Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | July 1, 2013

| Download 4

Competition of nine wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars against Melilotus alba

Danial Ghanbary, Mohammad Rezvani

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.3( 7), 107-113, July 2013

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.7.107-113


IJB 2013 [Generate Certificate]


Ranking of crop cultivars competitiveness against the weeds could be an effective strategy in weed management that resulted in increased our knowledge about the crop ability to suppression of weeds. A field experiment was conducted at Qrakhyl Agronomy Research Station, Iran, to evaluate 9 wheat cultivars competitiveness against Melitotus alba. Wheat cultivars including Morvarid, Darya, Nai 60, Milan, N-85-5, N-87-4, N-86-7, N-80-19 and Shanghai planted in both presence and absence of M. alba in split plot design with four replicates. Competition reduced height, tiller number, grain and biological yield of cultivars. Wheat cultivars showed variations in response to competition. Morvarid cultivar was more successful in reducing M. alba biomass. A significant correlation was found between wheat height and weed biomass. Morvarid and Nai60 had the maximum competition index that representing higher ability of the cultivars to inhibit M. alba than other ones. Grain yield of wheat cultivars positively correlated with the ability to withstand competition (AWC). The wheat cultivars revealed variations in tolerance to competition.


Copyright © 2013
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Competition of nine wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars against Melilotus alba

Aminpanah H, Firouzi S, Abbasian A. 2013. Competitive ability of canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.) against their natural weed populations. International Journal of Biosciences 3, 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.3.121-128

Aminpanah H. 2012. Competition between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.) or rice barnyard grass (Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing.). Romanian Agricultural Research 29, 395-403.

Barberi  P. 2002.  Weed  management  in  organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issue? Weed Research 42, 177–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2002.00277

Blackshaw RE. 1994. Differential Competitive Ability of Winter Wheat Cultivars against Downy Brome. Agronomy Journal 86, 649-654.

Challaiah RE, Burnside OC, Wicks GA, Johnson VA. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Science 34, 689-693.

Christensen S. 1994. Crops weed competition and herbicide performance in cereal species and varieties. Weed Research 34, 29–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1994.tb01970

Cousens RD, Rebetzke GJ, Barnett AG. 2003. Dynamics of Competition between Wheat and Oat. Agronomy Journal 95, 1305-1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1305

Drews S, Neuhoff D, Kopke U. 2009. Weed suppression ability of three winter wheat varieties at different row spacing under organic farming conditions. Weed Research 49, 526-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00720

Dhima   K,   Vasilakoglou   I,    Lithourgidis    A, Mecolari E, Keco R, Agolli X, Horinos E. 2008. Phytotoxicity of 10 winter barley varieties and their competitive ability against common poppy and ivy-leaved Speedwell. Experimental Agriculture 44, 385-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S001447970800639

Dingkuhn M, Johnson DE, Sow A, Audebert AY. 1999. Relationships between upland rice characteristics and weed competitiveness. Field Crops Research 61, 79–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00152

Korres NE, Froud-Williams RJ. 2002. Effects of winter wheat cultivars and seed rate on the biological characteristics of naturally occurring weed flora. Weed Research 42, 417-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2002.00302

Liebman M, Davis AS. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low external-input farming systems. Weed Research 40, 27–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00164

Lemerle D, Gill GS, Murphy CE, Walker SR, Cousens RD, Makhtari S, Peltzer SJ, Coleman R, Lickett DJ. 2001a. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 527–548.

Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Orchard B. 2001b. Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum. Weed Research 41, 197–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2001.00232

Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Coombe SN. 1995. Losses in grain yield in winter crops from Lolium rigidium L. competition against weeds. Weed Research 35, 503-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1995.tb01648

Mennan H, Zandstra BH. 2005. Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum)  cultivars  and  seeding  rate  on yield loss from Galium aparine (cleavers). Crop Protection 24, 1061–1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.02.012

Paolini R, Faustini F, Saccardo F, Crino P. 2006. Competitive interactions between chickpea genotypes and weeds. Weed Research 46, 335–344.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00513

Powles SB, Preston C, Bryan IB, Jutsum AR. 1997. Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Advances in Agronomy 58, 57–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60253-9

Rezvani M, Zaefarian F, Joveini M. 2013. Weed suppression ability of six soybean [Glycine max (L.) MERR.] varieties under natural weed development conditions. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 61, 43–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.61.2013.1.5

Rezvani M, Zaefarian F, Joveini M. 2010. Response of canopy structure of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivars to weed competition. Iranian Journal of Weed Science. 6, 91-105. (In Persian with English Abstract).

Seavers GP, Wright KJ. 1999. Crop canopy development and structure influence weed suppression. Weed Research 39, 319-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.1999.00148

Watson PR, Derksen DA, Van Acker RC. 2006. The ability of 29 barley cultivars to compete and withstand competition. Weed Science 54, 783–792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-020R3.1