Cross sectional study on the nonnutritive sweetener consumption and its association with socio-demographic characteristics among Saudi pregnant women
Paper Details
Cross sectional study on the nonnutritive sweetener consumption and its association with socio-demographic characteristics among Saudi pregnant women
Abstract
The nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) were manufactured as food additive to deliver sweetness without the allied high caloric content of sugar. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to explore the preference of NNS and its connotation with socio-demographic characteristics among Saudi pregnant women. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire. Chi-square test was used to observe the association between categorical variables. A total of 327 pregnant women were recruited. Only 8% of the women reported to have gestational diabetes. Almost 67% of participants preferred normal sugar over NNS, and >50% who consume NNS preferred stevia over others. Almost 35% of the participants who do not consume NNS believed that it is abnormal and have unsafe chemical components. Reduced calories (37.21%), followed by useful for diabetics (20.93%) are the two significant reasons reported by the participants behind its consumption. An association has been found between the consumption of NNS, a package of sweetened refreshments, low-calorie juices, or artificially sweetened tea and education and income. The frequency of white sugar as a sweetening option is high among the pregnant women. These outcomes engender the requisite for further investigation to examine the usefulness of nutritional advice among pregnant women attending maternal clinics.
Alfadhli EM, Osman EN, Basri TH, Mansuri NS, Youssef MH, Assaaedi SA, Aljohani, B.A. 2015. Gestational diabetes among Saudi Women: Prevalence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Ann Saudi Med 35(3), 222–30.
Al-Hasan MM, Al-Qudsi F. 2020. Commercial artificial sweeteners might affect pregnant and nursing mice mammary gland. A histological study. J Biosci Med 8 (12), 95–108.
Al-Qudsi FM, Al-Hasan MM. 2019. In utero exposure to commercial artificial sweeteners affects mice development and mammary gland structure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26(5), 5054–64. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3935-5
Alsaedi SA, Altalhi AA, Nabrawi MF, Aldainy AA, Wali RM. 2020. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant patients visiting National Guard Primary Health care centers in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 41(2), 144–50. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2020.2.24842
Azad MB, Sharma AK, de Souza RJ, Dolinsky VW, Becker AB, Mandhane PJ, Turvey SE, Subbarao P, Lefebvre DL, Sears MR, Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development Study Investigators. 2016. Association between artificially sweetened beverage consumption during pregnancy and infant body mass index. JAMA Pediatr 170(7), 662–70. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0301
Bailey CJ, Day C, Knapper JME, Turner SL, Flatt, PR. 1997. Anti hyperglycaemic effect of saccharin in diabetic ob/ob mice. Br J Pharmacol 120(1), 74–8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0700871
Chattopadhyay S, Raychaudhuri U, Chakraborty R. 2014. Artificial sweeteners—A Review. J Food Sci Technol 51(4), 611–21. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-011-0571-1
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2015. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC (Internet). Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Available online: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/ (accessed on: 30-05-23)
Drewnowski A, Rehm CD. 2015. Socio-demographic correlates and trends in low-calorie sweetener use among adults in the United States from 1999 to 2008. Eur J Clin Nutr 69(9), 1035–41. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.38
Erkucuk A, Akgun IH, Yesil-Celiktas O. 2009. Supercritical CO2 extraction of glycosides from stevia rebaudiana leaves: Identification and optimization. J Supercrit Fluids 51(1), 29–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2009.07.002
Fitch C, Keim KS. 2012. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners. J Acad Nutr Diet 112(5), 739–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.009
Garland EM, Shapiro R, Wehner JM, Johnson LS, Mattson BJ, Khachab M, Asamoto M, Cohen SM. 1993. Effects of dietary iron and folate supplementation on the physiological changes produced in weaning rats by sodium saccharin exposure. Food Chem Toxicol 31(10), 689–99. DOI: 10.1016/0278-6915(93)90139-p
Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Fernandez-Barres S, Kleinman K, Taveras EM, Oken E. 2017. Beverage intake during pregnancy and childhood adiposity. Pediatrics 140(2), e20170031. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-0031
Gosadi II, Alamri AK, Saleh RA, Almutairi BA, Batais MA, Alamri NK. 2020. Preference of sweeteners among Saudi diabetes patients from a tertiary health care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci 27(3), 947–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.01.022
Hanin SMA, Priya VV, Gayathri, R. 2018. Awareness of health effects of aspartame among diabetic patients. Drug Invent Today 10(7), 1063-66.
Herring SJ, Oken E. 2011. Obesity and diabetes in mothers and their children: Can we stop the intergenerational cycle? Curr Diab Rep 11(1), 20–27. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-010-0156-9
Horvath K, Koch K, Jeitler K, Bender R, Bastian H, Lange S, Siebenhofer A. 2010. Effects of treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 340, c1395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1395
Jadapalli M, Somavarapu S. 2018. A Survey on perception of food labels among the population of Nellore District. Am J Food Sci Nutr 5(1), 1–16.
Maslova E, Strøm M, Olsen SF, Halldorsson TI. 2013. Consumption of artificially sweetened soft drinks in pregnancy and risk of child asthma and allergic rhinitis. PLOS ONE 8(2), e57261.
Miller PE, Perez V. 2014. Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 100(3), 765-77. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.082826
Mohamed BA, Almajwal AM, Saeed AA, Bani IA. 2013. Dietary practices among patients with type 2 diabetes in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Food Agric Environ 11(2), 110-14.
Mourad IM, Noor NA. 2011. Aspartame (a widely used artificial sweetener) and oxidative stress in the rat cerebral cortex. Int J Pharm Biomed Sci 2(1), 4–10.
Mullie P, Aerenhouts D, Clarys P. 2012. Demographic, socioeconomic and nutritional determinants of daily versus non-daily sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption. Eur J Clin Nutr 66(2), 150–55. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.138
Ota A, Kakehashi A, Toyoda F, Kinoshita N, Shinmura M, Takano H, Obata H, Matsumoto T, Tsuji J, Dobashi Y, Fujimoto WY, Kawakami M, Kanazawa Y. 2013. Effects of long-term treatment with ranirestat, a potent aldose reductase inhibitor, on diabetic cataract and neuropathy in spontaneously diabetic Torii rats. J Diabetes Res 2013,175901. DOI: 10.1155/2013/175901
Phelan S, Lang W, Jordan D, Wing RR. 2009. Use of artificial sweeteners and fat-modified foods in weight loss maintainers and always-normal weight individuals. Int J Obes 33(10), 1183–90. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.147
Pope E, Koren G, Bozzo P. 2014. Sugar substitutes during pregnancy. Can Fam Phys 60(11), 1003–05.
Schaninger CM, Sciglimpaglia D. 1981. The influence of cognitive personality traits and demographics on consumer information acquisition. J Con Res. 8(2), 208–16
Sedová L, Seda O, Kazdová L, Chylíková B, Hamet P, Tremblay J, Kren V, Krenová D. 2007. Sucrose feeding during pregnancy and lactation elicits distinct metabolic response in offspring of an inbred genetic model of metabolic syndrome. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292(5), e1318–24.
Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, Zilberman-Schapira G, Thaiss CA, Maza O, Israeli, D, Zmora N, Gilad S, Weinberger A, Kuperman Y, Harmelin A, Kolodkin-Gal I, Shapiro H, Halpern Z, Segal E, Elinav E. 2014. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut micro biota. Nature 514,181–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13793
Sylvetsky AC, Jin Y, Clark EJ, Welsh JA, Rother KI, Talegawkar SA. 2017. Consumption of low-calorie sweeteners among children and adults in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet 117(3), 441–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.004
Sylvetsky AC, Rother KI. 2018. Nonnutritive sweeteners in weight management and chronic disease: A Review. Obesity (Silver Spring) 26 (4), 635–40. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22139
Wahabi H, Fayed A, Esmaeil S, Alzeidan R, Elawad M, Tabassum R, Hansoti S, Magzoup ME, Al-Kadri H, Elsherif E, Al-Mandil H, Al-Shaikh G, Zakaria N. 2016. Riyadh mother and baby multicenter cohort study: The cohort profile. PLOS ONE 11(3), e0150297. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150297
World Health Organization (WHO) (Guideline). 2015. Sugars Intake for Adults and Children WHO: Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/sugars_intake/en/ (accessed on:03-06-23)
Zhu Y, Olsen SF, Mendola P, Halldorsson TI, Rawal S, Hinkle SN, Yeung EH, Chavarro JE, Grunnet LG, Granström C, Bjerregaard AA, Hu FB, Zhang C. 2017. Maternal consumption of artificially sweetened beverages during pregnancy, and offspring growth through 7 years of age: A prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 46(5), 1499–1508. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx095
Manal Abdulaziz Binobead, Areej Mulfi Alotaibi, Shaista Arzoo, Laila Naif Al-Harbi, Sahar Abdulaziz Alsedairy, Maha A Al-juwayd (2024), Cross sectional study on the nonnutritive sweetener consumption and its association with socio-demographic characteristics among Saudi pregnant women; IJB, V24, N1, January, P132-142
https://innspub.net/cross-sectional-study-on-the-nonnutritive-sweetener-consumption-and-its-association-with-socio-demographic-characteristics-among-saudi-pregnant-women/
Copyright © 2024
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0