Comparative performance of static and re-circulating close hydroponic system for lettuce production

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2019
Views (741)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparative performance of static and re-circulating close hydroponic system for lettuce production

Abdul Qadeer, Zia-Ul-Haq, Shahid Javed Butt, Asim Gulzar, Talha Mehmood
Int. J. Biosci. 15(4), 401-407, October 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) is commonly used as salads although it is also seen in different kinds of foods; soups, sandwiches and wraps. In Pakistan conventional lettuce production techniques are unable to meet market requirements during offseason while consumers demands for regular year-round supply. In this scenario, alternative farming practices; nutrient film technique (NFT) a liquid hydroponic system was developed. NFT is an innovative food production system having a high yield promise. Keeping in view the market demand of lettuce an experiment was conducted at Hydroponic Research Station Rawat, Institute of Hydroponic Agriculture, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi. Experiment was performed for the testing of static and re-circulating close hydroponic system and the comparison of different treatments was made in greenhouse conditions. Growth and yield parameters was recorded regularly throughout the life cycle of crop. Crop parameters include plant height, number of leaves per plant, length of leaf, breadth of leaf, and yield per plant in eight treatments (T1, T2,T3…..T8) were measured. To take the average data five plants were selected from each treatment. The data was statistically analyzed by using Completely Randomized Design (CRD) at 5% level of probability. Comparatively better yield was observed in re-circulating nutrient film technique.

Barbosa GL, Daiane F, Gadelha A, Kublik N, Proctor A, Reichelm L, Halden RU. 2015. Comparison of Land, Water , and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs Conventional Agricultural Methods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, 6879-6891.

Christie EC. 2014. Water and Nutrient Reuse within Closed Hydroponic Systems. Electronic Theses & Dissertations. Paper 1096.

Kaiser C, Ernst M. 2016. Hydroponic Lettuce. CCD- CP-63. Lexington, KY: Center for Crop Diversification, University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment.

Kratky BA. 2015. Growing Direct-Seeded Watercress by Two Non-Circulating Hydroponic Methods.

Mohammed SB, Sookoo R. 2017. Nutrient Film Technique for Commercial Production. Agricultural Science Research Journal 6(11), 269-274.

Nelson PV. 2012. Greenhouse operation and management. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Sharma, Acharya, Kumar, Singh, Chaurasia. 2018. Hydroponics as an advanced technique for vegetable production: An overview. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 17(4), 364-371.

Singh H, Bruce D. 2016. Electrial conductivity and pH guide for hydroponics. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets, HLA-6722. Oklahoma State University, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources p. 5.

Souza RS De, Rezende R, Hachmann TL, Lozano CS, Felipe A, Alves B, Freitas L De. 2017. Lettuce production in a greenhouse under fertigation with nitrogen and potassium silicate. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 39(2), 211-216.

Touliatos D, Dodd IC, Mcainsh M. 2016. Vertical farming increases lettuce yield per unit area compared to conventional horizontal hydroponics. Food and Energy Security 5(3), 184-191.

Xu X, MK Loke, P Leung. 2015. Is There a Price Premium for Local Food? The Case of the Fresh Lettuce Market in Hawaii. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 44, 110-123.

Related Articles

Muscle type and meat quality of local chickens according to preslaughter transport conditions and sex in Benin

Assouan Gabriel Bonou*, Finagnon Josée Bernice Houéssionon, Kocou Aimé Edenakpo, Serge Gbênagnon Ahounou, Chakirath Folakè Arikè Salifou, Issaka Abdou Karim Youssao, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 241-250, December 2025.

Effects of micronutrients and timing of application on the agronomic and yield characteristics of cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Princess Anne C. Lagcao, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 214-240, December 2025.

Response of different soybean varieties to phosphorus fertilizer microdosing and rhizobium inoculation in the sub-humid zone of Northern Benin

Pierre G. Tovihoudji*, Kamarou-Dine Seydou, Lionel Zadji, Sissou Zakari, Valerien A. Zinsou, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 201-213, December 2025.

On-farm validation of black soldier fly larvae meal as a sustainable replacement for shrimp meal in rainbow trout diets in the mid hills of Nepal

Ishori Singh Mahato, Krishna Paudel*, Sunita Chand, Anshuka Bhattarai, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 189-200, December 2025.

Insect fauna associated with Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae) in Parakou, A cotton-growing area of central Benin

Lionel Zadji*, Mohamed Yaya, Roland Bocco, Prudencia M. Tovignahoua, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, Hugues Baimey, Leonard Afouda, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 175-188, December 2025.

First record of two hymenopteran species, Brachymeria excarinata Gahan (Chalcididae) and Pteromalus sp. (Pteromalidae), as hyperparasitoids of Diadegma insulare in Senegal

Babacar Labou*, Etienne Tendeng, Mamadou Diatte, El hadji Sérigne Sylla, Karamoko Diarra, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 167-174, December 2025.

Hepatoprotective and antinociceptive effects of terpinolene in streptozotocin-induced diabetic peripheral neuropathic rats

Ravishankar Sarumathi, Muthukumaran Preethi, Chandrasekaran Sankaranarayanan*, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 156-166, December 2025.