Crop management practices for better maize production in mountainous areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2021
Views (1112)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Crop management practices for better maize production in mountainous areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Ikramul Haq, Karim Ullah, Khalid Nawab, Rahmat Ullah, Kashif Shehzad
Int. J. Biosci. 19(5), 93-99, November 2021.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2021; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Crop management practices and the technical efficiency of farmers can lead to a rise the crop productivity. Extension Field Staff (EFS) were performing different management practices for maize crops to enhance their yield; thus, a study was carried out in Dir Upper, one of the mountainous districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, to find out the role of EFS in using different crop management practices. A validated interview schedule was used to collect the primary data. While applying multistage sampling, four union councils were selected, in which one village from each union council was selected for the collection of primary data. The results show that majority of the respondents were in the middle age group (26-35 years), whereas most of them were literate. The main source of income for the farming community was agriculture, as most of them were the owner of their land and cultivating maize as their major crop. The majority of farmers were in contact with EFS and satisfied with the Extension department. Applying t-test on the production of maize crop, a highly significant difference (P = 0.00) occurs showing that the yield is increased significantly after the application of management practices. They were applying ranking system on different management practices animal wastes and feeding management ranked 1st which followed by irrigation management and vice versa. By applying different management practices, the yield of maize has increased significantly compared to the last few years. Some of the farmers lacked management practices, so they needed training and that would be possible if the government built offices nearby.

Awe GO, Abegunrin TP. 2017.  Land Preparation Practices for Maize Production, Short Term Effects on Some Hydro-Physical Properties of Analfisol and Crop Performance. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 25(7), 1420-1430. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2017.1420.1430

Boddy D. 2017. Management – An Introduction (7th edition). Harlow: Pearson Education p 11.

Enyisi IS, Umoh VJ, Whong CMZ, Alabi O, Abdullahi IO. 2014. Chemical and nutritional values of maize and maize products obtained from selected markets in Kaduna. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences 11(2), 2106-2113.

FAO. 1985. Report of an export consultation on agriculture ext. and research linkages in the near East, Aman, Jordan. 22-26 July, Rome, Itlay.

Government of Pakistan. 2019. Economic survey of Pakistan. Agriculture Ministry of Finance. Important Crops p 50. http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/Chapter-02-Agriculture.pdf

Harris DR, Fuller DQ. 2014. Agriculture: definition and overview. Encyclopedia of global archaeology, 104-113. Retrieved on 21/8/2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_64

Web Access. 2020. Production. Retrieved on 23.9.2020 https://knoema.com/atlas/World/topics/Agriculture/Crops-Production-Quantity-tonnes/Maize-

Montana PJ, Charnov BH. 2008. Management. New York. Barron’s Educational Series. Inc. Pg, 333.

PalaciosRojas N, McCulley L, Kaeppler, Titcomb TJ, Gunaratna NS, LopezRidaura S, Tanumihardjo SA. 2020. Mining maize diversity and improving its nutritional aspects within agro‐food systems. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 19(4), 1809-1834. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12552

Liaqat W, Akmal M, Ali J. 2018. Sowing date effect on production of high yielding maize varieties. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 34(1), 102-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2018/34.1.102.113

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.