Develop sustainable coffee-based farming model using cash crops production

Paper Details

Research Paper 15/01/2026
Views (77)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Develop sustainable coffee-based farming model using cash crops production

Maribel L. Fernandez, Roje Marie C. Rosqueta*, Diosa G. Alasaas, Boyet C. Pattung, Jaylord Dalapo, Janette Empleo
Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 134-142, January 2026.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was conducted February 2022 to March 9, 2023, to determine effects of levels of vermicompost on peanut intercropped in coffee plants. The study aimed to determine the best treatment using the following parameters: growth, yield performance, and Cost and Return Analysis (ROI). The different treatment in the study was: T1- Farmers Practice, T2- RR+700kg of vermicompost/ha, T3- RR+750kg of vermicompost/ha, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha. and layout in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Significant results were shown 30 days after planting (DAP) on the height of peanut plants. The number of peanut root nodules at 20, 40 and 60 DAP, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained highest mean of 25.80 cm, 36.58 cm, and 53.65 cm respectively. While T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained highest number of leaves, and T1- Farmers Practice obtained lowest. The to weight of pods, developed pods, and number of seeds per pod shows that T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained the highest mean. T1- Farmers Practice obtained the lowest number of undeveloped pods with a mean of 10.15g.  Moreover, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha remained the highest yield/ha with a mean of 1,543 kilograms. The application of T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained the highest ROI gaining 259.13%. The study revealed that NSIC Pn 09 applied with different levels of vermicompost as organic fertilizer influenced the plant height, root nodules, leaves, developed and undeveloped pods, seed number and pod weight. While, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained highest plant height, root nodules, leaves, developed pods, seeds per pod, yield/ ha and ROI.

Abdzad G, Noorhosseini A, Niyaki SA. 2010. Effects of iron and nitrogen fertilizers on yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Astaneh Ashrafiyeh, Iran. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 9(3), 256 – 262.

Adinya IB, enun EE, Ijoma JU. 2010. Exploring profitability potentials groundnut production through agroforestry practices a case study in Nigeria. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 20(2), 123 – 131.

Alcantara EN. de, Nobrega JCA, Ferreira MM. 2009. Methods of weed control in coffee affect soil chemical properties. Ciência Rural 39(3), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009000300017

Ali AAG, Mowafy SAE. 2003. Effect of different levels of potassium and phosphorus fertilizers with the foliar application of zinc and boron on peanut in sandy soils. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 335-358.

Arya SS, Chauhan S, Salve A. 2016. Peanuts as functional food: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 53(1), 31–41.

Espíndola JAA, Guerra JGM, Almeida DL de, Teixeira MG, Urquiaga S. 2006. Decomposition and nutrient accumulation in perennial herbaceous legumes intercropped with banana. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa 30(2), 321-328.

Favero C, Da, Jucksch I, Alvarenga RC, Costa LM da. 2001. Changes in the population of weeds in the presence of green manures. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília 36(11), 1355-1362.

Habtamu Deribe. 2018. Review on Effect of weed on coffee quality yield and its control measures in Southwestern Ethiopia International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences 2018, 4(10), 7-16.

Masa, Maria Rasa. 2023. Coffee farming in the Philippines.

Pacheco LP, Pires FR, Monteiro FP, Procópio S. de O, Assis RL. De, Carmo ML. do, Petter FA. 2008. Performance of cover crops in overseeded in soybean crop. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43(7), 815-823.

Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V. 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regulation 41, 75–88.

Tarawali A, Quee D. 2014. Performance of groundnut varieties in two agroecologies in Sierra Leone. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9(19), 1442 1448.

Taru VB, Khagya IZ, Mshelia SI, Adebayo EF. 2008. Economic Efficiency of resource use in groundnut production in Adamawa State of Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Science 56, 4896-900.

Taru VB, Kyagya IZ, Mshelia SI. 2010. Profitability of groundnut Production in Michika Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science 1(1), 25–29.

Vara Prasad PV, Vijaya Gopal K, Hari DU. 2009. Growth and production of groundnut, in Soils, Plant Growth and Crop Production. In: Encyclopedia of Life               Support Systems. (Ed. Willy H. V.), United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization, Eolss. 11- 27p.

Weiss A, Van Crowder LM, Bernardi M. 2000. Communicating     agrometeorological information to farming communities. Agricultural Forest Meteorology 103, 185–196.

Yakubu H, Kwari JD, Tekwa JA. 2010. Nodulation and N2- fixation grain legumes as affected by Boron Fertilizers in Sudano – Sahelian Zone of Northeastern Nigeria. American Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 8(5), 514–519.

Related Articles

Comparative assessment of mixed and intercropping of lentil (Lens culinaris) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Md. Shamim Ahmed*, Mohammad Tojammel Haq, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 151-158, February 2026.

Extraction of biologically active substances of fungi isolated from various ecosystems and evaluation of their effect

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, G. A. Tomuyeva, A. R. Hasanova, V. Y. Hasanova, A. M. Hasanov, S. E. Nagiyeva, A. G. Eyvazov, G. T. Huseynova, G. A. Qasimova, V. K. Isayeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 143-150, February 2026.

Integrative role of yeast culture metabolites in aquatic health and productivity

Sajjad Ur Rahman, Dur E Nayab, Rabia Kanwar*, Muhammad Mukarram Bashir, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 126-142, February 2026.

Land use efficiency and performance of sweet corn-cowpea intercropping influenced by temporal planting and methods of fertilizer application

Bryan Cristian M. Demolar, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 101-125, February 2026.

Illuminating the deficiency: Public awareness of vitamin- D in Lahore, Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Arif*, Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Zeerak Laila, Ahmad Ali Shabbir, Farrukh Nadeem, M Muazzam Khan, Yousuf Shahjahan, Rajab Ali, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 91-100, February 2026.

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.