Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Determination of yield and yield components of gooseberry (Physalis peruviana) grown in dry conditions

Research Paper | February 1, 2012

| Download 6

Eray Tulukcu

Key Words:

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.2( 2), 22-29, February 2012


IJAAR 2012 [Generate Certificate]


This study was conducted in 2010 – 2011 in Konya Cumra Vocational High School trial area. Cumra is located in southern Konya which is at central Anatolia. Two kinds of fruit were obtained from gooseberry in the study (big and small). Big sized fruit weights with calyx were found 6,55 gr and fruit weights without calyx were found 6.32 gr in both trial years. The average yield per decare was 317 kg. In both trial years, first flowering was observed 30 days after plantation. Flowering proceeded until the end of harvest. Mature fruits were observed 60 days after flowering.


Copyright © 2012
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Determination of yield and yield components of gooseberry (Physalis peruviana) grown in dry conditions

Abak K, Guler HY, Sarı N, Paksoy M. 1993. Earliness and yield of physalis (P. ıxocarpa brot. And p. peruviana L.) in greenhouse, low tunnel and open field, Second Symposium on Protected Cultivation of Solanaceae in Mild Winter Climate, 13-16 April, Adana, Turkey.

Baytop T. 1999. Therapy With Plant In Turkey (2. Press), ISBN: 975-420-021-1, Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri Ltd. Şti., Istanbul.

Berger RG, Drawert F, Kollmannsberger H. 1989. The flavour of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). Z Lebensm Unters Forch 188, 122-126.

Besirli G, ve Surmeli N. 1998. Guvey Feneri (Physalis peruviana L.), Tarım ve Koy Dergisi, Sayı: 121, sa: 57, Tarım ve Koyisleri Bakanlıgı Dergisi, ISSN: 1300 – 8331, Ankara.

Besirli G, Sonmez I, Eroglu B. 2011. South Marmara Conditions Guvey Feneri (Physalıs Peruvıana L.) Potantial of Production. Uluslararası Katılımlı I. Ali Numan Kırac Tarım Kongresi ve Fuarı. Eskişehir

Celik H. 2011. New Alternative Fruit Gooseberry. (Erisim Aralık 2011). http://www.gifimey.com/altin_cilek_hakkinda.pdf

Girapu RK, Kumar A. 2006. Influence of nitrogen and spacing on growth, yield and economics of cape-gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) production, Proceedings of National Symposium on Production, West Bengal, November 22-24, pg: 145-149.

International Seed Testing Association. 1985. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol. 13, 421-463.

Kour, K., and Bakshi, P., 2006. “Comparative performance of some cape goosberry strains under amritsar conditions”, Hayrana J. Hortic Sci., 35(3&4): 263-264.

Novoa HR, Bojaca M. Galvis JA, Fischer G. 2006. Fruit maturity and calyx drying influence post-harvest behavior of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) stored at 12 ºC Agronomia Colombiana 24(1 ), 77 – 86

Puente LA, Pinto-Munoz CA, Castro ES, Cortes M. 2010. Physalis peruviana Linnaeus, the multiple properties of a highly functional fruit: Food Research International. 44, 7 1733 – 1740.

Rodrigues E, Rockenbach II, Cataneo C, Gonzaga, LV, Chaves ES, Fett R. 2009. Minerals and essential fatty acids of the exotic fruit Physalis peruviana L. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 29(3), Campinas.

Sarkar TK, Chattopadhyay TK. 1993. Correlation studies on cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). Ann. Agric. Res. 14, 211-214.