Determining the allowable use for Astragalus effusus Bunge in the mountainous and semi-steppe rangelands of Iran

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2016
Views (742)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Determining the allowable use for Astragalus effusus Bunge in the mountainous and semi-steppe rangelands of Iran

F. Ghasriani, A. Mohebby, H. A. Shirmardi, R. Mirakhorli, A. Eftekhari
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 9(4), 34-39, October 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Current research was performed in selected sites of mountain and semi-steppe rangelands of Iran. The vegetative region included Karsanak (Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari) and Jashlobar (Semnan). Astragalus effuses Bunge is a key and palatable species, having a considerable portion in rangelands production of the mentioned flora. For this purpose, 40 similar stands of Astragalus effusus were selected in each site. Selected species were exposed to different harvesting intensities of 25%, 50%, 75% and zero as control group. Data were analyzed by SPSS and MSTATC and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was used for mean comparisons. Our results clearly showed that a harvesting intensity of 25% is recommended as the best allowable use for Astragalus effusus in this vegetative region and other similar areas.

Amiri F. 2008. Multipurpose model for rangeland by using GIS (case study: Gharaaghagh Semirom catchment), Ph.D. thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Arzani H. 2010. Range Analysis (M.Sc. Booklet), Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran.

Ayala W. 2001. Change in the morphology, production and population of Grasslands to seasonal defoliation regimes. Institute of Natural Resources Massey University Newzeland.

Fazilati A, Hosseini Araghi H. 1965. Country rangelands and management, adjustment and reclamation methods of it, Range engineering office press.

Fulstone  F. 2009. Annual operating instruction in Missouri flat allotment for the 2009 grazing season. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Services, Humboldt- Toiyabe national forest, files code: 2210.

Ganskopp D. 1988. Thurber needle grass: Seasonal defoliation effects on forage quantity and quality, Journal of Range Management 51, 276-281.

Gasriiani  F,Mohebby  A, Zandi Esfahan  E. 2013. Determination of allowable use for Stipa hohenackerian in semi-steppe rangelands of Iran. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 3 (6), 1-7.

Gasriiani  F,  Zandi Esfahan  E, Mohebby  A. 2013. Determination of allowable use for Festuca ovinain semi-steppe and mountain rangelands of Iran. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 4(3), 77-83.

Gasriiani  F, Mohebby  A, Zandi Esfahan  E. 2013. Determination of allowable use for Bromus tomentellus in semi-steppeand mountain rangelands of Iran. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 3(11), 84-91.

Gharedagh H, Fazel Najafaabadi M. 2000. Seasonal changes in carbohydrate reserves in the key plants of Polour area. The second national range and rangelands management  conference,Tehran, 16-18.

Loeser R, Sisk D, CREWS E. 2007. Impact of Grazing Intensity during Drought in Arizona Grassland. Conservation Biology 21(1), 87-97. 

Moghadam MR. 2000. Rangeland and Range Management, Second edition, University of Tehran press. P 275.

Reece PE, Alexander JD, Johnson JR. 2001. Drought management on range and pastureland, a handbook for Nebraska and South Dakota, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Sharifi J, akbarzade  E, Azimi F, Hekmatjo S. 2009. Study of the exclosure effect on health and trend of natural rangelands of Ardabil province, RIFR, N frost 88, 843-852.

Smith MV. 2007. Effect of stocking rate and grazing management on the persistence and production on dry land on deep sands. Proc. Int. Grassland Cong. 9, 624-628.

Smith L, Ruyle G, Maynard J, Barker S. 2007. Principles of obtaining and interpreting utilization data on rangelands, The University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, 14 p.

Zhao w, Chen SP, Lin GH. 2007. Compensatory growth responses to clipping defoliation in Poaceae under nutrient addition and water deficiency conditions. Journal of Plant Ecology 209(2), p181-187.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.