carabidae (Coleoptera) in Argyll, Scotland. Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 120, 39-54.

Greenslade PJM. 1963. Daily rhythms of locomotory activity in some Carabi- dae (Coleoptera). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 6, 17 1-80

Harde KW. 1981. A Field Guide in Colour to Beetles, Octopus Books, London.

Hayes WB. 1970. The accuracy of pitfall trapping for the sand-beach isopod Tyros punclams. Ecology 51, 514-516.

Honek AZ, Martinkova P, Saska S. 2007. Size and taxonomic constraints determine the seed preferences of Carabidae. Basic and Applied Ecology 8, 343-353.

Johnson NE, Cameron RS. 1969. Phytophagous ground beetles. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62(4), 909-914.

Jones MG. 1979. The abundance and reproductive activity of common carabi- dae in a      winter wheat crop. Ecol. En- tomol. 413143.

Kegel B. 1990. Diurnal activity of carabid beetles living on arable land. See Ref. 173, pp. 65-76

Komonen A. 2003. Distribution and abundance of insect fungivores in the fruiting bodies of Fomitopsis pinicola Annales Zoologici Fennici 40, 495-504.

Larochelle A. 1990. The food of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae, including Cicindelinae). Fabreries, Supplement 5: Association des Entomologistes Amateurs du Québec

Luff ML. 1975. Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps. Oecologia (Berl.) 19, 345–357.

Luff ML. 1978. Diel activity patterns of some field Carabidae. Ecol. Entomol 3, 53-62

Luff ML. 1996. Environmental assessments using ground beetles carabidae and pitfall traps pp. 42–47 in Eyre, M.D. (Ed.) Environmental Monitoring, Surveillance and Conservation Using Invertebrates. Newcastle upon Tyne, EMS Publications.

Lund RD, Turpin FT. 1977. Carabid damage to weed seeds found in Indiana cornfields. Environmental Entomology 6(5), 695-698.

Mitchell B. 1963. Ecology of two carabid beetles, Bembidion lampros (Herbst) and Trechus quadristriatus (Schrank). II. Studies on populations of adults in the field, with special reference to the technique of pitfall trapping. Journal of Animal Ecology 32, 377-392.

Moosbeckhofer R. 1983. Laborunter- suchungen ueber den Einfluss von Diaz- inon, Carbofuran und Chlorfenvinphos auf die Laeufaktivitaet von Poecilus cu- preus L. (Col., Carabidae). Z Angew. Entomol 95, 15-21.

Niemela J, Haila Y, Halme E, Pajunen T, Punttila P. 1989. The annual activity cycle of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga. Annales Zoologici Fennici 26, 35-41.

Niemela J, Tukia H, Halme E. 1994. Patterns of carabid diversity in Finnish mature taiga. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31, 123-129.

Niemela J. 1988. Habitat occupancy of carabid beetles on small islands and the adjacent Aland mainland, SW Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici  25, 121-131.

Nyundo BA, Yarro JG. 2007. An Assessment of Methods for Sampling Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a Montane Rainforest. Tanz. J. Sci. 33, 123-131.

Nyundo BA. 2002a. Potential use of inexperienced field helpers in biodiversity surveys: the case of carabid beetle sampling. TAWIRI: Proceedings of the second annual scientific conference, Arusha, December –6, 2001, 179-192.

Oldroyd H. 1958. Collecting, Preserving and Studying Insects, Hutchinson Scientific and Technical, London.

Peka´r S. 2002. Differential effects of formaldehyde concentration and detergent on the catching efficiency of surface active artropods by pitfall traps. Pedobiologia 46, 539-547.

Prasifka JR, Lopez MD, Hellmich RL, Lewis LC, Dively GP. 2007. comparison of pitfall traps and litter bags for sampling ground-dwelling arthropods. -Journal of Applied Entomology 731, 775-720.

Rainio J, Niemela J. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae) as biodiversity indicators. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 487-506.

Refseth D. 1980. Ecological analyses of carabid communities- potential use in biological classification for nature conservation. Biol. Cons 17, 131-141.

Renner K. 1980. Faunistisch-ökologische Untersuchungen der Käferfaunapflanzensoziologisch unterschiedlicher Biotope im Evessell-Bruchbei Bielefeld Sennestadt. – Berichte desn aturwissens chaftlichen VereinsB ielefeld Sonderheft 2, 145-776.

Shough WW. 1940. The feeding of ground beetles. American Midland Naturalist 24, 336-344.

Skuhrav YV. 1959. [Diet of field carabids] Casopis Ceskoslov Spolecnosti Entomologick’e 56(1), 1-19.

Southwood TR, Henderson PA. 2000. Ecological Methods. Third Edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

Southwood TR. 1978. Ecological Methods. 524 pp. London, Chapman and Hall.

Spence JR, Niemela JK. 1994. Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: The madness and the method. The Canad. Entomol 126, 881-894.

Thiele HU. 1977. Carabid Beetles in Their Environments – A Study on Habitat Selection by Adaptations in Physiology and Behavior. 369 pp. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

Thunes KH, Willassen E. 1997. Species composition of beetles (Coleoptera) in bracket fungi Piptoporus betulinus and Fomes fomentarius (Aphyllophorales: Polyporaceae): an explorative approach with canonical correspondence analysis, Journal of Natural History 31, 471-486.

Tooley J, Brust GE. 2002. Weed Seed Predation in Carabid Beetles, in, Agroecology of Carabid Beetles, J. Holland, ed., Intercept Limited, Andover, UK. 215-229.

Webster FM. 1900. Harpalus caliginosus as a strawberry pest, with notes on other phytophagous Carabidae. Canadian Entomologist 32, 265-271.

White RE. 1983. A field guide to the beetles of North America. – Houghton Miffiin Company, Boston, NewYork. p. 384.

Williams RN, Ellis MS, Keeney G. 1994. Abait attractant study of the Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) at Shawnee State Forest in Southern Ohio, The Great Lakes Entomologist 27, 229-234.

Zilihona IJ, Nummelin M. 1999. A comparison of sampling techniques for insect biodiversity studies in remote areas of Tanzania: A case study of Udzungwa Mountains. Proceedings of the 4 the Scientific Conference of the Tanzania Entomological Association 96-102.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background