Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | June 1, 2013

| Download 3

Comparison of AHP, network and systemic analysis methods in assessment of ecological capability in Gisum Forest Park

Shiva Bolandraftar, Iraj Hasanzad Navroudi, Ali Reza Eslami, Hamid Reza Maskani

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.3(6), 157-164, June 2013

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.6.157-164


IJB 2013 [Generate Certificate]


Assessment of ecological capability for the reason necessary of selection and optimal exploitation of land ecological potential has been spatially important for to sustainability development. In this study to determine the ecotourism and recreational potential Gisum forest park in the Giulan Province of Iran used from three methods: Systemic Analysis Method, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Network Methods. For systemic analysis method, the ecological resources in the study area were identified. Then making integration and intelligence informational layers and analysis them in geographic information systems (GIS) to be accomplished and identified fit palaces as 2 intensive recreation zones and 1 extensive recreation zone. According to the results, the area hasn’t 1 class of intensive recreation (high potential). The area of 2 class of intensive recreation zone obtained 49.55 %, intensive of 3class with 35.9% and 1class of extensive recreation zone 14.55%. In AHP, priority to identified effective factors and then valuation criteria achieved based on pair wise comparison technique and using by Expert Choice software. As the result was evaluated 47.7% of the area with high potential and 52.3% of the area with moderated potential. In the network approach divides initially the study area into 24 networks and associated ecological resources were identified and scored based on several characteristics. In this method 20.67% of the region evaluated with high and 75.16% with well and 3.5% with moderate and 0.67% with weak potential. The results indicated that is incumbent different models are corresponded to local conditions and then used in order to maintain its effectiveness for use in different areas.


Copyright © 2013
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Comparison of AHP, network and systemic analysis methods in assessment of ecological capability in Gisum Forest Park

Amiri F, Basiri M, Chanechi, MR. 2008. Application of Analysis Hierarchical Process (AHP) in priority of utilization measuring methods for Eurotia ceratoides. Natural Resources of Iran Journal 60, 637 – 651.

Bunruamkaew Kh, Murayama Y. 2011.Site suitability evaluation for ecoturism using GIS & AHP: a case study of start Thani Province, Thailand, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21,269-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su4030412

Fennell D. 2008. Ecotourism and the myth of indigenous stewardship. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16, 129–149.

Gülez S, Demiral ö. 2004. An Evaluation method for the determination of forest recreation potential: A case study Contryside Recreation. CNR’s Professional Journal,12:26-34.

Hathout S. 2002. The use of GIS for monitoring and predicting urban growth in East and West st paul, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canadian Journal of Environmental Management, 66: 229- 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0596

Jinyang DB, King Thomas B. 2002. Evaluating natural attraction for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 29: 422 – 438.

Kumar D, Singh P, lal M, Kherawat B, kumar B, Kumar R. 2013. Monitoring and Modeling of Baghin River Basin part of Uttar Pradesh Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. International Journal of Forest, Soil and Erosion, 3, 64-67.

Li-Wei L, Chui-Hui C. 2008. Applying the grey assessment  to  the  evaluation  system  of  ecological green space on greening projects in Taiwan. Journal Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 136, 129-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9670-x

Miczkowski A. 2006. Weather and climate – Related information for tourism, tourism and Hospitality planning & Development,3, 99-115.

MirRiahi S. 2009. A Methodology for the Placement of Land Use in the Environment, Environmental Sciences Journal, 6, 155-166.

Newsome D, Cole DN, Marion J. 2004. Environmental impacts associated with recreational horse-riding, Environmental impacts of ecotourism, 61–82.

Ownegh M, Ghanghormeh A, Abedi Gh. 2006. Land use management plan for southeastern coasts of Caspian Sea: (introducing a numerical model for ecological potential assessment and land use planning). J. Agric. Sci. Nature resources. 13, 139-151.

Panahandeh M, Arastou B, Ghavidel A, Ghanbari F. 2010. Use of Analytical Hierarchy Process Model (AHP) in Landfill Site Selection of Semnan Town. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment 2, 276-283.

Ramakrishna N.2003. Production system planning for natural resource conservation in a micro-watershade, Electronic green journal 18, 1-10.

Rossiter DG. 1996. A theorical framework for land evaluation. Geoderama. 72: 165-190.

Sener M. 2004. Landfill Site Selection by Using Geographic Information system. M.Sc. Thesis, METU, 114.

Sicat RS, Carranza EM, Nidumolu UB. 2005. Fuzzy modeling of farmers knowledge for land suitability classification, Agricultural Systems,.83, 49-75

Sinun w, LIM-Hasegava D, suhaimi J.2002. peeking into the Eco-Tourism potential of the Sabah s lost world “the basis in conservation area”.wisma mannoprise,kota kinaba lu sabah.9.

Smailes J, Smith L. 2001. The growing recreational use of state forest lands in the Adelide hills. Land use policy. 18, 137-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00003-5

Xiong Y, Zeng G, Chen G, Tang L, Wang K, Huang D. 2007.   Combining  AHP  with  GIS  in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—A case  study  of  Hunan  Province,  China,  ecological modelling 209, 97–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.007

Yousefpour M, Naghdi R, Moradmand Jalali A. 2013. The investigation of the usability  of GIS facilities for planning forest roads network in Iranian Caspian forest. International Journal of Forest, Soil and Erosion, 3, 26-31.

Zanin E, Santos J, Oliveria C. 2005.Enviromental Analyze and Zoning for an Urban Park Management purpose.Bralizian Archives of Biology and Technology48: 647-655.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background