Describing shell shapes of Venerid bivalves using elliptic fourier analysis
Paper Details
Describing shell shapes of Venerid bivalves using elliptic fourier analysis
Abstract
In this study, Elliptic Fourier (EF) analysis was used to describe phenotypic variation among the selected venerid bivalve species Meretrix lyrata (lyrate asiatic hard clam), Chamelea striatula (striped venus clam) and Tapes dorsatus (turgid venus clam). Thus, to describe possible phenotypic diversity, a total of 90 venerid bivalves (30 specimens for each species) were photographed on their right valves. Canonical variate analysis (CVA), multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests showed significant difference between species based on the Fourier coefficients. This study showed significant variations in the shape of the right external valve of the shell. CVA plot generated show separation of populations examined indicating significant difference between groups. Observed differences in the external shell shapes of different venerid bivalve species were based in the umbo, anterior margin, shell width, length depth and anterior margin depression. Results suggest hypothesized variable factors behind the disparity of the external shell shape which include habitat differences, environment and genotype interactions. Herewith, the use of Elliptic Fourier (EF) analysis proved to be useful in effective quantification of inter-specific variation between species.
Camama CG, Torres MAJ, Manting MME, Gorospe JJ, Demayo CG. 2014. Landmark-based geometric analysis in describing the shell of the freshwater gastropod Vivipara angularis (Gastropoda: Viviparidae) from Lake Dapao, Pualas, Lanao del Sur, Mindanao, Philippines. Advances in Environmental Sciences 6, 44-54.
Chen J, Li Q, Kong L, Zheng X. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of Venus clams (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Veneridae) with emphasis on the systematic position of taxa along the coast of mainland China. Zoologica Scripta 40, 260-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2011.00471.x
Coan EV, Valentich-Scott P, Bernard FR. 2000. Marine Bivalve mollusks from Arctic Alaska to Baja California. Santa Barbara Natural History Museum, Santa Barbara, California 8, 76.
Dapar ML, Garcia SM, Achacoso MV, Debalucos CA, Moneva CS, Demayo CG. 2014. Describing Populations of Pomacea canaliculata Lamarck from Selected Areas in Mindanao, Philippines using Relative warp analysis of the whorl shell shape. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 8, 355-360.
García-Souto D, Qarkaxhija V, Pasantes JJ. 2017. Resolving the Taxonomic Status of Chamelea gallina and C. striatula (Veneridae, Bivalvia): A Combined Molecular Cytogenetic and Phylogenetic Approach. BioMed research international 2017, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7638790
Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST version 1.91: Paleontological Statistical Software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4, 9.
Horikoshi M, Thompson G. 1980. Distribution of subtidal molluscs collected by trawling in Tolo Harbour and Tolo Channel, Hong Kong, with special reference to habitat segregation in two venerid bivalves. Hong Kong: The Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China, Hong Kong University Press, 149162.
Iwata H, Ukai Y. 2002. SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Journal of Heredity 93, 384-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.5.384
Johannesson K, Rola N-Alvarez BE. 1993. Morphological differentiation and genetic cohesiveness over a microenvironmental gradient in the marine snail Littorina saxatilis. Evolution 47, 1770-1787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.15585646.1993.tb0126
Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics Image Processing 18, 236-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-664X(82)90034-X
Kyle CJ, Boulding EG. 1998. Molecular genetic evidence for parallel evolution in a marine gastropod, Littorina subrotundata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 265, 303-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0296
Magrini S, Scoppola A. 2010. Geometric morphometrics as a tool to resolve taxonomic problems: the case of Ophioglossum species (ferns). In: Nimis PL, Vignes Lebbe R (Eds.) Tools for Identifying Biodiversity: Progress and Problems, 251-256.
Marquez F, Amoroso R, Sainz MFG, Van der Molen S. 2010. Shell morphology changes in the scallop Aequipecten tehuelchus during its life span: a geometric morphometric approach. Aquatic Biology 11, 149-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ab00301
Mikkelsen P M, Bieler R, Kappner I, Rawlings TA. 2006. Phylogeny of Veneroidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) based on morphology and molecules. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 148, 439-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00262.x
Morais P, Rufino MM, Reis J, Dias E, Sousa R. 2013. Assessing the morphological variability of Uniodelphinus Spengler 1783. (Bivalvia, Unionidae) using geometric morphometry. Journal of Molluscan Studies 80, 17-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyt037
Morton B. (Ed.). 1993. The Marine Biology of the South China Sea: Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Marine Biology of Hong Kong and the South China Sea, Hong Kong, Kent State University Press, 134.
Reid DG. 1996. Systematics and evolution of Littorina. Ray Society, London,164.
Rohlf FJ, Archie JW. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Systematic Zoology 33, 302-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2413076
Rufino MM, Gaspar MB, Pereira AM, Vasconcelos P. 2006. Use of Shape to Distinguish Chamelea gallina and Chamelea striatula (Bivalvia, Veneridae): Linear and Geometric Morphometric Methods. Journal of Morphology 267,1433–1440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10489
Stoeckle M, Waggoner PE, Ausubel JS. 2004. Barcoding Life: Ten Reasons. Consortium for barcode of Life, v3.0. Retrieved from: www.vbarcodeoflife.org/content/barcodinglife-ten-reasons-pamphlet 2 Dec 2015.
Trussel GC. 1996. Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: The role of a common crab predator. Evolution 50, 448-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.15585646.1996.tb04507.x
Trussel GC. 2000. Phenotypic clines, plasticity, and morphological trade-offs in an intertidal snail. Evolution 54, 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1554/00143820(2000)054[0151:PCPAMT]2.0.CO;2
Vadopalas B, Pietsch T, Friedman C. 2010. The proper name for the geoduck: resurrection of Panopea generosa Gould, 1850, from the synonymy of Panopea abrupta (Conrad, 1849) (Bivalvia, Myoida, Hiatellidae), Malacologia 52, 169-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.4002/040.052.0111
Websters M, Sheets HD. 2010. A Practical Introduction to landmark-based geometric morphometrics. The Paleontological Society Papers. In Quantitative Methods in Paleobiology 16, 163-188.
Whitehead PJP. 1977. Emanuel Mendez da Costa and the conchology or Natural History of Shells. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Historical Series). 6,1-24.
Yamakawa AY, Imai H. 2013. PCR-RFLP typing reveals a new invasion of Taiwanese Meretrix (Bivalvia, Veneridae) to Japan. Aquatic Invasions 8,407-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2013.8.4.04
Yoosukh W, Matsukuma A. 2001. Taxonomic study on Meretrix (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from Thailand, 1-5.
Mark Lloyd Dapar, Sharon Rose Tabugo (2018), Describing shell shapes of Venerid bivalves using elliptic fourier analysis; IJB, V12, N1, January, P82-89
https://innspub.net/describing-shell-shapes-of-venerid-bivalves-using-elliptic-fourier-analysis/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0