Comparative performance evaluation of intercultural implements in cotton field

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2019
Views (296) Download (23)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparative performance evaluation of intercultural implements in cotton field

Muhammad Kazim Nawaz, Zia-Ul-Haq, Muhammad Yasin, Asim Gulzar, Muhammad Ansar, Talha Mehmood
Int. J. Biosci.15( 4), 507-514, October 2019.
Certificate: IJB 2019 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium) is an essential oil seed and fabric cash crop, lifeline for textile and palm-oil industry of Pakistan. It is planted during “summer” season from April to June, mainly in two provinces with Punjab 75% and Sindh 25% of the total area. Major cause of low productivity in cotton is the heavy weed infestation. Effective weed control is vital, as weeds uses most of space, sunlight, water and nutrients due to their fast growth habits. Various kinds of pre and post emergence herbicides are under use in cotton. Their excessive use degrading air, water, soil environment and quality of produce. To protect environment and to attain sustainable development goals a small scale intercultural implement suitable for small farmers under existing condition of cotton was developed during 2018-19. Three shapes of blades (L, C, and J) were designed and fabricated. Implement performance was tested under local condition of South Punjab for cotton at Maher-Rab-Nawaz-Sial Agriculture Farm, Mukhiana tehsil and district Jhang. Field performance was tested for weeding efficiency, plant damage, speed, depth, theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, fuel consumption and operational cost. Its performance was compared with the available rotary weeder. The data recorded for each parameter was statistical analyzed using Randomized Complete Block Design. Statistical software 8.1 was used for ANOVA and treatment means were compared at 5% level of probability. It was concluded that the performance of L-shaped blade was better in cotton field as compared to other types of blades.

VIEWS 27

Anonymous. 2011. Economic Survey, Economic Affairaca Division, Govt. Pakistan., Islamabad.

Bean C. 2019. Pakistan Cotton and Products Annual Cotton and Products Annual 2019. USDA Foreign Agriculture Service. Globle Agriculture information network.

Chavan M, Sachin C, Ashutosh R, Piyush S, Digvijay M. 2015. Design and development of weed removal implement. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology 3(5), 526-532.

Gavali M, Satish Kulkarni. 2014. Development of rotary weeder blades by Finite Element Method. International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology 3(6), 941-945.

Islam AS, Islam MT, Islam MS, Rahman AL, Rahman MA. 2017. Performance Evaluation of BRRI Power Weeder for Low Land Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivation. The Agriculturists 15(1), 40-48.

Jeevarathinam A, Velmurugan C. 2014. Design Modification and Analysis of Rotavator Blade, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering pp.43-50.

Karnkal US. 2013. Design and development of self-propelled weeder for field crops. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 6, 304-310.

Manjunatha K, Anantachar M, Prakash KV, Desai BK, Vijayakumar P. 2016. Development and evaluation of tractor operated rotary weeder. Environment and Ecology 34(4), 1643-1648.

Rajashekar M, Heblikar VK, Mohan Kumar S. 2014. Simulation and analyze low cost weeder. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3(3), 543-549.

Thorat Deepak S, Shoo PK, Dipankar De, Mir Asif Iquebal. 2014. Design and Development of Ridge Profile Power Weeder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 51(4), October-December, (2014).