Composition of milk- A comparative analysis between indigenous and cross breed cows of Ganjam

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2020
Views (791)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Composition of milk- A comparative analysis between indigenous and cross breed cows of Ganjam

Puspanjali Maharana, Gitanjali Mishra
Int. J. Biosci. 17(1), 216-215, July 2020.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2020; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was carried out in Berhampur city of Ganjam District from 03.10.2018 to 02.12.2018 to estimate the composition of milk in Cross breed and Indigenous breed cows. Twenty dairy cows with a standard body weight between 250 kg to 350 kg, 3rd to 7th lactation period and 5-7 years of age were taken for the study. Total Protein was determined by Nano spectrophotometer, Total Carbohydrates were determined by anthrone techniques, Acidity were determined by IS: 1479-1 (1960) and total casein was determined by Acid precipitation. Concerning the milk components, Cross Breed groups shows a significant variation (P< 0.05) attributed to type of feed and breed. The statistical analysis showed a significant increase (P<0.05) in protein, ASH and SNF percentage as compare to Indigenous breed. Total solid and Moisture of IB and CB groups has Non-significant increase (P< 0.5) in Cross Breed as compare to Indigenous breed. Fat content shows a Non-significant increase (P< 0.5) in cross breed cows than the Indigenous breed cows. Acidity% found highly significant (P<0.0001) in both breed of cows. Lactose content found a Non-significant increase in indigenous breed cows as compare to the cross breed cows (P<0.5). Lactometer reading shows significant increase (P<0.01) in Cross breed group of cows as compare to Indigenous breed cows. Specific Gravity found a Non-significant increase (P<0.1) in cross breed cows. Total Casein content found highly significant in cross breed cows (P<0.001).

Ageeb AG, Hayes JF. 2000. Genetic and environmental effects on the productivity of Holstein Friesian cattle to the climatic conditions of central Sudan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod 32, 33-49.

AOAC. 2000. Association of analytical chemist. Official methods of analysis, 1-24

Butler G, Stergiadis S, Chatzidimitriou E, Franceschin E,  Davis HR, Leifert C, Håvard Steinshamn H. 2019. Differing responses in milk composition from introducing rapeseed and naked oats to conventional and organic dairy diets. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 8115. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44567-8

Castillo AR. 2007. Improving nitrogen utilization on dairy cows. M.sc thesis, University of Reading (UK).

Castle H, Watkin J. 1979. Compositional on Milk and study of its different enzymes 11, 1215-1218.

Dandare SU, Ezeonwumelu LJ, Abubakar MG. 2014. Comparative analysis of nutrient composition of milk from different breeds of cows. ISSN:2278-0041. European Journal of Applied Engineering and Scientific Research 3(2), 33-36.

Darwish S. 2009. Factors Affecting milk production Agricultural Report-www.reefnet.gov

Eckles CH, Combs WB and Macy H. 1957. Milk and milk products. 4th Edn. McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc., NY, USA, pt 12, 988-112.

Guetouache M, Guessas B, Medjekal S. 2014. Composition and Nutritional value of raw milk, ISSN 2350-1588.Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research Vol. (2), pp. 115-122.

Jones AC, King GJG, Fennell H, Stone D. 1957. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth. Lab. Serv pp. 16, 109.

Kanwal R, Ahmed P and Mirza B. 2004. Comparative analysis of quality of milk collected from Buffalo, Cow, Goat and Sheep of Ralwalpindi/Islambad region in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Plant science, 3 (3): 300-305.

Kennedy J, Dillon P, Delaby L, Faverdin P, Stakelum G, Rath M. 2003. Effect of genetic merit and concentrate supplementation on grass intake and milk production with Holstein Friesian Dairy cows. Journal of Dairy science 86(2), 610-621.

Kohler G. 2013. Note d’information relative à la ventedirecte de lait cru. Projet des Pyrénées. Atlantiques: pp. 1-4.

Konte M. 1999. Le laitet les produitslaitiers. Développement de systèmes de productions intensives en Afrique de l’ouest. Université de Nouakchott (R.I.M) Faculté des Sciences et Technologies des aliments, B. P. 5026. ISRA/URV – LNERV/FEVRIER: 2-25.

Marphes AM. 1964. Milk Production. Ecosystem of the World Billiton 17(86), 101-112.

Palmquist DL, Denise Beaulieu A, Barbano DM. 1993. Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. Feed and Animal factors influencing milk fat composition journal of dairy science 76(6), 1753-1771.

Roadhouse CL, Henderson JL. 1950. The Market Milk Industry. 2nd Edn., Magraw Hill Brok Co., New York pp: 41-42.

Schmidst G,H., Robinson, R.K. and Kenneth, R, 1988. Food microbiology/dairy products.  Principles of Dairy Science, Second Edition.

Related Articles

Using geoinformatics to reduce cultural extinction, language and cultural identity crises, diasppearing cultural landscapes and cultural heritage loss among the Igbos of Southeast, Nigeria

B. N. Igbokwe, N. F. Nwulu*, F. U. Nnamani, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, M. A. C. Osuji, K. U. Chukwu, N. Emeka-Duru, G. O. Mbarah, C. F. Obumneke, F. O. Egwim, C. F. Nlemchukwu, C. M. Okwara, C. R. Ayozie, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 141-154, June 2026.

Eco-linguistics strategies for promoting rural literacy among farming households and farm families in Southeast, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu*, F. U. Nnamani, C. R. Ayozie, C. F. Obumneke, B. N. Igbokwe, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, M. A. C. Osuji, F. O. Egwim, K. U. Chukwu, G. O. Mbarah, N. Emeka-Duru, C. F. Nlemchukwu, C. M. Okwara, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 128-140, June 2026.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of some plant extracts against cowpea charcoal rot

Manan Djamila Baikoro*, Dianyagou Paul Ouali, Wendoléan Romain Soalla, Pawindé Elisabeth Zida, Bouma James Neya, Marie Laure Guissou, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 118-127, June 2026.

Physicochemical profiling and quality evaluation of commercial mustard oils brands in Bangladesh: Indicators of stability and consumer safety

Umme Salma Nahida, Md. Al-Amin Mia, Afroza Bashar*, Tauhida Tasnim, Marjina Akter, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 108-117, June 2026.

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.