Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Comparative microarray data analysis of Arabidopsis genome during interaction with a mutualistic and a pathogenic bacteria

Research Paper | October 1, 2016

| Download 3

Nazeer Ahmed, Shahjahan Shabbir Ahmed, Fazalur Rehman, Muhammad Naeem Shahwani, Muhammad Saeed, Imran Ali Sani, Muhammad Naseem

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.9( 4), 281-291, October 2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/9.4.281-291


IJB 2016 [Generate Certificate]


Plants are in continuous interaction with both mutualistic and pathogenic microorganisms, particularly in the rhizosphere. Arabidopsis has served as an excellent model plant in a variety of experiments to determine the details and nature of such relationships. Studies involving transcriptome profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana in response to pathogenic and beneficial bacterial infection are available, each focusing primarily on defense related and plant growth promotion related genetic component respectively. In an attempt to decipher the difference in responses of plants to these two types of bacteria, we resorted to genome wide comparative analysis both when it was exposed to a foe and a friend. Publically accessible web based array data emanating from Arabidopsis responses to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC 3000 (Pst) a virulent pathogen that causes disease on tomato and Arabidopsis and Burkholderia phytofirmans Ps JN, a growth promoting rhizobacteria were used for the comparative approach using bioinformatics tools including GEO 2R, TAIR etc. The results, although, contained regulated genes common in both treatments, the differentially regulated genes unique to each data set predominated the common genes. The results clearly indicated that different sets of Arabidopsis genes were regulated when treated with pathogenic and mutualistic bacteria. Differences were also evident at pathways, cellular processes and the molecular function level. The findings call for a comprehensive and detailed analysis of those genes showing a dissimilar trend as far as changes in their expression pattern is concerned.


Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Comparative microarray data analysis of Arabidopsis genome during interaction with a mutualistic and a pathogenic bacteria

Ait Barka E, Gognies S, Nowak J, Audran JC, Belarbi A. 2002. Inhibitory effect of endophyte bacteria on (Botrytis cinerea) and its influence to promote the grapevine growth. Biological Control 24, 135-142.

Arabidopsis GI. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796.

Barrett T, Edgar R. 2006. Gene Expression Omnibus: Microarray Data Storage, Submission, Retrieval, and Analysis. Methods in enzymology 411, 352-369.

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289-300.

Cartieaux F, Thibaud MC, Zimmerli L, Lessard P, Sarrobert C, David P, Gerbaud A, Robaglia C, Somerville S, Nussaume L. 2003. Transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis colonized by a plant‐growth promoting rhizobacterium reveals a general effect on disease resistance. The Plant Journal 36, 177-188.

Compant S, Reiter B, Sessitsch A, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA. 2005. Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by plant growth promoting bacterium Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Applied and environmental microbiology 71, 1685-1693.

Davis S, Meltzer PS. 2007. GEOquery: a bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Bio Conductor. Bioinformatics 23, 1846-1847.

De Vos M, Van Oosten VR, Van Poecke RM, Van Pelt JA, Pozo MJ, Mueller MJ, Buchala AJ, Métraux JP, Van Loon L, Dicke M. 2005. Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Molecular plant-microbe interactions 18, 923-937.

Ditt RF, Kerr KF, de Figueiredo P, Delrow J, Comai L, Nester EW. 2006. The Arabidopsis thaliana Transcriptome in Response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 19, 665-681.

Drogue B, Sanguin H, Chamam A, Mozar M, Llauro C, Panaud O, Prigent-Combaret C, Picault N, Wisniewski-Dye F. 2014. Plant root transcriptome profiling reveals a strain-dependent response during Azospirillum-rice cooperation. Front Plant Sci 5.

Dupl’áková N, Reňák D, Hovanec P, Honysová B, Twell D, Honys D. 2007. Arabidopsis Gene Family Profiler (aGFP)–user-oriented transcriptomic database with easy-to-use graphic interface. BMC plant biology 7, 39.

Ghannam A, Alek H, Doumani S, Mansour D, Arabi MI. 2016. Deciphering the transcriptional regulation and spatiotemporal distribution of immunity response in barley to Pyrenophora graminea fungal invasion. BMC Genomics 17, 016-2573.

Gupta A, Sarkar AK, Senthil-Kumar M. 2016. Global Transcriptional Analysis Reveals Unique and Shared Responses in Arabidopsis thaliana Exposed to Combined Drought and Pathogen Stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 7.

Harmer SL, Kay SA. 2000. Microarrays: determining the balance of cellular transcription. Plant Cell 12, 613-616.

Heller MJ. 2002. DNA microarray technology: devices, systems, and applications. Annual review of biomedical engineering 4, 129-153.

Hirano SS, Upper CD. 2000. Bacteria in the Leaf Ecosystem with Emphasis onPseudomonas syringae– a Pathogen, Ice Nucleus, and Epiphyte. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64, 624-653.

Jones JD, Dangl JL. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323-329.

Katagiri F, Thilmony R, He SY. 2002. The Arabidopsis thaliana-Pseudomonas syringae interaction. The Arabidopsis Book/American Society of Plant Biologists 1.

Kazan K, Schenk PM, Wilson I, Manners JM. 2001. DNA microarrays: new tools in the analysis of plant defence responses. Mol Plant Pathol 2, 177-185.

Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, Muller R, Dreher K, Alexander DL, Garcia-Hernandez M. 2012. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic acids research 40, D1202-D1210.

Lee C-W, Efetova M, Engelmann JC, Kramell R, Wasternack C, Ludwig-Müller J, Hedrich R, Deeken R. 2009. Agrobacterium tumefaciens promotes tumor induction by modulating pathogen defense in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell Online 21, 2948-2962.

Marathe R, Guan Z, Anandalakshmi R, Zhao H, Dinesh-Kumar S. 2004. Study of Arabidopsis thalianaresistome in response to cucumber mosaic virus infection using whole genome microarray. Plant molecular biology 55, 501-520.

Martin GB, Bogdanove AJ, Sessa G. 2003. Understanding the functions of plant disease resistance proteins. Annual review of plant biology 54, 23-61.

Nowak J, Sharma V, A’Hearn E. 2002. Endophyte enhancement of transplant performance in tomato, cucumber and sweet pepper. Pages 253-263. XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Issues and Advances in Transplant Production and Stand Establishment Research 631.

Postnikova OA, Nemchinov LG. 2012. Comparative analysis of microarray data in Arabidopsis transcriptome during compatible interactions with plant viruses. Virol J 9, 9-101.

Poupin MJ, Timmermann T, Vega A, Zuñiga A, González B. 2013a. Effects of the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium (Burkholderia phytofirmans) PsJN throughout the Life Cycle of (Arabidopsis thaliana). PLoS ONE 8, e69435.

Poupin MJ, Timmermann T, Vega A, Zuniga A, Gonzalez B. 2013b. Effects of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 8, e69435.

Sessitsch A, Coenye T, Sturz A, Vandamme P, Barka EA, Salles J, Van Elsas J, Faure D, Reiter B, Glick B. 2005. Burkholderia phytofirmans sp. nov., a novel plant-associated bacterium with plant-beneficial properties. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 55, 1187-1192.

Singh BK, Millard P, Whiteley AS, Murrell JC. 2004. Unravelling rhizosphere–microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations. Trends in microbiology 12, 386-393.

Smyth GK. 2004. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3, 3.

Thilmony R, Underwood W, He SY. 2006. Genome‐wide transcriptional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana interaction with the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the human pathogen Escherichia coli O157: H7. The Plant Journal 46, 34-53.

Thimm O, Bläsing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Krüger P, Selbig J, Müller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M. 2004. mapman: a user‐driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. The Plant Journal 37, 914-939.

Thomma BP, Cammue BP, Thevissen K. 2002. Plant defensins. Planta 216, 193-202.

Van Loon L. 2007. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119, 243-254.

Wang Y, Ohara Y, Nakayashiki H, Tosa Y, Mayama S. 2005a. Microarray analysis of the gene expression profile induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens FPT9601-T5 in Arabidopsis. Molecular plant-microbe interactions 18, 385-396.

Wang Y, Ohara Y, Nakayashiki H, Tosa Y, Mayama S. 2005b. Microarray analysis of the gene expression profile induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens FPT9601-T5 in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18, 385-396.

Whalen MC, Innes RW, Bent AF, Staskawicz BJ. 1991. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pathogens of Arabidopsis and a bacterial locus determining avirulence on both Arabidopsis and soybean. The Plant Cell Online 3, 49-59.

Wise RP, Moscou MJ, Bogdanove AJ, Whitham SA. 2007. Transcript profiling in host-pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45, 329-369.

Zhang H, Kim M-S, Krishnamachari V, Payton P, Sun Y, Grimson M, Farag MA, Ryu C-M, Allen R, Melo IS. 2007. Rhizobacterial volatile emissions regulate auxin homeostasis and cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Planta 226, 839-851.