Comparison of maize hybrids effect on seed traits

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2015
Views (814)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparison of maize hybrids effect on seed traits

Mahtab Jalili, Peyman Eyvazi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(1), 178-182, January 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In order to determine the growing characteristics and detecting the morphological bases of yield difference, study of relations between different traits with each other and with grain yield, determining the most important effective traits on yield in hybrids of seed corn and comparison of native and foreign hybrids had been studied and classification of them had been done on the basis of morphological traits. For this purpose an experiment carried out in 2007 at Moghan agricultural research center. In this experiment, 28 hybrids of seed corn (18 foreigner hybrids and 10 native hybrids) were studied in two different experiments with using a complete randomized block designed in 4 replications. Orthogonal comparison showed that the yield of foreign hybrids were higher than native one and it was arised from the 1000- grain weight, deep of seed, plant height, length of tassel, number of leaves on the top of the ear, number of days to pollen shedding, number of days to silking and number of days to physiological ripping in foreign hybrids.

Ahmad S Q, Khan S, Ghaffar M and Ahmad F. 2011. Genetic Diversity Analysis for Yield and Other Parameters in Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes. Asian Journal of Agricultural Science 3(5), 385-388.

Bekavac G, Purar B and Jockovic D. 2008. Relationships between line per se and testcross performance for agronomic traits in two broad-based populations. Euphytica 162, 363-369.

Chand H, Srivastava I S and Trehan R B. 1975. Estimates of genetic parameters, correlation coefficient and path coefficient analysis in gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Madras Agricultural Journal 62, 178-181.

Elliot PC, Franje HS and Moody K. 1993. Effect of tillage on upland crops and weeds in Claveria, Misamis Oriental. Philippine Journal Weed Science 20, 62 – 71.

Fasoula VA and Tollenaar M. 2005. The impact of plant population density on crop yield and response to selection in maize. Maydica 50 (1), 39-48.

Gravaes K A and Helms R S. 1992. Path analysis of rice yield and yield components as affected by seeding rate. Agronomy Journal 84, 1-4.

Guo J, Su G, Zhang J and Wang G. 2008. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of maize yield and associate agronomic traits under semi-arid land condition. African Journal of Biotechnology 7, 1829-1838.

Ipsilandis CG and Vafias BN. 2005. Plant density effects on grain yield per plant: Breeding implications. Asian Journal Plant Science 4 (1), 31 – 39.

İslam M O and Begüm B. 1985. Stability of chickpea variety for sowing date in Bangladesh. International journal in agricultural science 55, 228-232.

Jagtap SS and Chan AK. 1999. Agrometeorological aspects of agriculture in the sub-humid and humid zones of Africa and Asia. Invited paper for the international workshop on agrometeorology for the 21st century. Conference Africa. Pp 1-35. http://www.agen.ufl.edu/~sjagtap/ssj/wmodoc.pdf

Katiyar  R P, Prased J, Sigh R B  and Ram K. 1977. Association analysis of grain yield and its components in segregation population of chickpea. Plant Breed. Abstract 48, 4965.

Kgasago H, Reinhardt CF, Steyn JM and Ma’ali S. 2006. Effect of planting dates and densities on yield and yield components of short and ultra-short growth period maize. M.Inst. Agrar Dissertation, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Khan I A, Bashir M and Malik B A. 1989. Character association and their implication in chickpea breeding. Pakistan Journal Agricultural Science 26, 214- 220.

Lamm FR, Aiken RM and Abou-Kheira AA. 2009. Corn yield and water use characteristics as affected by tillage, plant density, and irrigation. Am. Soc. Agriculture and Biological Engineers 52 (1), 133-143.

Love HH and Wentz JB. 1917. Correlations between ear characters and yield in corn. Agronomy Journal 7, 315-322.

Malik B A, Khan I A and Malik M R. 1988. Genetic variability and correlation among metric traits in chickpea. Pakistan Journal Agricultural Research 9, 352-354.

Modarres AM, Hamilton RI, Dijak ML, Dwyer M, Stewart DW, Mather DE and Smith DL. 1998. Plant population density effects on maize inbred lines grown in short-season environments. Crop Science 38, 104 – 108.

Nielsen  RL.  1996.  Seed  Size,  Seed  Quality  and Planter Adjustments. Purdue Extension, Purdue University. http://www.kingcorn.org/news/articles.96/

Peng B, Li Y, Wang Y, Liu C, Liu Z, Tan W, Zhang Y, Wang D, Shi Y, Sun B, Song Y, Wang T and Li Y. 2011. QTL analysis for yield components and kernel- related traits in maize across multi-environments. Theor Appl Genet 122, 1305-1320.

Rafiq M, Rafique M, Hussain A and Altaf M. 2010. Studies on the heritability, correlation and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L). Journal Agricultural Research 48, 35-38.

Ross AJ, Hallauer AR and Lee M. 2006. Genetic analysis of traits correlated with maize ear length. Maydica 51, 301-313.

Singh K B, Bejiga G and Malhotra R S. 1990. Associations of some characters with seed yield in chickpea collections. Euphytica 49, 83-88.

Tollenaar M, Dibo AA, Aguilera A, Weise SF and Swantin CJ. 1994. Effect of crop density on weed interference in maize. Agronomy Journal 86 (4), 591-595.

Related Articles

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.

Conservation and trade dynamics of non-timber forest products in local markets in south western Cameroon

Kato Samuel Namuene, Mojoko Fiona Mbella, Godswill Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, Eunice Waki, Hudjicarel Kiekeh, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 58-69, August 2025.

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.