Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and its components in Dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica Fish. et Mey.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2014
Views (889)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and its components in Dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica Fish. et Mey.)

Parisa Aghaei-Gharachorlou, Safar Nasrollahzadeh, Jalil Shafag-Kolvanagh
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(4), 157-163, April 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The associations of yield and its components offer important information in breeding plants. A study was conducted at the experimental field of the Research Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran in 2012, on Dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica Fish. et Mey.), to determine the association of yield and its components. The association was analyzed by correlation coefficient, and further subjected by path coefficient analysis to estimate direct and indirect effects of each character on seed yield. Plant characters such as biological yield, harvest index, grain per plant, capsule number, number of grain per capsule, lateral stem and 1000 grain weight were main selected measurements for the data analysis. Positive and significant correlation were found between the biological yield and seed yield (0.985**). Stepwise multiple linear regression interpretation also indicated that maximum of variation in seed yield attributed to variation which arose from harvest index and biological yield. The results of path analysis strongly suggested that biological yield and harvest index contain positive direct effect on seed yield. Based on the results of this experiment, the importance of harvest index and biological yield can be seen for selection, in breeding programs, with the goal of improved Dragon’s head seed yield under the semiarid conditions.

Acharya S, Dhaduk LK, Maliwal GL. 1994. Path analysis in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under conserved moisture conditions. University Research Journal 20: 154- 157.

Akanda C, Mundi T. 1996. Path coefficient analysis of the effects of stripe rust and cultivar mixtures on yield and yield components of winter wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 666- 672.

Arshad M, Bakhsh A, Ghafoor A. 2004. Path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 36: 75- 81.

Aytac S, Esendal E. 1966. An investigation on yield and some yield components of potato cultivars grown surroundings Samsun Ondokuz mayis University. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 11: 197- 208.

Burhan A. 2007. Relationship among yield and some yield characters in potato. Journal of Biology Science 7: 973- 976. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ jbs.2007.973.976

De-Bruin J, Pedersen P. 2009. Growth, yield and yield component changes among old and new soybean cultivars. Agronomy Journal 101: 124– 130. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0187

Dewey DR, Lu K. 1959. A correlation and path analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal 51: 515- 518. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.515.518

Dokuyucu T, Akkaya A. 1999. Path Coefficient Analysis and Correlation of Grain Yield and Yield Components of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes. Rachis Newsletters 18: 17- 20.

Faisal M, Malik N, Ashraf M, Qureshi AS, Ghafoor A. 2007. Assessment of genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and its components in soybean. Pakistan Journal of Botany 39: 405- 413.

Golkar P, Arzani A, Rezaei AM. 2011. Determining relationships among seed yield, yield components and Morpho-phenological traits using multivariate analyses in safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.). Annals of Biological Research 2: 162- 169.

Hedrick UP. 1972. Sturtevant’s Edible Plants of the World. Dover Publications, New York.

Ion V, Basa AG, Sandoiu DI, Obrisca M. 2011. Results regarding biological characteristics of the species Lallemantia iberica in the specific conditions from south Romania. Bucharest, Series A, 275- 280.

Ivanovic M, Rosie K. 1985. Path coefficient analysis for three stalk traits and grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 30: 233- 239.

Kara SM, Esendal E. 1996. Correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components in Turkish tobaccos. Tobecco Research 22: 101- 104.

Koauychai P, Sereeprasert V, Soonsuwon W, Eksomtramage T. 2001. Path analysis of baby corn yield. Songklanakarin Journal of Science Technology 3: 29- 33.

Lee JI, Kwon BS, and Kim LH. 1977. The relationships between the characters and the influence of each character on the yield of rape, correlation coefficients, path coefficients and heritability. Korean Journal of Breed 9: 58- 64.

Lorencetti C, Carvalho F, Oliveira A, Valerio I, Hartwig I, Benin G, Schmidt D. 2006. Applicability of Phenotypic and Canonic Correlations and Path Coefficients in the Selection of Oat Genotypes. Science Agriculture 63: 11- 19.

Mokhtassi B, Akbari G, Mirhadi M, Zand E, and Soufizadeh S. 2006. Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phonological traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Euphytica 148: 261-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-9019-x

Musaana MS, Nahdy MS. 1998. Path coefficient analysis of yield and its components in pigeon pea. African Crop Science Journal 6: 143- 148.

Naghibi A. 1999. Seed oil rich in linoleic acid as renewable feed stock for environment friendly cross linkers in powder coating. Indian Crop Production 11: 157- 165.

Nie Z, Chen FT, Shi XC. 1993. Path analysis of character related to seed yield in safflower. Oil Crop of China 3: 26- 29.

Omidi T. 2000. Correlation between traits and path analysis for grain and oil yield in spring safflower. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter 15: 78- 83.

Rodriguez D, Angulo-Sanchez L, Rodriguez-Garcia, R. 2001. Correlation and Path Coefficient Analyses of the Agronomic Trait of A Native Population of Guayule Plants. Industrial Crops and Products 14: 93- 103.

Samonte S, Wilson L, McClu A. 1998. Path analyses of yield and yield-related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Science 38: 1130- 1136.

Serivichayaswadi P, Sirasoontorn S, Chatwachirawong P. 1997. Yield and yield components relationship in sugarcane. Kasetsart Journal 31: 20- 27.

Surek H, and Beser N. 2003. Correlation and path coefficientanalysis for some yield-related traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under thrace conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 27: 77- 83.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics. California State University, Northridge, 709- 712.

Ursu B, Borcean I. 2012. Researches concerning the sowing technology at Lallemantia iberica. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 44: 168- 171.

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.