Comparison of the Quercus brantii and Pyrus glabra boiss species structure in Zagros forests (Case Study: Ghalehgol Forest, Khoramabad City, Iran)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2013
Views (391) Download (5)

Comparison of the Quercus brantii and Pyrus glabra boiss species structure in Zagros forests (Case Study: Ghalehgol Forest, Khoramabad City, Iran)

P. Farhadi, J. Soosani, V. Alijani, K. Adeli
Int. J. Biosci.3( 8), 210-217, August 2013.
Certificate: IJB 2013 [Generate Certificate]


Understanding the condition of forest species and Knowledge of the evolution of ecosystems that have the ability auto regeneration, before any plan to take a principle in stand is necessary and can serve as a good model to select the correct methods of silviculture to be considered. In this research, furthermore introduce some of Structural indices, Quercus brantii and Pyrus glabra boiss structure in Khoram abad Ghale gol region (part of Zagros forests, Iran) were studied. In this study uniform angle (UAI), mingling (DMi), crown canopy dominance (TDi) and crown canopy differentiation (Tij) indices applied to investigate of positioning, mingling and crown canopy status among neighborhoods trees. In order to calculate of mentioned indices, Crancod (ver.1.3) Software used. The average values of Uniform angle, mingling, crown canopy dominance and crown canopy differentiation indices for Quercs brantii calculated, 0.47, 0.06, 0.51 and 0.48 respectively and 0.38, 0.86, 0.56 and 0.44 for Pyrus glabra boiss respectively. The result of mingling index clearly showed the difference between Quercus brantii and Pyrus glabra boiss species. Whereas the values of UAI, TDi and Tij were approximately the same for the studied species. The values of absolute discrepancy algorithm, which employed to quantify difference between Quercus brantii and Pyrus glabra boiss species spatial structures, were 10.8%, 85.4%, 25.2% and 22.1% for UAI, DMi, TDi and Tij respectively. These indices have a high ability in precisely demonstrate of differentiation of forest stand structure in succession stages and their applicability for comparing the studied stand with others, therefore they’re useful tools for sustainable management.


Aguirre O, Hui G, Gadow K.V, Jimenez J. 2003. An analysis of forest structure using neighborhood-based variables. Forest Ecology and Management. 183, 137-145.

Alijani V, Feghhi J, Zobeiri M, Marvi Mohadjer M. 2011. Quantifying the Spatial Structure in Hyrcanian Submountain Forest (Case Study: Gorazbon District of Kheirud Forest-Noushahr-Iran) Journal of the Iranian Natural Resource. 111-125.

Alijani V, Feghhi J. 2012. Investigation on the Elm (Ulmus glabra Hudson) Spatial Structure to Applying for Sustainable Management (Case Study: Gorazbon district, Kheirud Forest). Journal of Environmental Studies. 37(60), 35-44.

Corral J.J, Wehenkel C, Castelanos H.A, Vargas B, Dieguez U. 2010. A permutation test of spatial randomness: application to nearest neighbor indices in forest stands. Journal of Forest Research. 15, 218-225.

Erfani fard S.Y, Feghhi J, Zobeiri M, Namiranian M. 2008. Investigation on the spatial pattern of trees in Zagros forests. Journal of the Iranian Natural Resource. 4, 1319-1328.

Gadow K.V, Zhang C.Y, Wehenkel C, Pommerening A, Corral-Rivas J, Korol M, Myklush S, Hui G.Y, Kiviste A, Zhao X.H. 2012. Forest structure and diversity. 29-83. In: Pukkala, T. and Gadow, K.V.

Ghomi  Avili  A,  Hosseini  S.M,  Mataji A.A, Jalali S, GH A. 2007. Biodiversity of woody species in different soils of two plant associations. Iranian Journal of Biology. 2, 200-206.

Graz P.F. 2004. The behavior of the species mingling index Msp in relation to species dominance and dispersion. European Journal of Forest Research. 123, 87-92.

Jazirehi  M.H,  Ebrahimi  Rostaghi  M.  2003. Silviculture  in  Zagros.  University  of  Tehran  Press. 560 p.

Kint V. 2005. Structural development in ageing temperate Scots pine stands. Forest ecology and Management. 214, 237-250.

Kint V, Van Meirvenne M, Nachtergale L, Geudens G, Lust N. 2003. Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparision between nearest neighbor indices and variogram analysis. Forest Science. 49, 36-49.

Kint V, Lust N, Ferris R, Olsthoorn A.F.M. 2000. Quantification of forest stand structure applied to Scots Pine (Pinus Sylvestris L.) Forests. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 1, 147-163.

Kint V, Wulf Robert D, Noel L. 2004. Evaluation of sampling methods for the estimation of structural indices in forest stands. Ecological Modeling. 180, 461-476.

Marvie Mohadjer M.R. 2006. Silviculture. Tehran Universiyu Press. 387 p.

Memarian F, Tabbary M, Hosseini S.M, Banj Shafiee A. 2007. A comparison between biodiversity in needle leaf mixed stand with broad leaf mixed stand in Kalardasht. Journal of Environmental Studies. 42, 103-108.

Motz K, Sterba H, Pommerening A. 2010. Sampling measures of tree diversity. Forest Ecology and Management. 260, 1985-1996.

Nuro aldini S, Eslam bonyad A, Por shakori F. 2012. Classification of the forest canopy on aerial photographs using histological analysis (case study: forest Taf Lorestan). Iranian Remote Sensing & GIS. 3, 33-46

Pommerening A. 2002. Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry. 3, 305-324.

Pommerening A, Stoyan D. 2006. Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 36, 1723-1739.

Ruprecht H, Dhar A, Aigner B, Oitzinger G, Raphael K, Vacik H. 2010. Structural diversity of English yew (Taxus bacata L.) populations. European Journal of Forest Research. 129, 189-198.

Soosani J. 2008.visualization and monitoring of forest cover changes in zagros (case study: Kakareza forest in khoramabad city), Ph.D. thesis, University of Tehran.

Zobeiri M. 2007. Forest biometry. University of Tehran. 405p.