Comparative study of soil physical properties of higher and lower elevation of Loralai Balochistan Pakistan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2020
Views (435) Download (20)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparative study of soil physical properties of higher and lower elevation of Loralai Balochistan Pakistan

Wajia Noor, Bibi Sadia, Saba kazmi, Asyia, Yasmeen Rehmat, Junaid Ahmad, Yasmeen
Int. J. Biosci.16( 6), 90-97, June 2020.
Certificate: IJB 2020 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Soil is a dynamic and complicated system of living, dead and decaying organisms with residual mineral materials, organic substances, air and water. Studying soil properties can help the concerned people to make best soil management decisions. The present research was carried out to investigate Loralai top soil by comparative study of area’s soil on higher and lower elevation from both the cultivated plans and non-cultivated plans. Soil was collected from four different elevations mountain sites, barren plan, cultivated fresh water site and cultivated drainage water site from the depths of 0-5, 5-10 and 10-15cm. The physical properties were analysed in laboratory in three replicated samples of each elevation and each depth. 36 soil samples were analysed by using physical parameters. These soil physical parameters were soil color, soil taxture, soil structure, soil profile, soil pH, soil conductivity, soil soluble salt content, soil bulk density, soil porosity and soil water holding capacity. It was observed that soil bulk density and water holding capacity values were maximum in the all depths of mountain site clay soil while minimum in sandy barren plan. Soil porosity was maximum in sandy plan and minimum in mountain site soil. Best porosity, PH, porosity and water holding capacity was observed for drainage exposed soil. Results concluded that there is no significant effect of elevation on soil physical characters. Physical properties are directly related with soil texture. Soil with clay-sand loamy taxture was analyzed and best soil for all physical parameters.

VIEWS 24

Cambi M, Certini G, Fabiano F, Foderi C, Laschi A, Picchio R. 2015. Impact of wheeled and tracked tractors on soil physical properties in a mixed conifer stand. Forest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 863.

Cheng JT, Chang WC. 2001. Effects of auxins and cytokinins on direct somatic embryogenesison leaf explants of Oncidium’Gower Ramsey’. Plant Growth Regulation 34(2), 229-232.

Dawoodi V, Madani M, Tahmourespour A, Golshani Z. 2015. The Study of Heterotrophic and Crude Oil-utilizing Soil Fungi in Crude Oil Contaminated Regions. Journal of Bioremediation and Biodegredation 6(2), 1.

Foster I, Kesselman C. Tuecke S. 2001. The anatomy of the grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations. International journal of high performance computing applications 15(3), 200-222.

García RA, Fuentes RA, Pauchard A. 2012. Effects of two nitrogen-fixing invasive plants species on soil chemical properties in south-central Chile. Gayana Bot 69(1).

Ruiz EC, Ruiz AC, Vaca R, Aguila P, Lugo J. 2015. Assessment of Soil Parameters Related With Soil Quality in Agricultural Systems. Life Science Journal 12(1).

Sarangzai AM, Siddiqui MF, Ahmed M, Hussain MI, Laghari SK, Ahmed A. 2015. Relationship between soil properties and natural regeneration pattern of Juniperus excelsa forest in Ziarat, Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 47(3), 905-910.

Schoenholtz SH, Van MH, Burger JA. 2000. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. Forest ecology and management, 138(1), 335-356.

Sevgi O, Tecimen HB. 2009. Physical, chemical and pedogenetical properties of soil in relation with altitude at Kazdagi upland black pine forest. Journal of environmental Biology 30(3), 349-354.