Comparison of qualitative properties of eggs from hens reared in battery cages and free range system

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2016
Views (226) Download (5)

Comparison of qualitative properties of eggs from hens reared in battery cages and free range system

Monika Stojanova, Dragoslav Kocevski, Vlado Vukovic, Koco Porcu
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.9( 6), 77-83, December 2016.
Certificate: IJAAR 2016 [Generate Certificate]


The aim of this research was to determine the differences of some quantity properties of eggs from hens reared in two farming methods: battery cages system and free range system of rearing. Total 200 eggs were analyzed or a 100 eggs separately from both ways of hens rearing. The research was done in 2016. The eggshell strength was determined using an automated measuring device and the other parameters (egg mass, yolk color and Haugh units) were determined using the apparatus for automatically determining the internal quality of eggs. The eggs getting from battery cages system of rearing hens are characterized with higher eggshell strength compared to analyzed eggs form free ranged hens, but there is no significantly difference. Values for the mass of whole eggs are inversely with values for the eggshell strength at both methods of hens rearing. For the property yolk color, there is significantly differences between eggs from caged and free ranged laying hens (t170.800 = 6.567; p < 0.05). There is significantly differences between eggs form analyzed systems of hens lying for the parameter Haugh Units, too (t194.786 = 6.767; p < 0.05). The eggs form battery cages rearing hens are characterized with higher eggshell strength, higher values for the yolk color as well as higher Haugh units that mean better overall quality. Simultaneously, controlled way of hens rearing in battery cages systems decreases the risk of getting unsafe eggs.


Anderson KE, Tharrington JB, Curtis PA, Jones T. 2004. Shell characteristics of eggs from historic strains of single comb white leghorn chickens and the relationship off egg shape to shell strength. J. Poult. Sci. 3(1), 17- 18.

Belayavin CG, Wells RG. 1987. Egg quality  current problems and recent advances. Sevenoaks, UK: Butterworths, 69- 72.

Clerici F, Casiraghi E, Hidalgo A, Rossi M. 2006. Evaluation of eggshell quality characteristics in relation to the housing system of laying hens. XII. European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy, 98- 103 p.

Crosby TN. 1981. Food packaging materials. London: Applied Science Publishers Ltd.

Fellows P, Axel B. 1993. Appropriate food packaging. Geneva: Tool Publications for the ILO, 19- 25.

George JM, Carmen R, Parkhurst P. 1995. Poultry products technology, 3rd edition. Food product press. New York, London: an imprint to the Haworth Press, Inc, 123- 128.

Gleen,WF, Dianne P, Murianna P, Kent E, Travnicek D, Susan S. 2002. International egg pasteurization manual. England: United egg association, 29- 34.

Holland B, Unwin DI, Bus DH. 1989. Milk products and eggs. The composition of foods. Surrey, UK: Unwin Brothers Ltd, 85- 94.

Kocevski D, Nikolova N, Bunevski Gj, Dzabirski V, Vuković V, Porču K. 2015. Ouality of eggs for consumption from different producers in the markets in the Republic of Macedonia. 1: Egg  mass and egg shell strength. Maced. J. Anim. Sci., 5 (2), 63- 68 p.

Moges F, Abera M, Tadelle D. 2010. Assessment of village chicken production system and evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of local chicken ecotype in Bure district, North West Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5 (13), 1739- 1748 p.

Nys Y. 2000. Factors contributing to improvement in egg quality. Lucrări Ştiinţifice 52, Seria Zootehnie. INRA, France, 92- 95 p.

Pavlovski Z, Hopic S, Vracar S. 1994. The effect of housing system on interval egg quality traits in small layer flocks. Biotehnologija u stocarstvu, v. 10(5-6), 37- 47 p.

Pavlovski Z, Skrbic Z, Lukic M. 2004. Influence of husbandry system on the internal egg quality traits in small flocks hen layers. Zivinarstvo 39(6-7), p.19- 23.

Prabakaran R. 1998. Commercial chicken production. Chennai, India, P. Saranaya, 41- 47.

Sacharow S, Griffin RC. 1980. Principles of food packaging, 2nd edition. Westport: CT, AVI, 168- 174.

Sim SJ, Nakai S. 1994. Egg uses and processing technologies, new developments. Wallingford, UK, CAB International, 89- 96.

Stadelman WJ, Cotterill OJ. 1995. Egg science and technology, 4th edition. Food product press. New York, London: an imprint to the Haworth Press, Inc, 118- 125.