Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | August 1, 2021

VIEWS 2
| Download

Comparative Studies of Different Biochemical Parameters in various organs of Gallus gallus domesticus of Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan

Ali Khan Dahar, Shahid Ali Jakhrani, Mushtaque Ali Jakhrani, Atta Hussain Rind, Farkhanda Zaman Dayo, Javed Ahmed Ujjan, Hafeezullah Mazari, Sanaullah Ansari

Key Words:


Int. J. Biosci.19(2), 206-210, August 2021

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/19.2.206-210

Certification:

IJB 2021 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Present study was undertaken to evaluate the biochemical composition in different body parts of Gallus gallus domesticus. Samples were collected from two sites of Khairpur city and its surroundings for assessment of various biochemical parameters such as protein, fat, moister and ash contents in different parts like intestine, heart, gizzard, lung, kidney, liver and muscle. The slaughtered chickens of uniform sizes were transported for further processes to Institute of Chemistry Lab, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur. After this dissection, digestion and analysis was performed by the help of different methods and instrumentation. It was observed that all investigated parameters found high in main city sampling site as compared to samples collected from surroundings of city. Although the protein contents were found high in both sampling sites main city and its surroundings, as muscle contains (0.68, 0.61µg-1), gizzards (0.64, 0.58µg-1), heart (0.61, 0.55µg-1), intestine (0.53, 0.46µg-1), kidneys (0.45, 0.43µg-1), lungs (0.40, 0.38µg-1) and liver has (0.34, 0.35µg-1). The percentage of fat accumulation followed by gizzards<kidneys<muscle<liver<intestines<heart<lungs. However no significant difference was noted in percentage of moister and ash contents in all organs of chicken samples possibly due to equal quantity of (WAI) of chicken body.

VIEWS 2

Copyright © 2021
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Comparative Studies of Different Biochemical Parameters in various organs of Gallus gallus domesticus of Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan

Besbes B. 2009. Genotype evaluation and breeding of poultry for performance under sub-optimal village conditions. World’s Poultry Science Journal 65(2), 260-271.

Bessei W. 2008. The problems of extension in rural poultry production in developing countries. Archiv fuer Gefluegelkunde (Germany, FR).

Brisbin Jr IL, Peterson AT. 2007. Playing chicken with red junglefowl: identifying phenotypic markers of genetic purity in Gallus gallus. Animal Conservation 10(4), 429-435.

Charrondiere UR. 2004. Impact of different macronutrient definitions and energy conversion factors on energy supply estimations. Journal of food composition and analysis 17(3-4), 339-360.

Dolberg F. 2003. A Review of Household Poultry Production as a Tool in Poverty Reduction with Focus on Bangladesh and India (No. 855-2016-56226).

Dutta RK, Islam MS, Kabir MA. 2013. Production performance of indigenous chicken (Gallus domesticus L.) in some selected areas of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 308-323.

Elfick D. 2011. A Brief History of Broiler Selection: How Chicken Became a Global Food Phenomenon in 50 Y ears.

England PR, Cornuet JM. 2006. Estimating effective population size from linkage disequilibrium: severe bias in small samples. Conservation Genetics 7(2), 303.

Eriksson J, Larson G. 2008. Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. PLoS Genet 4(2), e10.

Farooq M, Shakir MK. 2004. Status of backyard chicken reared by women in Chitral, Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal (Pakistan).

Farooq M, Shoukat K. 2000. Impact of female livestock extension workers on rural household chicken production. Livestock Research for Rural Development 12(4), p. 1.

Fentie T, Abebe B, Kassa T. 2013. Small-scale family poultry production in north Gondar: characteristics, productivity and constraints. Livestock Research for Rural Development 25(9).

Fulton JE, Berres ME. 2017. MHC-B variability within the Finnish Landrace chicken conservation program. Poultry science 96(9), 3026-3030.

Halima H, Neser FWC. 2007. Phenotypic variation of native chicken populations in northwest Ethiopia. Tropical animal health and production 39(7), 507-513.

Hill WG. 2002. August. Direct effects of selection on phenotypic variability of quantitative traits. In Proc. 7th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier (pp. 19-23).

Hill WG, Zhang XS. 2004. Effects on phenotypic variability of directional selection arising through genetic differences in residual variability. Genetics Research 83(2), 121-132.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background