Determination of allowable use for Stipa hohenackerian in semi-steppe rangelands of Iran

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2013
Views (1000)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Determination of allowable use for Stipa hohenackerian in semi-steppe rangelands of Iran

F. Ghasriani, A. Mohebby, E. Zandi Esfahan
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(6), 1-7, June 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Current research was carried out in selected sites of semi-steppe region including Arshagh (Ardebil), Firoozkooh (Tehran), Kordan (Alborz) and Jashloobar (Semnan). Stipa hohenackerian is a key and palatable species which has a considerable portion in rangeland yield. For this purpose, 40 similar species of Stipa hohenackerian were selected in each site. Selected species were exposed to different harvesting intensities of 25, 50 and 75 and 0% as control group. Data were analyzed by SPSS and MSTATC and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used for mean comparisons. According to the results, no significant differences were recorded for 25 and 50% harvesting intensities in terms of studied traits but a harvesting intensity of 75% negatively affected Stipa hohenackerian. Consequently, a harvesting intensity of 25-50% is recommended as the best allowable use for Stipa hohenackeriana in this vegetative region and other similar areas.

Amiri F. 2007. Multipurpose model for rangeland by using GIS (case study: Ghara aghagh Semirom catchment). Ph.D. thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Arzani H. 2009. Range analysis (M.Sc. Booklet), Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran.

Gharedaghi H, Fazel Najafaabadi M. 2000. Seasonal changes in carbohydrate reserves in the key plants of Polour area. The second national range and rangelands management conference,Tehran,16-18.

Fazilati A, Hosseini Araghi H. 1965. Country rangelands and management, adjustment and reclamation methods of it, Range engineering office press.

Fridman P. 2003. Satiety and feeding station behavior of grazing steers. Society for Range Management, 42- 160.

Fulstone F. 2009. Annual operating instruction in Missouri flat allotment for the 2009 grazing season, United States Department of Aagriculture, Forest Services, Humboldt-Toiyabe national forest, file code: 2210.

Ganskopp D. 1988. Defoliation of Thurber needlegrass: herbage and root responses, Journal of Rangemanagement 41, (6).

Holechek JL, Cole R, Fisher J, Valdez R. 2003. Natural resources, ecology, economic and policy. Rangelands 26, 118-223.

Mohammad Sy. 2009. Studying the allowance forage of the important range species in Dehno rangelands, final repor of project, Kerman, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Zare MT. 2012. Studying the allowance forage of the important range species in Nodoushan rangelands, final repor of project, Yazd, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Khodagholi M. 2012. Studying the allowance forage of the important range species in Soh range, final repor of project, Isfahan, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Reece PE, Alexander JD, Johnson JR. 2001. Drought management on range and pastureland, a handbook for Nebraska and South Dakota, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Zahedi S. 2011. Studying the allowance forage of the important range species in Majidabad paddock, final repor of project, Kordestan , Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Sharifi J, Aliakbarzade E, Azimi F, Hekmatjo S. 2009. Study of the exclosure effect on health and trend of natural rangelands of Ardabil province, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

Smith L, Ruyle G, Maynard J, Barker S. 2007. Principles of obtaining and interpreting utilization data on rangelands, The University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.

Yang M, Shoaling W, Tandon Y. 2000. Grazing capacity and stocking rate. Rangelands 22, 7-11.

Zhao w, Chen SP, Lin GH. 2007. Compensatory growth responses to clipping defoliation in Leymus chinensis (Poaceae( under nutrient addition and water deficiency conditions. Plant Ecology DOI 10.1007/s11258-007-9336-3.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.