Determination of the best method of estimating the time of concentration in pasture watersheds (case study: Banadak Sadat and Siazakh Watersheds, Iran)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2013
Views (621)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Determination of the best method of estimating the time of concentration in pasture watersheds (case study: Banadak Sadat and Siazakh Watersheds, Iran)

Ghorban Vahabzadeh, Iman Saleh, Atta Safari, Khabat Khosravi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(12), 150-159, December 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Temporal parameters are used in most of hydrological and hydraulic models. The most common temporal parameter in hydrology is time of concentration which is required for spillway design, flood volume estimation, producing flood hydrograph and much other hydrological analysis. Therefore, in this research, 10 estimation methods have been calculated for each sub-basin of both studied watersheds. Ultimately, equations of estimating the time of concentration were evaluated using mean deviation, mean difference, relative error percentage and mean square error tests and comparison method of mean by Tukey method and their categorization in Minitab software. The results of analysis of variance table showed that, there is a significant difference at the level of 1% between the equations. The results of analysis of variance by Tukey method for Banadak Sadat watershed showed that, Passini Model (which has the minimum amount of MD, BIAS, RE, RMSE by 0.001, 0.0031, 0.0043, 1.892 respectively) is the best approach, and after this model, Ventura model and Rational Hydrograph were respectively the best equations to estimate the time of concentration in the considered watershed. For Siazakh Watershed also, results showed that, the best method for concentration method estimation which has the minimum difference with observed values, is logistic hydrograph (also it has the minimum amount of MD, BIAS, RE and RMSE by 0.085, 0.0092, 0.068 and 5.83 respectively) and after this model, Kirpich and Chow models were respectively the best equations to estimate the time of concentration. Overall results demonstrated that, Rational Hydrograph equation is the most appropriate equation and Bransly-Williams equation is not recommended because of very much difference with observed data.

Azadnia F, Rostami N, Kamali Moghadam R. 2010. Comparison of some empirical equations to estimate time of concentration in Meymeh watershed, Ilam province. Journal of Water Research of Iran 3(4), 1-8.

Eslamian SS, Mehrabi A. 2006. Determination of empirical equations for estimating the time of concentration in mountainous watersheds. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 12(5), 23-33.

Esmaeili Ori A, Samiei M. 2011. Evaluation of empirical methods of estimating the time of concentration in Tange Khosouye watershed, Fars province. Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Watershed Sciences and Engineering.

Avarand  R,  Torabi  Poodeh  H,  Farzaei  A. 2006. Sensitivity analysis of HEC model to input parameters. 8th International Conference on River Engineering, Chamran University of Ahwaz.

Ziaei H. 2001. Principles of watershed management engineering. Astan Quds Razavi Press, University of Imam Reza (AS).

Kosari MR, Saremi Naeini MA, Taze M, Foroozeh MR. 2010. Sensitivity analysis of four equations for estimating the time of concentration in watersheds. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Dry Canvas 1(1), 57-67.

Mobaraki J. 2006. Investigation of the amount of empirical equations accuracy in estimating the time of concentration time to peak of hydrographs (Case study: Tehran province). M.Sc. Thesis of watershed management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, 151 p.

Alizadeh A. 2009. Principles of Applied Hydrology. Astan Quds Razavi Press, 26th edition, 634p.

Motamed Vaziri B. 2004. Investigation of some empirical equations of estimating the time of concentration in Karaj watershed. M.Sc. Thesis of watershed management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, 125 p.

Mahdavi M. 2007. Applied hydrology. 2nd Issue, Tehran University Press, 5th edition, 427 p.

Najmaei M. 1990. Hydrology of Engineering. Volume 1, Science and Technology University Press, 608 p.

Fang X, Thompson D, Cleveland T, Pratistha Pardhan DE, Malla R. 2008. Time of concentration estimated using watershed parameter determined by automated and manual method. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 134 (2), 202-211.

Goitom TG. 1989. Evaluation of tc methods in a small Rural watershed, Channel flow and catchment run off: Centennial of Mannings_s Formula and Kuichling_s Rational formula B.C. Yen (Ed). University of Virginia, U.S. National Weather Service and University of Virginia.

Kang J, Kayhanian M, Stenstorm MK. 2008. Predicting the existence of storm water first flush from the time of concentration. Water Research 42(1-2), 220-228.

McCuen R. 1984. Estimating urban time of concentration. Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 100, 633-638.

Pilgrim DH. 1989. Rational methods for estimation of design floods for small to medium sized drainage basins in Australia, IAHS Publ, New direction for surface Water Modeling, Proceedings of the Baltimore Symposium, Australia, 247-259.

Sheridan J. 1994. Hydrograph time parameters for flatland watersheds. ASAE 37, 103-113.

Related Articles

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.

Spatiotemporal modeling of surface urban heat island and the influence of land cover changes in land surface temperature in Cagayan de Oro City, Misamis Oriental, Mindanao, Philippines

John Oliver R. Abian*, Peter D. Suson, Jaime Q. Guihawan, Hilly Ann Roa-Quiaoit, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 17-29, June 2026.

Language and culture: Prerequisites for human capital development and enhanced household food security among vulnerable women farmers in Imo State, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, N. U. Nzotta, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 1-16, June 2026.

Ziziphus spina-christi as a bioindicator of heavy metals (Cu, Cd) in Baghdad, Iraq

Israa Radhi Khudhair*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 45-49, May 2026.

Language choice for natural resource conservation and agricultural production information sharing and communication strategies for improved livelihoods among rural farmers in Southeast, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, N. U. Nzotta, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 27-44, May 2026.

Correlates of students’ beliefs on environmental protection: Awareness, compliance, and sociodemographic influences

Anderson G. Gonzales*, Cyrus Kelly Macabangon, Dexter Dumayag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 18-26, May 2026.

Prevalence of phosphate solubilising bacteria in Muthupet Mangrove Reserve

S. Alice Keerthana, V. Shanmugaraju*, M. Poongothai, P. Arun, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 9-17, May 2026.

The bush mango value chain in South West Cameroon: Governance, sustainability and emerging opportunities

Louis Njie Ndumbe*, Agbor Mc Nasare, Baliki Winifred, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 1-8, May 2026.