Comparative study of effect of TYLCV and Septoria blight on F3 tomato lines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2016
Views (696)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparative study of effect of TYLCV and Septoria blight on F3 tomato lines

Mehboob Ahmad, Zishan Gul, Mazhar Iqbal, Bilal Ahmad Khan, Zaheer Ullah khan, Muhammad Shahid, Adil Rehman
Int. J. Biosci. 8(5), 229-235, May 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The project was undertaken to compare the effect of TYLCV and Septoria blight infection on F3 population of tomato (Solanum Lycopercicum L) lines in order to find which of two diseases is more destructive and to screen resistant F3 lines. The research was conducted at Hazara agricultural research station Abbottabad during August-December 2015.Variablity data indicates that CV(co-efficient of variation) was highest for yield/plant(123.72%) followed by No of fruits/plant while lowest CV was noted for TYLCV severity and incidence. Minimum range for all the parameters was 0 while, maximum range for TYLCV and septoria blight severity was recorded to be 5.Maximum range for TYLCV and septoria blight incidence was noted to be 100. Maximum range of yield/plant,fruit weight and number of fruits was found to be 650,70, and 9,respectively.Negative value of correlation was found between TYLCV severity and incidence to yield and yield components. Data collected on TYLCV severity and incidence exhibits that the disease has caused reduction in yield and No of fruits to zero in some lines i.e L4,L6,L11,L12 and L13 while Septoria blight severity and incidence results shows that the disease has moderate effect on yield i.e in L5 and L14,inspite of highest disease severity (5), yield/plant was recorded as 166.5grams and 180 grams.

Akram W, Anjum T, Hanif S, Fatima S, Mahboob A, Javed AA. 2014.Screening of native and exotic tomato germplasm for their susceptibility to tomato yellow leaf curl virus and its effect on their agro-economic performance under field conditions. Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences 1(4), 305-309.

Barbieri M, Acciarri N, Sabatini E, Sardo L, Accotto GP, Pecchioni N. 2010.Introgression of resistance to two mediterranean virus species causing tomato yellow leaf curl into a valuable traditional tomato variety. Journal of Plant Pathology 92(2), 485-493

Blum   LEB.  2000.  Reduction  of  incidence  and severity of septoria lycopersici leaf spot of tomato with bacteria and yeasts. Ciencia Rural    30(5), 761-765.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S010384782000000500003

Consuegra OG, Gómez MP, Zubiaur YM. 2015. Pyramiding TYLCV and TSWV resistance genes in tomato genotypes. Revista de Protección Vegetal 30(2), 2224-4697.

Delahaut K, Stevenson W. 2004. Tomato disorders: Early blight and septoria leaf spot. The University of Wisconsin.

Delatte H, Martin DP, Naze F, Golbach RW, Reynaud B, Lett JM. 2005. South West Indian Ocean islands tomato begomovirus populations represent a new major monopartite begomovirus group. Journal of General Virology 86, 1533-1542.

Ferrandino FJ, Elmer WH. 1992.Reduction in tomato yield due to Septoria leaf spot.Plant diseases 76(2), 208-211.

Green SK, Kalloo G. 1994. Leaf curl and yellowing viruses of pepper and tomato: An overview. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre, Shanhua, Taiwan.

Gul Z, Ahmad M, Khan ZU, Khan B. Iqbal M.2016 Evaluation of Tomato Lines againstSeptoria Leaf Spot under Field Conditions and Its Effect on Fruit Yield. Agricultural Sciences 7, 181-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2016.74018

Joshi BK. 2011. Molecular Tagging of Resistance Genes to Septoria Leaf Spot and Late Blight in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Master thesis, North Carolina State University.

Joshi BK. 2011.Molecular Tagging of Resistance Genes to Septoria Leaf Spot and Late Blight in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Master thesis, North Carolina State University.

Kaya HB, Tanyolaç B. 2009. Screening of F3 Segregation opulation Lines Revealed by Ty-1 Markers Linked to Resistance Locus of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Disease (TYLCD) in Tomato (Lycopersicum. Esculentum). International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences 33, 149-153,

Köklü G, Rojas A, Kvarnheden A. 2006. Molecular identification and the complete nucleotide sequence of a tomato yellow leaf curl virus isolate from turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology 88(1), 61-66.

Lapidot M, Friedmann M, Lachman O, Antignus Y, Nahon S, Pilowsky M. 1997.Comaparision of resistance level to tomato yellow leaf curl virus among commercial cultivars and breeding lines.Plant Diseases 81, 1425-1428.

Lee JM, Oh CS, Yeam I. 2015.Molecular Markers for Selecting Diverse Disease Resistances in Tomato Breeding Programs. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 3(4), 308-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2015.3.4.308

Lukyanenko AN. 1991. Disease Resistance in Tomato. In: Kalloo, G., Ed., Genetic Improvement of Tomato, Vol. 14,Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Springer, Berlin, 99-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84275-7_9

Osei MK, Akroma R, Lampty JNL, Quain MD. 2012. Phenotypic and molecular screening of some tomato germplasm for resistance to yellow leaf curl viral disease in Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 4675-4684. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.672

Parker SK, Nutter Jr FW, Gleason ML. 2001. Directional Spread of Septoria Leaf Spot in Tomato Rows. Plant Disease 81, 272-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.3.272

Schuster D, Polston J. 1999. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. In:Whitefly management guide: Citrus and Vegetable.

Tu J, Poysa V. 1990. A brushing method of inoculation for screening tomato seedlings for resistance to septoria lycoperci.Plant diseases 74, 294-297.

Vidavsky F, Czosnek H. 1998.Tomato Breeding Lines Resistant and Tolerant to Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus Issued from Lycopersicon hirsutum. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 88(9), 910-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.9.910

Watt  BA.  2000.  Septoria  Leaf  Spot  of  Tomato. University of Maine-Fact Sheet.

Zhengxing L. 1999.Screening for resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Report, Asian regional center, AVRDC, Taiwan.

Related Articles

Modelling the current and future distribution of Okoubaka aubrevillei Pellegr. & Normand under climate change scenarios in Côte d’Ivoire

Sié Fernand Pacôme Ouattara, Franck Placide Junior Pagny, Kouassi Bruno Kpangui, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 237-246, November 2025.

Proximate analysis of pelleted sorghum-based feeds as substitute for corn

I. I. Juan S. Daquioag, Michael M. Uy, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 232-236, November 2025.

Evolution of the weight of carcasses and offal of Cobb 500 broiler chickens according to the age of slaughter

Soro Soronikpoho, Kouadio Kouakou Parfait, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, Brou Gboko Konan Gatien, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 225-231, November 2025.

Agronomic performance of the newly pruned coffee trees at the CSU Lal-lo old coffee plantation

Maribel L. Fernandez, Florante Victor M. Balatico, Ronel A. Collado, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 217-224, November 2025.

A comprehensive review and meta-analysis on Alzheimer’s genetics: Exploring the genetic architecture and its application in future genomic medicine

Shafee Ur Rehman, Shabeer Khan, Muhammad Usman, Sakarie Khadar Ibrahim, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 204-216, November 2025.

Effect of aqueous leaf extract of Senna occidentalis (Fabaceae) on induced arrhythmia in Rabbits

Obrou Jean Luc Amiltone, Nagalo Ousmane, Mossoun Mossoun Arsène, Abo Kouakou Jean-Claude, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 198-203, November 2025.

Targeting proteolytic enzymes in the hemoglobin degradation pathway to inhibit Plasmodium falciparum: An in silico approach

Sethupathi Virumandi, Elumalai Balamurugan, Aakash Ganesan, Sowmiya Ganesan, Srinidhi Raveenthiran, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 182-197, November 2025.

Composition and variation of milk from Djallonké goats fed with different diets in Burkina Faso

Alice Gisèle Sidibé-Anago, Vinsoun Millogo, Assouan Gabriel Bonou, Remadji Rufine Djikoldingam, Mariétou Sissao, Michel Kéré, Guy Apollinaire Mensah, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 173-181, November 2025.