home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Comparison on allowable use of Atriplex leucoclada in Khalij-O-Omani rangelands of Iran

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2014
Views (436) Download (17)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparison on allowable use of Atriplex leucoclada in Khalij-O-Omani rangelands of Iran

Farhang Ghasriani, Ali Mohebby, Ehasan Zandi Esfahan
J. Bio. Env. Sci.4( 1), 47-53, January 2014.
Certificate: JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Allowable useAtriplex leucocladaForage productionKhalij-O-Omani region

Abstract

Current research was performed in the selected sites of Khalij-O-Omani vegetative region including Kabkan (Boshehr), Beris (Sistan and Balochestan). Atriplex leucoclada is a key and palatable species, having a considerable portion in rangelands production. For this purpose, 40 similar species of Atriplex leucoclada were selected in each site. Selected species were exposed to different harvesting intensities of 25, 50 and 75% and 0% as control group. Data were analyzed by SPSS and MSTATC, and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used for mean comparisons. According to the results, no significant differences were recorded for the harvesting intensities of 25 and 50 % in terms of studied traits but the harvesting intensity of 75% negatively affected Atriplex leucoclada. Consequently, a harvesting intensity of 25% is recommended as the best allowable use of Atriplex leucoclada for this vegetative region and other similar regions.

VIEWS 13
Cover PDF

Akbarinia A. 2003. Determining the allowable use of Bromus tomentellus in semi-steppe region of Ghazvin province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research 7, 333-345.

Amiri F. 2007.Multipurpose model for rangeland by using GIS (case study: GharaaghaghSemirom catchment). Ph.D. thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Arzani H. 2009. Range Analysis (M.Sc. Booklet), Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran.

BeetleA.A, JohnsonW.M, LangR.L, MayM, SmithD.R. 2002. Effect of grazing intensity on cattle weights and vegetation at the Bighorn Experimental Pastures.University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 373. Laramie, Wyoming.

Cook CW . 1977. Effects of season and intensity of use on desert vegetation. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Bulletin 483 -Reprinted March 1977.

Fazilati A, Hosseini Araghi H. 1965. Country rangelands and management, adjustment and reclamation methods of it, Range engineering office press.

Forward J.R, Magai M.M. 1992. Cipping frequency and intensity effects on big bluestem yield, quality, and persistence. Journal of Range management 45(6).

Fulstone F. 2009. Annual operating instruction in Missouri flat allotment for the 2009 grazing season. United States Department of Aagriculture, Forest Services, Humboldt-Toiyabe national forest, file code: 2210.

Ganskopp D. 1988. Defoliation of Thurber needlegrass: herbage and root responses, Journal of Rangemanagement 41(6).

GasriianiF,  Mohebby  A, Zandi  Esfahan  E. 2013. Determination of allowable use for Stipa hohenackerian in semi-steppe rangelands of Iran. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 3(6), 1-7.

Gasriiani F, Najibzadeh M . 2012 .Study on the allowable use of important range species in Sahand-East Azarbaijane Province, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Ghaemi MT. 2001. Autecology of Atriplex verrucifera in West Azarbaijane Province. Final repor of project. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Gharedaghi H, Fazel Najafaabadi M. 2000. Seasonal changes in carbohydrate reserves in the key plants of Polour area. The second national range and rangelands management conference, Tehran, 16-18.

Kohandel A, Chaichi M, Arzani H, MohsenieSaravi M , Zahedi GH. 2005. Effect of different grazing intensities on plant cover composition, and on moisture content, mechanical resistanceand infiltration rate of the soils, Savojbolaghrangelands. Journal of the Iranian Natural Resources 59 (4), 1001-1011.

Mesdaghi M. 2003. Range Management in Iran, Astane Ghodse Razavi. 330.

Moghaddam MR. 1998. Range and Range Management, University of Tehran, 470.

Hodgkinson KC. 1980. Frequency and extend of defoliation of herbaceous plants by sheep in foothill range community in Northern Utha. Journal of Range management 33 (3).

Holechek JL, Cole R, Fisher J, Valdez R. 2003. Natural resources, ecology, economic and policy. Rangelands 26, 118-223.

Leyshon A. J, Campbell C.A. 1992. Effect of timing and intensity of first defoliation on subsequent production of 4 pasture species . Journal of Range management 45(4).

Motazedian I, Sharrow S.H. 1990. Defoliation frequency and intensity effects on pasture forage quality. Journal of range management 43 (3).

Reece PE, Alexander JD, Johnson JR. 2001. Drought management on range and pastureland, a handbook for Nebraska and South Dakota, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Sanadghol A, Moghaddam MR. 2001. The effects of grazing systems and grazing intensities on standing crop and forage intake in Bromus tomentellus pasture. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi 64, 30-35.

Smith MV. 2oo7. Effect of stocking rate and grazing management on the persistence and production on dry land on deep sands. Proc. Int. Grassland Cong. 9, 624-628.

Smith L, Ruyle G, Maynard J, Barker S. 2007. Principles of obtaining andinterpreting utilization data on rangelands, The University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.

Tate K, Gillen W, Michell R. Steven R. 1994. Effect  of  defoliation  intensity  on  regrowth  of tallgrass  prairie. Journal  of   Range management47(1).

Zhang XQ, Liu J, Welham CVJ, Liu CC, Li DN, Chen L, Wang RQ. 2006. The  effects  of clonal integration on morphological plasticity and placement  of  daughter  ramets  in  black  locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Flora 7,547-554.

Zhao W, Chen SP, Lin GH. 2007. Compensatory growth responses to clipping defoliation in Leymus chinensis  (Poaceae(  under  nutrient  addition  and water  deficiency  conditions.  Plant  Ecology  DOI10.1007/s11258-007-9336-3.

Submit Manuscript